No It isn't. You aren't creating life, merely "moving" it. You wouldn't be able to make a new person appear without the original template. Saying that teleportation is creating life is like me saying I created your post by quoting it.AccursedTheory said:By all conventional knowledge, teleporting a living being should be impossible to do, and is basically the same as being able to create new life.
I'll just restate my earlier point - it's not about "soul", it's about the specific energy states and vectors of each of your molecules. If you take all the information about the arrangement of the particles in your body and use it to recreate the body in another place, you'll end up with just a dead corpse. Unless you come up with a teleporter which also records the energy states and vectors of each molecule and bestows them upon the substrate molecules at the destination - and does it in a fantastically short amount of time, because any error in relative vectors might have grave consequences - there's no way you can do it in a way you say it'd work.viking97 said:OT well, yes. i don't believe in any sort of "soul", i believe we are a construct of molecules working in a fantastically complex way, and even if the teleporting process was simply to scan my molecules and then send this data to another transporter which then rebuilds me using the same molecules (any molecule of any particular pure substance is identical, at least that is if i understood me chemistry class correctly) in the exact same structure, and then disintegrating the first me, i'd still do it, because, from my point of view, all that happened is i moved from one place to another.
HOLY CRAP.duchaked said:
Yes, you are, because in the process of teleportation, you are typically rendered down into either data or molecular components, both of which would result in the destruction of your body, which would KILL YOU. That's first off.Ruffythepirate said:No It isn't. You aren't creating life, merely "moving" it. You wouldn't be able to make a new person appear without the original template. Saying that teleportation is creating life is like me saying I created your post by quoting it.AccursedTheory said:By all conventional knowledge, teleporting a living being should be impossible to do, and is basically the same as being able to create new life.
Haha, damn brilliant movie.The Real Sandman said:Teleportation in theory sounds awesome, but I don't think I'd ever use it.
YEa il stick to that to xDWahful said:I prefer magic ones, that dont need to be explained. Much better.
Ah, but even if people did come out seeming perfectly fine, what if they were just copying the information of your atoms and reproducing it somewhere else? It'd be a perfect clone, but the original you (your consciousness right now) would be terminated. There'd be no difference to anyone else though.Death God said:Depends on how many people try it before me and came out fine. But I'd still probably go even if I was the first.
But are you really you ten seconds from now? Or do you just constantly inherit memories from someone who just stopped existing, which creates an illusion of a continuous existence? You are in constant motion after all and you couldn't tell the difference if every molecule and atom in your body was changed right now.AccursedTheory said:The teleporter challenges the very notion of death really. By all conventional knowledge, teleporting a living being should be impossible to do, and is basically the same as being able to create new life (Something which is impossible as of today, at least on a multicellular creature).
So no, I would not, as the 'thing' coming out on the other side would not be me.