The game League of Legends is just a game that isn't starter player friendly
and the so called "dick-weeds" are just people who either are in fact just dick-weeds or worked there ass off and want more and more challenges.
Though I do agree the player database almost 90% of the time sound...
I don't think you see the point people like free stuff if they started charging for the internet a lot of people would just drop use of the internet on the ps3 and just because they can afford to make improvements doesn't mean they will. I think its alright the way it is. Another point is that...
Then shouldn't gamers be ready for mistakes and just get past them just from numbers of bad game experiences. Plus as I stated before when People hate a game some people love the same game its just a matter of opinion.
Id have to say no to reviewing every patch that would come out to a game but Id still have to say that we should give games a second chance and maybe give the a re-review but maybe only do reviews on major patches not on every single patch that would come out on one game you would be reviewing...
have you tried looking at the games from when you download project 64 they're are alot of games on that that may spark some interest in them it has alot of button mashing involved
I agree with Salem on this. Not all games come out with bugs or other issues and when companies do promise to fix it in a month and then dont does not mean they dont care about the input of the players or that they are not working on it, it just means that they might be busy making or releasing...
What they could do is give it a main score then break that down to sound/music, gameplay, length/replay ability, graphics categories that get other ranked separately. So you can tell the games strength and weaknesses.
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.