So the game is good old-fashioned Deontology propaganda.
It is worth mentioning that the most significant (as far as I know at least) philosopher supporting Deontology - Immanuel Kant - thought that if a man was running away from a murderer and asked you to lend him shelter, doing so was the right thing to do, but if the murderer then came to ask if you had seen the man, telling him the truth would be the right thing to do as well - because lying is evil and to tell the truth is more important than helping someone not get murdered.
If a game gives you a moral choice that is actually good, why do they have to mess it up by labelling one as the good one.
It is worth mentioning that the most significant (as far as I know at least) philosopher supporting Deontology - Immanuel Kant - thought that if a man was running away from a murderer and asked you to lend him shelter, doing so was the right thing to do, but if the murderer then came to ask if you had seen the man, telling him the truth would be the right thing to do as well - because lying is evil and to tell the truth is more important than helping someone not get murdered.
If a game gives you a moral choice that is actually good, why do they have to mess it up by labelling one as the good one.