Zero Punctuation: Metal Gear Solid 4

[fanrock51]

great review. i don't play mgs4 yet. I have played 2 and 3, and i like it. and i have to agree with yahtzee though. sometimes the game makes me bored and confused but i still gonna buy mgs4 anyway.

 

[Whoracle]

What I am saying is story is not bad, and alot of detail can be a very good thing especially when presented well. Again this is why people need to be forced to do some real RP heavy D&D once in a while.

And that, right here, is where you do incorrect comparisons in my opinion.
Now, I presume you like the storytelling aspects of RPing, right?
So, to play out your character in the frame of a nice, thought-out Plot.

But imagine the DM would gather you and your group for a session of good ol' D&D, you whip out your character sheets, and then the DM starts reading the entirety of Salvatores Dri'zzt cycle, and asks you afterwards if his campaign was any good... What would your answer be?

One of the basic premises of visual media is and always has been "Show, not Tell.", and that's where MGS4 seems to fall short.

And another one, while I'm at it:
You said that Halo's flaws are in the design. You're right there, as far as I'm concerned. BUT: How is MGS4 any different? A Game that you don't play, or loose more than half of it's content by skipping cutscenes... this is no mere design flaw in that the GAME design is flawed, that's more like the whole premise, it's design as a game is flawed. Compare: A flat tire is flawed (Halo, and it's not only flat, but also made of banana mush...), but if the tire is rectangular, it's not even a tire anymore (MGS4).

And, for the protocol, I flaming HATE Halo. With a passion.

 

[TerraMGP]

I personally prefer Yahtzee bashing games. Most reviewers seem to try so hard to be objective that they fail to point out the things that are wrong with the game. Note the Gamespot MGS4 review, which said absolutely nothing bad about it except that it might confuse people who haven't played the previous games. They don't point out any flaws, just what the game does right, then assign an arbitrary number score.

And that is the problem. He does not bash games because everything in them is bash worth, he takes popular games and starts to bash them because thats what you want to see. Hence selling out. I agree mainstream reviewers sell out too much ot the fanboys who lap it up and buy the games with the biggest budget, but does he really have to go past the point of knocking them down a peg when needed to just harp on the games for things because he can? its not even a matter of not bashing them, its the bashing for its own sake

 

[GeeDave]

I was fully prepared for him to bash the game, and I have no problem with that, but the way he did it was not funny and lacked the charm of many of the other reviews.

I have no problem with him smacking the games I like around a bit, I just want to see it done in a way that covers REAL flaws. I don't want to see him just bash at the bad points he can find because he can. He should not have to sink that low.

Christ on a bike. First off... You preach about how Yahtzee is no good because "it's just his opinion"... which could be argued in itself (as was quite clearly, and always has stated facts as well). Then you go and give your own opinion on how it made you feel in comparison to other reviews. How pointless can you get? It's comments like yours that start arguments. I personaly loved this review, I think it's reminiscent of how Yahtzee started out.

Notice how I said "I think" in there... thus revealing that what I'm about to say is an opinion of my own. An ability that you seem to lack. I wouldn't even be replying if your post did not indicate fact without fact.

Lastly, you don't want to see him bash at bad points he finds because he can? What the? Go away then! EVERY critic does this. Have you not heard the old saying: "Those who can, do". It's his JOB to FIND FLAWS in GAMES, he's a CRITIC. You're too stupid to argue with.

 

[shadow skill]

Mspencer how do you explain complaints about the controls centered around things that are blatantly inaccurate? How do you explain "lack of emphasis on stealth..and game breaking super gun.." when the gun in question really doesn't take out people in one hit immedeatly unless you get them in the head, and doesn't have infinite ammo. (though you can buy as much as you like when you gain access to Drebin.) How do you explain that? Instead of crying about fanboy this and fanboy that explain those things first.

I don't have to explain them, it's not my review.

Yet you feel free to accuse people of fanboyism or actions usually attributed to fanboys for disagreeing with some of Yahtzee's statements about the game. I mean at the end of the day he could have argued that the Drebin point system makes the game too easy especially in light of certain glitches in the game with respect to respawning enemies. I was expecting Yahtzee to bag on Raiden hard in this review I mean the guy wears high heels, that has got to be great material for a guy like Yahtzee.

 

[Proto Cloud]

final fantasy? dungeons and dragons? shut up!

and stop giving Yahtzee breaks.

this is his first review that is at least 90% fail.
and it follows up with a ninja gaiden preview.
he is at this moment, no doubt, walking around with a bag full of white-and-green condoms for all the 360 fanboys who want to ravenously suck his dick.

Wrong. He has harshly criticized both Halo 3, Bioshock, Mass Effect, and in the context of other reviews Gears of War and Dead Rising. He is not a 360 fanboy, but he does have a instant gratification attitude of 360 fanboys.

Anyway, how did this get off-topic? Why are there people talking about D&D of all things? I thought people stopped playing that after Y2K.

mspencer: please stop trying to make yourself look cool by making dry, sarcastic replies with no backing to them. It's getting old.

 

[VMerken]

And yes, I realize he is creating a product, and he is letting more and more of his convictions about games, at least from what his work and his earlier videos have shown us, color that product to make it so more people will like it. Hence the DEFINITION of selling out. And yes you can sell out to the Indie crowd, Hell what is hot topic?

"Selling out" is seen as gaining success at the cost of *credibility*. Since there is no credibility in video game reviewing to begin with, there is no "selling out". In his video series, I don't remember Yahtzee telling us that he is this video gaming prophet who has come down from the mountain holding stone tablets with the Ten Ultimate Commandments of Video Gaming which he then clearly outlined for us to follow like a religion.

I see someone who thought up a "video game review" concept that attracts viewers, then gradually streamlines it via experiments (such as trying to include footage from himself, or dubbing video game cut scenes) to what he wants it to be and earn more and more $$$ while doing so. Nothing wrong with that and if you don't like it, seek entertainment or "guidance" whatever you want elsewhere.

 

[TerraMGP]

You have somehow totally bypassed my point. I have been saying he is acting like a hypocrit for bashing games that, story wise, have the exact same elements as games HE HIMSELF has produced.

 

[karpiel]

While I'm not about to argue for his objectivity, I think his anti-mainstream-game message is a welcome change of pace in the cesspool that is the modern game industry.

 

[Yahtzee Croshaw]

If MGS was an Adventure game like the Chzo series, then perhaps extended cutscenes and all the extra detail they provide would be appropriate. In purported "Tactical Espionage Action" game it just seems out of place at best.

Heck, if the MGS storyline was cleaned up and presented in a book, or trilogy, and sold, I'd shell out 10 dollars (30 for a trilogy). If we tack on the visual aspect, are the cutscenes that much better than the price of admission for a movie? Is the story in this installment so good, that it's 2-3 times the cost of the very same book and movie? Is the last aspect of it, the gameplay, enough to bridge that gap?

In regards to Yahtzee's consistency in reviewing, or lack thereof, we each must be taking something different away from his videos. His primary modus operandi has always been to criticize what the game got wrong.

Also, Terra, you've accused Yahtzee of: "he does not give a damn about what others think and just sticks to his guns"; and: "color [his] product to make it so more people will like it". So he's selling out if he never changes, and selling out if he does. Where exactly does 'not selling out' lie?

 

[MGS4_FTW]

Great review. Was predictable, but still funny. Obviously you're not a fan, but i still like seeing a POV from the other side of the fence.

I've got each Metal Gear Solid title, including the twin snakes remake and the original Metal Gear and Metal Gear 2: Solid Snake. I've always been a fan, and always will be. One of the things i love the most about the 'solid' series are the cut scenes. They give the story depth. i love that.

Keep up the good work!!

BTW, is it me or is the forum mod/admin a little trigger happy with the ol' ban stick? I've seen people getting banned for saying things like "f*cking awesome, blah blah blah" and getting a perma ban, but then another poster writing "you're all w@nkers" and getting a 2 week one... wtf? hardly fair? One guy got banned for saying Yartzee must have played on easy as harder settings have less ammo. Wtf is up with that?

$10 says I get a ban…

 

[VMerken]

You have somehow totally bypassed my point. I have been saying he is acting like a hypocrit for bashing games that, story wise, have the exact same elements as games HE HIMSELF has produced.

Yes, games he himself produced BEFORE his video game reviews (unless he made a new one very recently, in which case I apologise for my ignorance), thus BEFORE the streamlining process, etc... began.

 

[Techni]

The tranquilizer gun only has infinite ammo on easy, you run out quite often on normal. So what difficulty did he play on? Cause it explains a lot about his review

 

[skip_it_also]

How can anyone complain about excellent dialoge in a movie, or for that matter excellent story telling. Kojima really hit the mark with this title. He created an excellent game with an unbelievable story. Each and every character in this game were compelling, dynamic, and a essential part to the metal gear storyline. Not one minute of this games cut-scenes were boreing (which they are skippable by the way). I played all the games in the series when it was brought to the playstation, except for the third (I dont know just never got around to it) but it was ok because the game filled me in on anything and everything i wanted to know. By the way the controls are top-notch, and for Yatzee to say otherwise leads me to wonder if he bothered to look at the briefing or even tried the vr training where you can easily pratice all of the moves in the game. I know Yatzee wants to be funny and bash games because hes a critic afterall, but come on allready. This game is flawless, play it for yourself and see what you think.

 

[mynameisob3l]

i cried when i realized the ninja gaiden thing was just an ad.

kept waiting for it to become a spoof.

 

[TerraMGP]

Great review. Was predictable, but still funny. Obviously you're not a fan, but i still like seeing a POV from the other side of the fence.

I've got each Metal Gear Solid title, including the twin snakes remake and the original Metal Gear and Metal Gear 2: Solid Snake. I've always been a fan, and always will be. One of the things i love the most about the 'solid' series are the cut scenes. They give the story depth. i love that.

Keep up the good work!!

BTW, is it me or is the forum mod/admin a little trigger happy with the ol' ban stick? I've seen people getting banned for saying things like "f*cking awesome, blah blah blah" and getting a perma ban, but then another poster writing "you're all w@nkers" and getting a 2 week one... wtf? hardly fair? One guy got banned for saying Yartzee must have played on easy as harder settings have less ammo. Wtf is up with that?

$10 says I get a ban…

Why does it matter what kind of game it was? Honestly people need to move out of this mind set. Why on earth would you not expect a Hideo game to be like this, especially the last one in a series he has worked on so much?

You have somehow totally bypassed my point. I have been saying he is acting like a hypocrit for bashing games that, story wise, have the exact same elements as games HE HIMSELF has produced.

Yes, games he himself produced BEFORE his video game reviews (unless he made a new one very recently, in which case I apologise for my ignorance), thus BEFORE the streamlining process, etc... began.

Again what does it matter, Unless his gaming habbits and ideas about games have TOTALLY pulled a 180 their is no logic in that statement, even then his flip flopping shows that he just goes back and forth rather than staying on one side of the road or the other.

 

[CTU_Agent24]

Did he spoil the plot? Need to know before i watch?

 

[Magugag]

It's... been made pretty clear that the game Yahtzee made was of an utterly different genre that Metal Gear Solid and in no way proclaimed itself to be a tactical action title, a game of a sort where large amounts of storytelling are a key part of the type of game it is. Seriously, you seem to ignore that every time it comes up.