I hope it gets thrown out, loli or not!ph0b0s123 said:I just hope they are not pursuing some innocuous manga title and actually have found something of the loli variety.
It's not fucking REAL.
I hope it gets thrown out, loli or not!ph0b0s123 said:I just hope they are not pursuing some innocuous manga title and actually have found something of the loli variety.
Sorry, but it doesn't sound like you really know what innocent until proven guilty means. I've seen you say this before in the thread and I thought the same then.EverythingIncredible said:I say we go the way of "Innocent until proven guilty" on this issue and not arrest him for it.SillyBear said:It's way, way more complicated than saying "these are fake children so it is all okay!". We just don't know if there truly is a victim or not. Japanese animated child pornography could be creating a dangerous environment for children. It could be sending out a dangerous rhetoric to its readers and influencing society in a thousand ways.EverythingIncredible said:It endangers the lives of others.SillyBear said:You know, most incidents of speeding don't end up with any damage to property or person. Should only the few speeding incidents that result in death or injury be considered crimes?sravankb said:If there are no victims for an activity, then it isn't a crime. End of discussion.
How does having manga depicting children in sexual acts put anyone in harm's way? What's so bad about it?
Or it could be completely harmless and only influences the fantasy world that it is set in.
We just don't know, and we can't take a side until we do.
heres something to help with your opinion confusion: if peadophiles are jailed, they have to be put in special secure wings of the prison, because some of the murderers have children. you do the maths. hint: they get attacked a lot.lunncal said:This is actually a really difficult thing for me to form a solid opinion on.
On the one hand actual child porn is clearly wrong, and people who posses it should be jailed for a long time.
I agree. There's a rather large chasm between the two and since I don't see that anyone has brought this question up yet I will (excuse me if someone has and I didn't notice), what the hell was he reading? If it's any normal Manga than it could be easily resolved, but if it WAS hentai than... could they still arrest him if it wasn't CP? (those two are actual questions I would like an answer to if anyone can)A-D. said:So what constitutes Child Porn in a Manga then? I mean, just being "underage" doesnt really count, and as far as im concerned, Manga do not contain Porn. Well Ecchi perhaps (accidental boobgrab, pantyshots etc) but thats about it and even those dont really contain children
I'd wish People would start seeing the difference between Hentai (Drawn Porn) and Manga (Drawn but not Porn) already. Else you just mention you read Manga to anyone and they think you are into some sick perversion or whatever.
... They aren't crimes in a situation where no one gets hurt just ticket-able and fine-able offenses.SillyBear said:You know, most incidents of speeding don't end up with any damage to property or person. Should only the few speeding incidents that result in death or injury be considered crimes?sravankb said:If there are no victims for an activity, then it isn't a crime. End of discussion.
No chance of hurting others? Bullshit. You don't know that. Let me just quote something I've already said to someone making the exact point you are making here:NightlyNews said:... They aren't crimes in a situation where no one gets hurt just ticket-able and fine-able offenses.SillyBear said:You know, most incidents of speeding don't end up with any damage to property or person. Should only the few speeding incidents that result in death or injury be considered crimes?sravankb said:If there are no victims for an activity, then it isn't a crime. End of discussion.
Also your comparing a situation that can hurt someone to one that has no chance of affecting others.
edit: Like I said earlier, this man could actually have a criminal connection to this manga comic. We just don't know. Let the police do their fucking job and shut up.SillyBear said:It's way, way more complicated than saying "these are fake children so it is all okay!". We just don't know if there truly is a victim or not. Japanese animated child pornography could be creating a dangerous environment for children. It could be sending out a dangerous rhetoric to its readers and influencing society in a thousand ways.
Or it could be completely harmless and only influences the fantasy world that it is set in.
We just don't know, and we can't take a side until we do.
What the law says is crime is what crime is. It has been said that courts are courts of law not justice. And as Aristotle said, "Law is the correct judgement of the state."sravankb said:If there are no victims for an activity, then it isn't a crime. End of discussion.
I would count it as under-aged porn. I'm not basing age off what the hentai says the age is but what age the character appears to be. If its porn and the characters 'engaging' don't look anything close to grown then yes, its kiddie porn.GrimHeaper said:There is a hypothetical 5000 year old witch that looks 13 in a hentai.t3h br0th3r said:I also have to ask: What did he get caught with and how old those the person(s) look in whatever manga he had?Richard Po said:I think this just brings the question of "what is porn"?
If he got stopped for Ranma 1/2 or High School of the Dead then I call bull, but if he got caught with something that depicts what are clearly under-aged looking characters (aka no reasonable human being could say they look anything close 18 or older) then I have no sympothy for him.
If you visit Ms. Rosy Palmer while watching kids you need to be kept in jail where you wouldn't ruin anyone's lives.
Would it count as under-aged porn?
They aren't allow to censor it, as in they can't stop news reporters from covering it.bob1052 said:So how about what I wrote before:electric_warrior said:Yes it is, its a form of expression that is deemed illegal. It is, therefore, an issue of freedom of expression.bob1052 said:Censorship of something deemed illegal is not related to the censorship of art.
If I want to walk down to my local coffee shop and shoot everyone because its my artistic expression the government shouldn't censor it (stop me)?
Its a form of expression. Why can't I have freedom of expression?
They aren't censoring this guys Hentai (if it even is Hentai), they are just stopping him for breaking the law.NightlyNews said:They aren't allow to censor it, as in they can't stop news reporters from covering it.bob1052 said:So how about what I wrote before:electric_warrior said:Yes it is, its a form of expression that is deemed illegal. It is, therefore, an issue of freedom of expression.bob1052 said:Censorship of something deemed illegal is not related to the censorship of art.
If I want to walk down to my local coffee shop and shoot everyone because its my artistic expression the government shouldn't censor it (stop me)?
Its a form of expression. Why can't I have freedom of expression?
But, they most definitely can and will stop you for breaking the law. Censorship and enforcing the law should, but aren't always separated.
I honestly just think your exaggerating so hard that you lost your point/trolling because your statement is so obviously false, but in case you aren't there's the facts.
LOL wut?lordlillen said:![]()
in the name of the knights who say ni not this shit again, a similar thing happened not to long ago in my country and it was equaly as stupid then actually i think it was stupider because it was about yu-gi-oh.
Imma guess Dark Magician Girl.Marik2 said:LOL wut?
How does yugioh count as child porn?
Thats an abstract view of "hurting people" and is obviously not defended by courts. Same reason why art or statements like fuck jews can't be prosecuted unless it is specifically inciting a crime i.e. meet me on this street at this time to kill black people or something like that.SillyBear said:No chance of hurting others? Bullshit. You don't know that. Let me just quote something I've already said to someone making the exact point you are making here:NightlyNews said:... They aren't crimes in a situation where no one gets hurt just ticket-able and fine-able offenses.SillyBear said:You know, most incidents of speeding don't end up with any damage to property or person. Should only the few speeding incidents that result in death or injury be considered crimes?sravankb said:If there are no victims for an activity, then it isn't a crime. End of discussion.
Also your comparing a situation that can hurt someone to one that has no chance of affecting others.
edit: Like I said earlier, this man could actually have a criminal connection to this manga comic. We just don't know. Let the police do their fucking job and shut up.SillyBear said:It's way, way more complicated than saying "these are fake children so it is all okay!". We just don't know if there truly is a victim or not. Japanese animated child pornography could be creating a dangerous environment for children. It could be sending out a dangerous rhetoric to its readers and influencing society in a thousand ways.
Or it could be completely harmless and only influences the fantasy world that it is set in.
We just don't know, and we can't take a side until we do.
Considering the only source we have so far in this thread is from the side that will obviously have heavy bias in their journalism I think that the lack of information regarding what manga it was is a bad omen.cursedseishi said:I love how everyone here is just instantly assuming the manga he had on him was the worst possible form it could be. I have yet to see anything about WHAT manga he had on his digital person, so lets just cut the crap about guessing that "since Canada said it was porn, it must be porn". I've seen more than my fair share of odd cover art for Manga, so who knows if this was an assumption based on just the cover, or if they actually bothered to look through it.
Am I saying it wasn't though, no. I'm plenty sure there IS manga that are borderline CP around, and I'm sure people around the world know about and look at them.
No, I am saying that your horribly weak counter point wasn't worth countering and was honestly counter-productive.bob1052 said:You are trying to claim that something that was deemed illegal is art and therefore shouldn't be deemed illegal.t3h br0th3r said:hyperbole:If I want to walk down to my local coffee shop and shoot everyone because its my artistic expression the government shouldn't censor it (stop me)?
1.obvious and intentional exaggeration.
2.an extravagant statement or figure of speech not intended to be taken literally, as ?to wait an eternity.?
3. not helpful in discussions of ethics
The difficult thing about this kind of disicussion isn't defining porn (everyone over tha ge 12 knows what that is) but defining what is art, what is not art, and if something known and agreed to be art is worth protecting.
Now you are drawing imaginary lines in the sand so that your reasoning works and mine doesn't when I do the exact same thing as you in a different magnitude.
Not to mention you can't even disprove my horribly weak counterpoint but instead you create a fake dictionary definition instead, its actually quite hilarious how bad you are at back and forth discussions.