Quoting for truth. How is it no one on the other side remembers that the ESRB exists?Electrogecko said:"What we've learned from this poll is that parents want to be the ones who decide which games their kids play, not the videogame industry.".........oh. I wasn't aware that "the industry" decides what we play.
just like what south park said about parents being overly-concerned about whats on TV because they rely on it as a baby-sitter and mentor to their kids.Mornelithe said:This poll clearly shows once again, parents giving more control to the government, because they refuse to be parents. Grow up, it's not the government, or societies job to make sure your kids acquiesce to your rules. That's your job.
This.Mornelithe said:This poll clearly shows once again, parents giving more control to the government, because they refuse to be parents. Grow up, it's not the government, or societies job to make sure your kids acquiesce to your rules. That's your job.
WHOA! Did you see "Food, Inc." and "Supersize Me", too? I love those movies...Dexter111 said:Uhm... but they kind of did, it's not an "individual" problem but a cultural one e.g.:sinestro1940 said:This kind of reminds me of the whole "McDonald's has made me fat" thing. No, McDonald's did not make you fat, you made you fat. "Video games turned my son into a killer!" No, you turned your son into a killer. As a parent, it is YOUR duty to control what your kids play, and to actually look up and do research on a game you may have suspicions on.
![]()
and the big "food companies" that feed whole populations like cattle the cheapest way possible, even if it means that large parts of the food is full of chemicals and flavor enhancers while "healthy" food gets more and more expensive and even unattainable for certain groups of people (or only in special places) are as responsible as the people who can't restrain themselves... there desperately needs to be some instance controlling and ensuring healthy food (especially in the US) as there (now luckily is) to the consequences of smoking or certain drugs etc. cause it can be about as harmful in the long run.
Are you trying to say that said game companies aren't responsible for the content they put in games? It's not like it is a byproduct of "open world games" in most cases cause there needs to be special code and animations etc. for most of that stuff. One of the examples (Postal 2) doesn't even really have a main story, it says something along the lines of "get milk" or something and lets the player loose in the world... I'm pretty sure the goal or the object of the game isn't to get milk.
You realize that it's almost certain that the opposite would happen, right? The reasons have already been explained a few times in this thread, feel free to go back and dig them up. But if you seriously think that this unprecedented attack on protected speech in the United States would somehow herald a renaissance in mature game development... well sir, you're a greater optimist than I.Dexter111 said:I can only see positives about this thing passing (aside of maybe some game companies that rely on heavy gore and their "cool factor" on "young adults" decrease in sales) games can finally be classified as and actually contain adult content (Showtime-like?) and they wouldn't have to be watered down in certain areas (usually sex in the US) because "children could get their hands on it" and it would finally also put the responsibility of the games children play on their parents or other adults when kids wouldn't be able to buy said products anymore (similar to smokes and alcohol).
So you're willing to trash the First Amendment because this kid's mother is a failed parent?odanhammer said:I know a pre-teen who is 13 currently , he has been playing games like 50 cent and gta as soon as his mother can purchase them
They didn't post it, they provided me with a full copy of the poll results. What you read is what I got.Calatar said:Where did Common Sense Media post this?