isnt that a bit harsh when the punishment for the same stuff but with humans instead of animals is allot lower?Oskar K said:Execute everybody who ever abused an animal by first ripping their nails off cutten the tip of the fingers off break their legs cut theyre eyelids off and then get a group of vulentered children to kill them off with a pistol while the abusers family watched and then feed the body to sharks!... and ban any other form of music exept the one i like... well at least ban it in my backgarden.
Why am I being killed?SultanP said:That people under 18 who write and record music will be punished. Severely. Possibly by death.
that, and have all the trolls and hackers executed. and people may only speak one language. english.hyrulegaybar said:My first decree is to tax every last damn religion out there. What about you?
nope because humans can defend themselves. I read about some chinese fur farms that find and catch stray cats and dogs hang the up in the back legs or tails and skin them alive and afterwards just throw the living animal, skinned, in a pile. that requires a much bigger punishment than say just shooting someone in the head.. but you do have a point. ill probally make it legal to kill someone if they have killed one or more of your family members in anyway you want to. but if you abuse this law you will be sent to work camps. that seems fair..henritje said:isnt that a bit harsh when the punishment for the same stuff but with humans instead of animals is allot lower?Oskar K said:Execute everybody who ever abused an animal by first ripping their nails off cutten the tip of the fingers off break their legs cut theyre eyelids off and then get a group of vulentered children to kill them off with a pistol while the abusers family watched and then feed the body to sharks!... and ban any other form of music exept the one i like... well at least ban it in my backgarden.
you forgot destroy the economy and get assasinated by own staff.tehroc said:Take all the money from the rich, equalize the populace and focus it all towards space exploration.
I dunno where you're getting all this from. I want to tax religions. I think businesses are already taxed (maybe not effectively) but are nonetheless taxed. Religions aren't. I do not see any logic in it, especially when religions engage in profit-minded things. I ignored your NPO comment because I had no idea where the hell you got that from.Zeeky_Santos said:'Evil Little man' is more of a figure of speech than any sort of height speculation.hyrulegaybar said:At 6'3" I'm not all that little. And I don't think it's evil to expect a business to be taxed like a business. They'll find a way to pay their leaders if they're taxed, believe me.Zeeky_Santos said:Wow, putting taxes on non-profit organisations too? What about all the churches etc. out there that have leaders or whatever with day jobs, you know, for the 6 days a week they aren't talking to people in a congregation? That sort of organisation shouldn't be taxed. You are an evil little man, you know that?hyrulegaybar said:My first decree is to tax every last damn religion out there. What about you?
More importantly, you said to tax all religions. You never said to single out the businesses, you just want to tax religion because you see a world of exploits, completely ignoring what I said about non-profit organisations. Non-profit organisations aren't businesses.
Remind me to step down as emperor after making my first decree and appointing you emperor next.fanozelda9 said:Anyone with a reality show on E! will be erased from the history books. Any mention of these people will land you in prison.
The reality shows based on jobs (excluding Dirty Jobs) will be combined by job into "winner keeps their business" tournaments, with the competitions consisting of whatever random activity I feel like watching at the time.
To keep chances of a revolution down, free internet and baked goods to all.
TV channels will stay within 90% of what the channel describes it self as.
Corollary: Disney will bring back Power Rangers.
and the last thing I can think of, The (genre) Movie movies will be destroyed, and anyone who thinks these are good will go through mandatory brain swaps with various rocks.
I certainly understand that not all religions are not designed for profit. However, many are, and I feel that they should be taxed.Zeeky_Santos said:Because you don't understand the idea that not all religions are designed for profit? Because you are a cynical bastard who thinks "scam" whenever religion is brought up.hyrulegaybar said:I dunno where you're getting all this from. I want to tax religions. I think businesses are already taxed (maybe not effectively) but are nonetheless taxed. Religions aren't. I do not see any logic in it, especially when religions engage in profit-minded things. I ignored your NPO comment because I had no idea where the hell you got that from.Zeeky_Santos said:'Evil Little man' is more of a figure of speech than any sort of height speculation.hyrulegaybar said:At 6'3" I'm not all that little. And I don't think it's evil to expect a business to be taxed like a business. They'll find a way to pay their leaders if they're taxed, believe me.Zeeky_Santos said:Wow, putting taxes on non-profit organisations too? What about all the churches etc. out there that have leaders or whatever with day jobs, you know, for the 6 days a week they aren't talking to people in a congregation? That sort of organisation shouldn't be taxed. You are an evil little man, you know that?hyrulegaybar said:My first decree is to tax every last damn religion out there. What about you?
More importantly, you said to tax all religions. You never said to single out the businesses, you just want to tax religion because you see a world of exploits, completely ignoring what I said about non-profit organisations. Non-profit organisations aren't businesses.
Religion is not a business, some chapters of various religions might try to be dicks and profiteer, but for the most part, religion does not turn a profit. They are organisations nevertheless and there for are Non-Profit Organisations. They only work to Spread the word of God/Allah/Jehova/Etc.
"Tax religion" is far too vague and general. If you said "Tax the Religious sections earning a profit from their preaching etc." Then by all means, go ahead, but don't just say "religion" as a general term.