It's averting the tendency of action movies to have explosions, soundtracks and love interests in bikinis. It's less visually appealing because of it, but it a bit more interesting and thought provoking. That said, it isn't perfect. If you want to reply, please give some more reasons you don't like it.kman123 said:Anything after Saw 1.
And...No Country For Old Men. I hate it. I absolutely hate it. It's boring, pretentious, and it shits over the near stellar careers of the Coen brothers.
I justhope s/he means Saw sequels not all films made after the first Saw movie! To be fair the smell of shit coming from the Coens is because of their shockingly poor and bemusing (why did they try) remake of the Ealing Studios classic The Ladykillers'.Ninjat_126 said:It's averting the tendency of action movies to have explosions, soundtracks and love interests in bikinis. It's less visually appealing because of it, but it a bit more interesting and thought provoking. That said, it isn't perfect. If you want to reply, please give some more reasons you don't like it.kman123 said:Anything after Saw 1.
And...No Country For Old Men. I hate it. I absolutely hate it. It's boring, pretentious, and it shits over the near stellar careers of the Coen brothers.
For me... One of those generic parody-porn films.