[/spoiler]
This isn't about ninjas, or Muslim women, or Allah---well, not directly. See, France banned the wearing of full-length Muslim veils a couple of days ago, continuing to take what can be seen as a hard line on reining in their Muslim population.
I live in the United States. My country's religious intolerance has reached a point where even Mahmoud Ahmadinejad felt it necessary to stand up for the bulk of my countrymen. Seriously. Mahmoud Ahmadinejad is talking sense. [http://www.deathandtaxesmag.com/28405/ahmadinejad-islamic-countries-not-against-america/] And in the process he's probably saving American lives as fighters in the region take his counsel, which is more than Rev. Terry Jones (who ought to be shot as an enemy combatant for causing US soldier deaths in Afghanistan) can say for himself.
France, meanwhile? Poking the dog with a stick and seeing if it will bite. Europe is supposed to be this enlightened place, yet France quite possibly leads the world in religious intolerance. Not that I mind---anything that takes the heat off the good ol' USA can only be a good thing, but seriously, people.
[b]For discussion:[/b] Aw, fuck it. Open thread. About ninjas, Muslims, and ninjas fighting for Allah.[/QUOTE]
How ironic that you speak of the intollerance of others in such an equally bigotted manner...this is why we never seem to make progress in finding a middle ground. Founded statements that are not merely over-generalizations or hyperbole and a lack of little less demeaning tone will go a long way.
While certain actions of provocation are contemptable, we must also be examining the reasoning behind some of them. If a person walks around with thier face covered in my neck of the woods, often they are up to trouble (they do not want to be IDed)...it is unfortunate that this is in conflict with Islamic tradition. However, France does not have our Constitution or Bill of Rights, so if you dont like thier policy, dont live or do buisness there. I dont think they are "reigning in the muslim population" so much as covering security detail. I would look into what arguments were on the floor for passing such a law before assuming that must be the case.
Personally I do not think America is as intollerant as you say, it is simply that the loudest assholes tent to make headlines. If one man kills 1000 children and 5 million people do not, that one man makes the news. Also, why is Europe more enlightened...so far as I see, they make as many mistakes as any other civilized peoples.
Terry Jones has the right to do as he pleases in religious expression, political protest, etc. and that is his right since he lives in the USA. Spouting that he should be shot isnt productive. What would be is a concerted effort by fellow Christians to expose his behavior as decidedly UNchristian and undermine his following as they realize he leads them astray. Law does not enforce tact, but social pressure does.[/quote]
It is not Terry Jones' decision to burn a Quran (which yes, he did retract, but only under very heavy pressure) that makes me say he should be shot dead where he stands.
His decision, picked up by the media and learned about in the Arab world, led to at least 14 confirmed casualties when Afghan rebels used it as a rallying cry for an attack on a US military post in Afghanistan. It was an attack caused directly by Jones's actions, making him no better than an enemy combatant. As the saying goes, "if you don't want to stand behind our troops, feel free to stand in front of them."
Terry Jones rendered aid to the enemy in wartime (indirect aid, but aid nonetheless) leading to the death of soldiers on our side. He is a despicable, disgusting man, and sometimes it's necessary to make an example of such a person. A public execution might undo some of the damage---although as I mentioned, even [i]Mahmoud Fucking Ahmadinejad[/i] felt it necessary to say something![/quote]
Isnt public executions to coerce people to thinking/acting the way we want them to the tool of the enemies of our troops are facing? It does us no good to become the evil we fight. Though Jones should contemplate his part in those deaths, first address on this should be to the people who did the killing. Jones' comments do not remove the free wills of those men, they made thier choice. They decided for themselves to kill in response to incivility. Frankly the choice to kill over being offended is far more contemptable than to offend someone over people killing.