Your Problems With Modern Warfare 2
- Thread starter zHellas
- Start date
Recommended Videos
I've played games with equal graphics that had them stay longer, this includes shell casings. MW2 had a higher budget and they stay less long. And while they may fade eventually, they could at least stay for a minute or so.Withall said:
Mainly that it wasn't as great as CoD:4.
There is also a crap load of balance issues, Air space in multiplayer is way too open, apparently the Intervention is the only weapon in multiplayer, players spamming me messages about points for leveling up, most maps are too small, players camp all the time, I can keep going on with this.
Now despite all the flaws I still love MW2. Its a solid shooter, with a good singleplayer.
There is also a crap load of balance issues, Air space in multiplayer is way too open, apparently the Intervention is the only weapon in multiplayer, players spamming me messages about points for leveling up, most maps are too small, players camp all the time, I can keep going on with this.
Now despite all the flaws I still love MW2. Its a solid shooter, with a good singleplayer.
When you kill people in multiplayer, blood doesn't come out, money does.
Great, now the chavs think people bleed money when you puncture their flesh. Good job guys.
Great, now the chavs think people bleed money when you puncture their flesh. Good job guys.
exactlyGame4Fun said:
it seems as though xbox is turning into a competition these days more than just a fun game
This. Really Activision tried too hard to be better than CoD4 and in the processdududf said:For a lot you do. Less lag, control over your servers, you can deal with hackers, you can add mods to the server you can do a fuck ton more then you could without.
Go look at this.
That's a taste of the screw up for PC.
Not to mention the gaping plot holes, and general nonsense in the game.
I have 3 copies of WaW JUST for Nazi Zombies.TOGSolid said:In WaW they save the profiles online. World at War is still the superior COD product. It's balanced better and has ZOMBIES.dududf said:For a lot you do. Less lag, control over your servers, you can deal with hackers, you can add mods to the server you can do a fuck ton more then you could without.zHellas said:
Go look at this.
That's a taste of the screw up for PC.
Treyarch take care of their customers.
Yeah, it makes me actually kinda curious about Black Ops. WaW was a vast improvement to MW, and Treyarch have said that if they thought something was stupid in MW2, they were gonna axe it/change it.dududf said:
Curious indeed to what sort of game they're going to put out.
Whats why I REALLY want Black Ops! NAUW!dududf said:I have 3 copies of WaW JUST for Nazi Zombies.TOGSolid said:In WaW they save the profiles online. World at War is still the superior COD product. It's balanced better and has ZOMBIES.dududf said:For a lot you do. Less lag, control over your servers, you can deal with hackers, you can add mods to the server you can do a fuck ton more then you could without.zHellas said:
Go look at this.
That's a taste of the screw up for PC.
Treyarch take care of their customers.
Like MW2, just better... Way better! I mean.. It has crossbows, woo!.. And dedicated servers ofc...
Then not even the wallhackers will be able to get to me in my camping-spots!
Well, it does make me angry at times in that you can be a very unskilled player and still do relatively well, but then I guess that's why the cheap guns/attachments/equipment/killstreaks are in the game in the first place. Seriously, it's a pretty fun game because there's a lot to do, there are many goals to aim for and it's easy to have fun with.