i did both and your missing the point, your invincible and you dont know any of the people there so by killin the german soldiers in your immortal presence no harm comes to your side or you could quite simply kill hitler before he can do fuck all, and also most of the people who said yes are probably as mentally deranged as medthvirus said:Everyone who said yes either did not read the OP's post or do not understand the nature of warfare. I'm betting on the latter.
Respectfully, I don't think you grasp either.llew said:i did both and your missing the point, your invincible and you dont know any of the people there so by killin the german soldiers in your immortal presence no harm comes to your side or you could quite simply kill hitler before he can do fuck all, and also most of the people who said yes are probably as mentally deranged as medthvirus said:Everyone who said yes either did not read the OP's post or do not understand the nature of warfare. I'm betting on the latter.
Killing Hitler wouldn't have changed ANYTHING. There would just be a new (and maybe way worse) nazi leader, probably Joseph Goebbels. You can't stop something big like this just by killing one person.llew said:yes i would for many reason, im a homicidal maniac, im invincible so why not? and if i am invincible i can just walk up to the german war machine, walk straight past it and kick hitler in the balls before he gets out of his stunned look then shoot him in the face
Well I guess Martin, some would call you a madman.martin said:Yes, Yes I would.
Har har har,Pimppeter2 said:Well I guess Martin, some would call you a madman.martin said:Yes, Yes I would.
Sorry, couldn't resist.
Yeah I understand that that's part of their culture. But under no circumstances does that extend as far as to accommodate the rape and killings the soldiers carried out.darkonnis said:snipClaptonKnophlerHendrix said:snip
Yeah I'm familiar with these cases, but I don't think that just because it was the doctors carrying out the atrocities that it absolves the soldiers of delivering the prisoners to them, knowing full well what would happen to them (unlike in the case of German soldiers and the SS) as well as all the many other cases of horrible injustices carried out by the Japanese forces, sometimes under orders from superiors, sometimes not.holographicman said:your both wrong.darkonnis said:snipClaptonKnophlerHendrix said:snip
japanese doctors were evil
Unit 731, a covert biological and chemical warfare research and development unit of the Imperial Japanese Army, undertook lethal human experimentation during the Second Sino-Japanese War (1937) and World War II.
Prisoners of war were subjected to vivisection without anesthesia.
Vivisections were performed on prisoners after infecting them with various diseases. Scientists performed invasive surgery on prisoners, removing organs to study the effects of disease on the human body. These were conducted while the patients were alive because it was feared that the decomposition process would affect the results. The infected and vivisected prisoners included men, women, children, and infants.
Vivisections were also performed on pregnant women, sometimes impregnated by doctors, and the fetus removed.
Some prisoners' limbs were frozen and amputated, while others had limbs frozen then thawed to study the effects of the resultant untreated gangrene and rotting.
Prisoners had limbs amputated in order to study blood loss.
Some prisoners had their stomachs surgically removed and the esophagus reattached to the intestines.
Parts of the brain, lungs, liver, etc. were removed from some prisoners.
In 2007, Doctor Ken Yuasa testified to the Japan Times that, "I was afraid during my first vivisection, but the second time around, it was much easier. By the third time, I was willing to do it." He believes at least 1,000 persons, including surgeons, were involved in vivisections throughout mainland China.
I agree, I'd go for the tarantino approach, but the OP did say on the front.Protocol95 said:Hope so, but if I couldn't be killed and this was and option, i'd hunt down a few individuals whose deaths could end the war and not millions.