Khell_Sennet said:
If the examples of what you posted are what "proper" twittering is supposed to be, it's still senseless crap which only lifeless nobodys give a damn about. And you say it's a form of communication, but it isn't. There's no response, no rebuttal or affirmation. There is no conversing, just spouting random nothing into the (digital) air.
If you didn't find my examples very interesting, that reflects on my writing, not the platform. Maybe it was a mistake to include examples, because I didn't intend to say 'this is the right way to use Twitter'. It's just a writing space; there's no such thing as the 'proper' way to use it. People use it in all different kinds of ways. For example, sometime Escapist contributor Colin Roswell is writing a serial novel called Orpheus Corpse [http://twitter.com/orpheuscorpse]. (Russ Pitts finished one a couple of months ago too - scroll down a bit. [http://twitter.com/russpitts]) But you don't have to use it for creative writing any more than you have to use it for telling everyone what you're doing right now. A lot of people use it mostly for link-sharing - which incidentally was what the first blogs were used for.
There are responses, rebuttals, affirmations and conversing. In fact, for a lot of people the majority of what they do on Twitter is respond to and chat with other people. Whether someone has specifically asked 'Does anyone know about this?' or just said something you find interesting, you can send them a message (public or private). If you're browsing someone's Twitter updates and see a post that begins with '
@name', that's recognised by the software as a public message or reply to the named person, and it appears in their Twitter feed whether or not they're following the person. (By default, your own feed doesn't include these messages from friends to other people that you're not following, to cut down on clutter.)
I'm not saying it's great, I'm saying it's neutral. Whether it's good or bad depends entirely on the people whose writing you follow. Seeing all these people complaining about how awful it is makes me want to facepalm, because they don't understand that. Or maybe none of these people will ever like short-form writing, but that doesn't make it bad, it just means it's not
for them.
Imagine you were on a hairdressing forum for some reason, and you saw a thread called 'Does anyone else think videogames are stupid?' And all the responses were variations on 'Yeah my little sister has a Wiibox or whatever and it's dumb, it's just a picture of a person moving around, what's the point of that?' or 'I tried playing games once and I played the Open Season game and the Charlie & the Chocolate Factory game and they were stupid! Games are stupid!' or 'I turned on my friend's PS3 and it just had a menu on the screen and I watched it for ten minutes and nothing else happened!' or even 'I've never played a game but I think they're dumb'. That's what this thread looks like to me.