Yeah, and so do the mediocre graphics and horrible animations in normal conversations, and aggravating boss fights, and odd "choose your own adventure" ending.Ubermetalhed said:One reason why it won't.
DEUS EX HUMAN REVOLUTION.
Seriously the effort and care that has gone into the new Deus Ex needs to be acknowledged.
It'll be a travesty if it doesn't win something.ZeroMachine said:Yeah, and so do the mediocre graphics and horrible animations in normal conversations, and aggravating boss fights, and odd "choose your own adventure" ending.Ubermetalhed said:One reason why it won't.
DEUS EX HUMAN REVOLUTION.
Seriously the effort and care that has gone into the new Deus Ex needs to be acknowledged.
... That being said, DE:HR is my favorite game of all time, I love the art style, think the boss fights are easy as long as you pack a couple frag mines and invest in the anti-electrocution aug, love the boss-fight conversations, and loved the endings. But enough people had those complaints that I highly doubt it will win any major GOTY awards.
Except Skyrim hasn't been hyped for a decade, and that Bethesda has actually made 4 great RPGs in less time than in took to release Duke Nukem Forever. I, for one am glad that there is an animation for walking diagonally this time around. If Skyrim is anything like Oblivion, Fallout 3 and Fallout: New Vegas, (and judging from the 30 minutes demo it will surpass them) it's a preorder for me. Also, what the OT mean by the duel-wield system is that you can pick and choose any one handed weapon, shield or spell and use them together. Finally I can be a Mage that holds a shield at the same time. Robes are for suckers. Who ever thought they were good protection? Also, being able to change weapon like in Fallout without being completely blinded by the pip-boy sounds great. I like games with an active pause system like that. The sleek, transparent menus look gorgeous.harvz said:how many people said duke nukem forever looked to be a great game...
And only CoD fans invent a name like fucking 'Battlefags'. You're not ten fucking years old, dude.DragonLord Seth said:Because only Battlefags will take every opportunity to flame CoD.Frostbite3789 said:What the hell did any of that have to do with BF3? Way to try to start a flame war. High five!42 said:I take it you're a BF3 fan then?
In all seriousness though MW3 is looking way more entertaining then BF3.
I've seen it happen it was really cool. I am looking forward to Skyrim and hope it is good.No_Remainders said:I have one question.
Has ANY of this been proven? Until it has, I'm going to call shenanigans.During a battle you?re having with wandering giants, a dragon swoops in and before you have a chance to react, picks up the giant up and pulls him hundreds of feet in the air before dropping him to his death.
The dragon then flies off, slowly arcs around and thuds down in front of you before snorting fire your way while the screen is still shaking. A nearby adventurer gets involved and while the fight is going on, the dragon snaps at him, eats him and throws the body away with a quick yank of his head, the adventurer?s shield and sword sent flying. All this happens while the battle continues in real time without any obvious sign of the scripting. It is a genuinely jaw-dropping moment.
Yeah so different from the point your gun and shoot till they die systemSoopaSte123 said:I've never liked the Elder Scrolls combat system. "Swing your sword back and forth till the enemy dies" is not fun. I could do magic, sure, but I've always been a melee guy. Unless Skyrim has a MUCH improved combat system, I don't care if it's Game of the Year or Game of the Century, I'm not buying it.
I have only one plan when the game is released.Cridhe said:It's not out yet, nobody has even played it and it's already being rated game of the year. It's the top rated game when I turn on my 360.
Damnit people, seriously. Wait until the game is out to make that call.
Edit: This is not a hate post, I will be picking up a copy of the game myself. But come on people calm down, it's not out yet.
I think my brain hurts at that statement. Your point was BF 3 will be more fun than MW 3. This doesn't prove your point. Really as much as like BF games you really did bring in the flame war yourself by going out of your way to slag CoD. It was quite unnecessary. Just as unnecessary as the battlefag comment mind you.Frostbite3789 said:Way to break the mold average CoD fan!DragonLord Seth said:Because only Battlefags will take every opportunity to flame CoD.Frostbite3789 said:What the hell did any of that have to do with BF3? Way to try to start a flame war. High five!42 said:I take it you're a BF3 fan then?
In all seriousness though MW3 is looking way more entertaining then BF3.
And you know...prove my point.