Damn it! Now I just hurt more for not getting around to seeing Slumdog Millionaire. I will go and pre-order it right now on Amazon, that'll appease Danny Boyle.
Now THAT was an epic rant. Concise, enraged...SimuLord said:The Oscars are a gigantic circle jerk for an industry that is a cancer on the intellectual landscape. It siphons public attention away from issues that matter into a magical fairyland where Brad Fucking Pitt and his gutter slut wife are the center of the universe and we can all just happily go to the cinema, that is, if our dollar's worth enough that anyone can afford a night out with a deepening economic depression and a government that seems to think that a $533 billion dollar deficit is somehow a noble goal to which it's supposed to inspire (although, relative to a balanced budget and fiscal responsibility it gives whole new meaning to the term "close enough for government work".)
Seconded. If there was a "Biggest Prick" Oscar, he would win it every year.minoes said:I hate Sean Penn so much.
Sorry, but I never said he was a bad actor.j-e-f-f-e-r-s said:Really? As an actor, I think he's fantastic. Haven't seen either Milk or The Wrestler, so I'm not in any position to comment whether he's better than Mickey Rourke or not. However, in all the other films I've seen him in, he's never been anything less than amazing. Plus, he's one of the few big name actors in Hollywood with any kind of integrity. He only does films he thinks are actually worth being in. When was the last time you saw him in a crappy franchise blockbuster? Sure, not all his films have been great, but he's made his name by playing proper roles, and that's increasingly rare in Hollywood these days.minoes said:I hate Sean Penn so much.
You do have a point, there are so many films/directors/actors that will never win an Oscar just because they aren't traditional style and yet a shitty feel good film won the sme amount as gone with the wind.zombiepandaman said:What happened Slumdog wasn't a bad movie but it wasn't a good movie same for Benjamin Button. Really the only justice served tonight is that walle won and not Bolt. Where is batman the real movie of the year, it seems there is to many movie snobs voting and they just don't like comic book movies.
Slumdog had exceptional cinematography imo and its a script based on a book. Its a unique way of telling an underdog story. Its interesting, compelling and nicely directed by Boyle.Mazty said:Slumdog Millionare did not deserve to win 8 oscars, and will be quickly fogotten about. It's an average feel-good movie, but with a cultural twist. Feels like supporting the underdog, not the good movies of '08.
The Wrestler & Frost/Nixon were much better, but the opposite of Slumdog. The Wrestler is a realistic movie about what life is like, not a cheery coincidene ridden story of rags-to-riches. Frost/Nixon is about the Watergate Scandel, not exactly a pleasent memory for some. Camera work was average, script was average (sometimes terrible) in Slumdog. All in all, a very forgettable movie that feels like it should have been released a decade ago with the Millionare hype. Personally I don't think it'll stand the test of time, whereas the others that were up for nominations will.
Why does it always have to be beleiveable? Why can't people escape into a happy candy-cane land once in a while? And more importantly, why does automatically disqaulify it from being a great film?Mazty said:The cinematography was bland; it wasn't trying to do anything new I felt. Very run-of-the-mill, standard shots, all it did was show us parts of India that had never graced the movies before, which is where I think people give it undue credit. Whereas the Dark Knight would have been much more deserving for the much better angles, lighting etc, but being a comicbook based movie, that is of course a no-no.clicklick said:Slumdog had exceptional cinematography imo and its a script based on a book. Its a unique way of telling an underdog story. Its interesting, compelling and nicely directed by Boyle.
The Wrestler is a good film but somehow it felt a bit monotonous which I think is intentional as to portray the final stage of the main character. I was more gunning for Marisa Tomei to win the nod for supporting actress...she was great and so to was Rourke.
But it wasn't too gritty/depressing nor it was a feel good movie...so I guess to win Oscars, you gotta be in the extremes![]()
The problem with the underdog story is it's rediculous. An underdog story should be believable. Are the viewers really meant to believe that the questions were perfect and that a infant friendship somehow turns into love? Actually that one really baffled me, they hadn't seen each other for years, they really that retarded to think they love one another? I really wasn't compelled to watch it because of the feel-good theme running through it. Something nice and happy and utterly rediculous was going to happen to make the world a nice happy candy-cane land.
A feel good movie should be of the calibre of The Shawshank Redemption. Not a absurd storyline which simply gives the viewers the happy ending they wanted, not a real ending e.g. The Wrestler.
Plus in my opinion, The Wrestler was depressing enough to be a winner, not to mention it was "real", it felt like it captured the life of a man who no longer fit in the world. Slumdog I feel is just a lazy way of getting people to like a movie through making them feel good.
Slumdog showed India better than any movie I have seen...including Bollywood movies !Mazty said:The cinematography was bland; it wasn't trying to do anything new I felt. Very run-of-the-mill, standard shots, all it did was show us parts of India that had never graced the movies before, which is where I think people give it undue credit. Whereas the Dark Knight would have been much more deserving for the much better angles, lighting etc, but being a comicbook based movie, that is of course a no-no.
The problem with the underdog story is it's rediculous. An underdog story should be believable. Are the viewers really meant to believe that the questions were perfect and that a infant friendship somehow turns into love? Actually that one really baffled me, they hadn't seen each other for years, they really that retarded to think they love one another? I really wasn't compelled to watch it because of the feel-good theme running through it. Something nice and happy and utterly rediculous was going to happen to make the world a nice happy candy-cane land.
A feel good movie should be of the calibre of The Shawshank Redemption. Not a absurd storyline which simply gives the viewers the happy ending they wanted, not a real ending e.g. The Wrestler.
Plus in my opinion, The Wrestler was depressing enough to be a winner, not to mention it was "real", it felt like it captured the life of a man who no longer fit in the world. Slumdog I feel is just a lazy way of getting people to like a movie through making them feel good.
The Oscars received flak last year for being too gritty and depressing, which is why they probably chose Slumdog Millionaire as Best Picture; they needed to remedy that criticism. What was it Stewart said when considering the Best Picture nominees? "All I can say is thank God for teen pregnancy..." in reference to Juno's nomination (a film I hated, for the record).Steelfists said:-snip-Mazty said:-snip-clicklick said:-snip-