I've always had a soft spot for the series, and its one of my favorite franchises, but i think fable II was better overall
Zero Punctuation: Fable 3
- Thread starter Yahtzee Croshaw
- Start date
Recommended Videos
You arer correct as always on the marriage thing in Fable, Yahtzee. There's no point in it unless you want the achievements, and none of them are likeable because there are a hundred copies of them in the world. I did it once, and the ***** desided to break up with me because I never came home. Well excuse me if I was busy saving the world sweetie, I needed to make sure you wouldn't be raped or pillaged while I was away. But no, that still doesn't get me off the hook, so I shot her, because like I said, it's difficult to form attachments to a robot clone.
I enjoy all the fable games, if not for mindless entertainment, as has been pointed out by other people, the ending annoyed me alot also. When I play RPG's I base my choices around what I would do in real life, and the ending of the game confused the shit outta my moral compass which got me majorly pissed lol. They are fun to play, but fuck you peter molyneux, you manage to cock it up somehow with every sequel. What also annoyed me was the divergence away from the Old Kingdom stories and stuff
I found Fable 3 a very wierd game.
Firstly, if you're King/Queen you can massacre anyone you want and the guards won't care, well they'll QQ but won't do a thing and then will die themselves.
Secondly, killing a person does not make it cheaper to fight off the evil goo.
Thirdly, AOE is win.
Fourthly, It makes you spend 5 years repeatidly consuming the throat lining of your friend in co-op mode just to open one particular demon door which won't open as it's bugged, and then you feel awkwad afterwards.
Fiftlysplurgatron you can pratically, make all the 'good' choices, donate the gold to the treasurey and massacre your citizens to still end up being evil but saving everyone and being 'nice'. So you can be an good king who put's his subjects' wellbeing first, so he can enjoy stripping them of their pathetic lives afterwards when he's trying to grind villager kills to upgrade his weapon.
Sixthly it reminds me alot of Sims. A side thing you can do is socialise with people and do pointless things to gain favour; like the Sims (the only physical contact I like is dragging them to the Dark Sanctum to be burnt alive). Even the npc models reminded me of the Sims, that stupid over-cartoony human faciness.
Firstly, if you're King/Queen you can massacre anyone you want and the guards won't care, well they'll QQ but won't do a thing and then will die themselves.
Secondly, killing a person does not make it cheaper to fight off the evil goo.
Thirdly, AOE is win.
Fourthly, It makes you spend 5 years repeatidly consuming the throat lining of your friend in co-op mode just to open one particular demon door which won't open as it's bugged, and then you feel awkwad afterwards.
Fiftlysplurgatron you can pratically, make all the 'good' choices, donate the gold to the treasurey and massacre your citizens to still end up being evil but saving everyone and being 'nice'. So you can be an good king who put's his subjects' wellbeing first, so he can enjoy stripping them of their pathetic lives afterwards when he's trying to grind villager kills to upgrade his weapon.
Sixthly it reminds me alot of Sims. A side thing you can do is socialise with people and do pointless things to gain favour; like the Sims (the only physical contact I like is dragging them to the Dark Sanctum to be burnt alive). Even the npc models reminded me of the Sims, that stupid over-cartoony human faciness.
i hated fable 3 in its entirety. everything was just a combination between fable 2 and a mexican restaurant's urinal. i loved the fable franchise up intill this point, and after completing the main quest i felt as if i had wasted a week of my life playing this game