There are plenty of musicians that I love. And I'm sure a lot of them didn't start recording music that the public had to listen to before they turned 18. Really, the "law" spawned from the children's Eurovision, and me being forced to listen to their ridiculous music by having to be in the vicinity of people who listen to the music that comes out of that horrid place. It wasn't helped by how easy it is for people to write some trite soulless ear junk, and get a record deal for it. I try to avoid that stuff the best that I can, but I still know far too many pop and rap songs released by kids singing about stuff they don't know shit about.ShaqLevick said:Dude I kind of hate you, I mean do you really think that the Justin Biebers of the world are going to reach voting age and you will suddenly appreciate their sound. Are you implying that people under 18 don't need to practice their skills in order to improve, in order to aspire to greater things. Can you really put an age limit on a poetic license? Every musician you enjoy started before they were 18, it just takes longer to perfect a sound when you don't run it through the auto-tuner. Unless their are no musicians that you like then I probably do hate you.SultanP said:That people under 18 who write and record music will be punished. Severely. Possibly by death.
Really, when it all comes down to it, I think I'd rather get rid of all the children who start recording music that gets produced, and the adult artists who started too soon. Just so I wouldn't have to listen to another squeaky voiced child sing about women to a hip-hop or pop track. But the law isn't retroactive, so I'd still be able to enjoy bands like The Who, and all the other great musicians from the past, who by far surpass anything out today, in my opinion, of course.
Edit: In short, they can practice all they want until 18, or thereabout, as long as they don't record it and get it produced so people like me get assaulted with it.