And the Oscar goes to...

Recommended Videos

Eagle Est1986

That One Guy
Nov 21, 2007
1,976
0
0
Damn it! Now I just hurt more for not getting around to seeing Slumdog Millionaire. I will go and pre-order it right now on Amazon, that'll appease Danny Boyle.
 

dalek sec

Leader of the Cult of Skaro
Jul 20, 2008
10,237
0
0
Glad WALL-E got the oscar and I'm shocked Ledge got it too, I remember hearing it would be a very long shot for him to get the award.
 

Auron555

New member
Jun 15, 2008
348
0
0
SimuLord said:
The Oscars are a gigantic circle jerk for an industry that is a cancer on the intellectual landscape. It siphons public attention away from issues that matter into a magical fairyland where Brad Fucking Pitt and his gutter slut wife are the center of the universe and we can all just happily go to the cinema, that is, if our dollar's worth enough that anyone can afford a night out with a deepening economic depression and a government that seems to think that a $533 billion dollar deficit is somehow a noble goal to which it's supposed to inspire (although, relative to a balanced budget and fiscal responsibility it gives whole new meaning to the term "close enough for government work".)
Now THAT was an epic rant. Concise, enraged...
The Oscar for Best Rant in an Internet Forum goes to SimuLord!
 

minoes

New member
Aug 28, 2008
584
0
0
j-e-f-f-e-r-s said:
minoes said:
I hate Sean Penn so much.
Really? As an actor, I think he's fantastic. Haven't seen either Milk or The Wrestler, so I'm not in any position to comment whether he's better than Mickey Rourke or not. However, in all the other films I've seen him in, he's never been anything less than amazing. Plus, he's one of the few big name actors in Hollywood with any kind of integrity. He only does films he thinks are actually worth being in. When was the last time you saw him in a crappy franchise blockbuster? Sure, not all his films have been great, but he's made his name by playing proper roles, and that's increasingly rare in Hollywood these days.
Sorry, but I never said he was a bad actor.

What I don´t like is that it seems, that the reason he won is because he was playing Harvey Milk.
 

new_age_reject

Lives in dactylic hexameter.
Dec 28, 2008
1,160
0
0
zombiepandaman said:
What happened Slumdog wasn't a bad movie but it wasn't a good movie same for Benjamin Button. Really the only justice served tonight is that walle won and not Bolt. Where is batman the real movie of the year, it seems there is to many movie snobs voting and they just don't like comic book movies.
You do have a point, there are so many films/directors/actors that will never win an Oscar just because they aren't traditional style and yet a shitty feel good film won the sme amount as gone with the wind.
 

SnowCold

New member
Oct 1, 2008
1,546
0
0
We needed to get Best Foreign Language Film of the Year!
Valse with Bashir kicked ass
 

clicklick

New member
Oct 29, 2008
126
0
0
Mazty said:
Slumdog Millionare did not deserve to win 8 oscars, and will be quickly fogotten about. It's an average feel-good movie, but with a cultural twist. Feels like supporting the underdog, not the good movies of '08.
The Wrestler & Frost/Nixon were much better, but the opposite of Slumdog. The Wrestler is a realistic movie about what life is like, not a cheery coincidene ridden story of rags-to-riches. Frost/Nixon is about the Watergate Scandel, not exactly a pleasent memory for some. Camera work was average, script was average (sometimes terrible) in Slumdog. All in all, a very forgettable movie that feels like it should have been released a decade ago with the Millionare hype. Personally I don't think it'll stand the test of time, whereas the others that were up for nominations will.
Slumdog had exceptional cinematography imo and its a script based on a book. Its a unique way of telling an underdog story. Its interesting, compelling and nicely directed by Boyle.

The Wrestler is a good film but somehow it felt a bit monotonous which I think is intentional as to portray the final stage of the main character. I was more gunning for Marisa Tomei to win the nod for supporting actress...she was great and so to was Rourke.

But it wasn't too gritty/depressing nor it was a feel good movie...so I guess to win Oscars, you gotta be in the extremes ;)
 

Jerious1154

New member
Aug 18, 2008
547
0
0
I'm just happy that Wall-E won, because that's the first animated movie that I've seen since Mulan that I genuinely enjoyed. It puts Ratatouille and Happy Feet to shame.
 

Steelfists

New member
Aug 6, 2008
439
0
0
Mazty said:
clicklick said:
Slumdog had exceptional cinematography imo and its a script based on a book. Its a unique way of telling an underdog story. Its interesting, compelling and nicely directed by Boyle.

The Wrestler is a good film but somehow it felt a bit monotonous which I think is intentional as to portray the final stage of the main character. I was more gunning for Marisa Tomei to win the nod for supporting actress...she was great and so to was Rourke.

But it wasn't too gritty/depressing nor it was a feel good movie...so I guess to win Oscars, you gotta be in the extremes ;)
The cinematography was bland; it wasn't trying to do anything new I felt. Very run-of-the-mill, standard shots, all it did was show us parts of India that had never graced the movies before, which is where I think people give it undue credit. Whereas the Dark Knight would have been much more deserving for the much better angles, lighting etc, but being a comicbook based movie, that is of course a no-no.
The problem with the underdog story is it's rediculous. An underdog story should be believable. Are the viewers really meant to believe that the questions were perfect and that a infant friendship somehow turns into love? Actually that one really baffled me, they hadn't seen each other for years, they really that retarded to think they love one another? I really wasn't compelled to watch it because of the feel-good theme running through it. Something nice and happy and utterly rediculous was going to happen to make the world a nice happy candy-cane land.
A feel good movie should be of the calibre of The Shawshank Redemption. Not a absurd storyline which simply gives the viewers the happy ending they wanted, not a real ending e.g. The Wrestler.
Plus in my opinion, The Wrestler was depressing enough to be a winner, not to mention it was "real", it felt like it captured the life of a man who no longer fit in the world. Slumdog I feel is just a lazy way of getting people to like a movie through making them feel good.
Why does it always have to be beleiveable? Why can't people escape into a happy candy-cane land once in a while? And more importantly, why does automatically disqaulify it from being a great film?
You seem to be implying that the members of the academy are snobs, yet you are one as well.
 

clicklick

New member
Oct 29, 2008
126
0
0
Mazty said:
The cinematography was bland; it wasn't trying to do anything new I felt. Very run-of-the-mill, standard shots, all it did was show us parts of India that had never graced the movies before, which is where I think people give it undue credit. Whereas the Dark Knight would have been much more deserving for the much better angles, lighting etc, but being a comicbook based movie, that is of course a no-no.
The problem with the underdog story is it's rediculous. An underdog story should be believable. Are the viewers really meant to believe that the questions were perfect and that a infant friendship somehow turns into love? Actually that one really baffled me, they hadn't seen each other for years, they really that retarded to think they love one another? I really wasn't compelled to watch it because of the feel-good theme running through it. Something nice and happy and utterly rediculous was going to happen to make the world a nice happy candy-cane land.
A feel good movie should be of the calibre of The Shawshank Redemption. Not a absurd storyline which simply gives the viewers the happy ending they wanted, not a real ending e.g. The Wrestler.
Plus in my opinion, The Wrestler was depressing enough to be a winner, not to mention it was "real", it felt like it captured the life of a man who no longer fit in the world. Slumdog I feel is just a lazy way of getting people to like a movie through making them feel good.
Slumdog showed India better than any movie I have seen...including Bollywood movies !

I think Dark Knight was a nice film but relied too much on Heath. When he was there, it was mesmerizing but when he left the screen, it was a run-of-the-mill comic book movie. Still a bit better than most comic book movies but doesn't elevate to a 'omg this is better than Shawshank' level.

And fairy tale story is meant to be ridiculous...cos cmon everything is perfect, If you don't get that then, well I don't think you understand fairy tale/underdog movie making.

I can easily say Wrestler is a lazy way of making people sad and hate life. It has been done before, maybe not as compelling as what Slumdog did to fairy tales :)
 

Xvito

New member
Aug 16, 2008
2,114
0
0
Where the hell is Indy?
I demand Indy!
Indiana Jones and the Kingdom of the Crystal Skull was like the greatest movie evar... Hur, hur, hur.
 

Maet

The Altoid Duke
Jul 31, 2008
1,247
0
0
Steelfists said:
Mazty said:
clicklick said:
-snip-
-snip-
The Oscars received flak last year for being too gritty and depressing, which is why they probably chose Slumdog Millionaire as Best Picture; they needed to remedy that criticism. What was it Stewart said when considering the Best Picture nominees? "All I can say is thank God for teen pregnancy..." in reference to Juno's nomination (a film I hated, for the record).

Also, I immensely enjoyed Slumdog's cinematography and direction, more so than the story or acting (which I'll agree was a tad too ridiculous and generally flat respectively).
 

PedroSteckecilo

Mexican Fugitive
Feb 7, 2008
6,732
0
0
Unfortunately most of the big name noms in this years oscars were too entertainment starved for me to take interest. The only Best Picture candidate I saw was Slumdog, before it was nominated, I enjoyed it quite a bit, despite the plot being based on coincidence.