Your favorite WWII gun

Recommended Videos

butteforce

New member
Mar 4, 2010
49
0
0
Thank god. At least two people said the M3A1. Stupid rifles. SMGs all the way.

Just say no to 1911s. People seem to think they're a lot better than they really are. Ergonomic nightmares with stupid grip safeties and they're a pain in the ass to take down. Great when they were invented, not very impressive 100 years later.
 

Arkzism

New member
Jan 24, 2008
359
0
0
the m1911a1 pistol it is a vary nive gun.. sturdy check, semi auto check, still in service check
 

Arkzism

New member
Jan 24, 2008
359
0
0
butteforce said:
Thank god. At least two people said the M3A1. Stupid rifles. SMGs all the way.

Just say no to 1911s. People seem to think they're a lot better than they really are. Ergonomic nightmares with stupid grip safeties and they're a pain in the ass to take down. Great when they were invented, not very impressive 100 years later.
i rather have a 1911 any day than wasting lead with an smg
 

demoman_chaos

New member
May 25, 2009
2,254
0
0
I'd take an M1 into a modern battle.

darkman80723 said:
Dead tie between Mosin-Nagant and the M1 Garand. I own both and both are excellent weapons.
Where did you get an M1 and how much do they run?
 

Delta 3 Actual

New member
Feb 6, 2009
89
0
0
demoman_chaos said:
I'd take an M1 into a modern battle.
you'd die really REALLY fast, an AK47 w/o optics can out-shoot an M1 garand

formless777 said:
The AK47 saw service in 1945. The Russians used it on the Japanese in Manchuria. Russia won a lot.
wow, that is one of the most non-senseical things i've ever heard, they call it the AK47, because it started production in 1947.
 

JourneyThroughHell

New member
Sep 21, 2009
5,010
0
0
PPSh-41.

It's absolutely lethal and has surprisingly low recoil.

When any of the WW2 games let me use the PPSh, I'm very happy.
 

demoman_chaos

New member
May 25, 2009
2,254
0
0
Delta 3 Actual said:
you'd die really REALLY fast, an AK47 w/o optics can out-shoot an M1 garand
Yes I would die quickly, but not because of the gun. An AK can fire faster, but it doesn't matter how fast you fire it matters how fast you get a round into your target. The AK is known for reliability and being very inaccurate. The M16/M4 is known for accuracy and its lack of knockdown power. The M1 is reliable, accurate, can fire and reload quickly, and will knock your target down each time. 1 well-aimed shot is far better than 10 poorly aimed.
 

Delta 3 Actual

New member
Feb 6, 2009
89
0
0
demoman_chaos said:
Delta 3 Actual said:
you'd die really REALLY fast, an AK47 w/o optics can out-shoot an M1 garand
Yes I would die quickly, but not because of the gun. An AK can fire faster, but it doesn't matter how fast you fire it matters how fast you get a round into your target. The AK is known for reliability and being very inaccurate. The M16/M4 is known for accuracy and its lack of knockdown power. The M1 is reliable, accurate, can fire and reload quickly, and will knock your target down each time. 1 well-aimed shot is far better than 10 poorly aimed.
not at less than 300 yards,where the AK maintains it's accuracy, and outside of 300 yards is almost impossible to hit with an M1 because it can't have optics mounted to it. Also inside of 300 yards, the AK47's 7.62x39 has the same kinetic force as the M1's 30-ot-6 or even the M14's 7.62x51 NATO cartridge.