Legion said:Yes, because they totally invented the phrase.
The Christian Bible: Mark 5:9 "My name is Legion, for we are many."
Hell, the list of times it has been used in pop-culture makes it even less original.
Yes, I am aware that I am stating that my own username and title is not original.
I think it's more their use of the capitalized Anonymous that got on Anonymous's nerves. I mean, the Tea Party basically cribbed their entire tagline, which is a bit cheeky.Legion said:Yes, because they totally invented the phrase.
The Christian Bible: Mark 5:9 "My name is Legion, for we are many."
Hell, the list of times it has been used in pop-culture makes it even less original.
Yes, I am aware that I am stating that my own username and title is not original.
/tg/'s not actually all that bad, to be honest. Most of the content on that board is fairly similar to the content on these forums (I'm not taking a jab at the Escapist there, it's a favourable conparison), with the occasional jackass. Which is pretty much the same as every other discussion forum on the web.Dyp100 said:Oh /b/, you crazy board.
I personally stick to /tg/ myself.
To try to give a relatively straight response: the Tea Party (and the various splinter groups such as the Oregon Tea Party) are groups of people who oppose policies of president Obama's administration which they believe will lead to higher taxes and deficits, in particular the administration's attempts to bring some kind of inclusive national health care system into being and the relief for various companies and financial institutions which nearly collapsed in the recent economic downturn.The Rockerfly said:Sorry what is the Oregon Tea Party? I have never heard of them
I don't think people are really getting this. The quote Anonymous claims is: "We are Anonymous. We are Legion. We do not forget. We do not forgive. Expect us."MelasZepheos said:Uh, so have Anonymous just claimed copyright for that passage of the Bible? Because I think that's ridiculous in so many ways I can't describe it. I hope they don't start attacking anyone who uses it, because it's a nice quote to steal for your work.
Just cheer that they are fighting. Hopefully at least one of them will shut up and go away when it's done.geldonyetich said:So, 4Chan versus Tea Party.
Which one am I supposed to support as the voice of reason here? It's like an escaped lunatic got into a fight with the guy who shouts religious-minded obscenities on street corners.
Yoshemo said:le snip
Callate said:le snip
Ah okay, so rednecks/KKK members in politics form that also borders on the popularity levels of the west borobaptist churchTenmar said:le snip
Others used that term and I am only using a quick analogy plus I didn't put words in your mouthTenmar said:Umm no...not even close. Did I mention KKK or rednecks? Don't put words in my mouth Rockerfly because it doesn't help the discourse at all.
It's like this, Chuck... There are three types of people in this world.Matt_LRR said:Celtic_Kerr said:Hm... I suppose... My stupid.
But I've actually never heard of anonymous before today. I just done' undertand any of it... Especially the epilepsy thing I posted above
Anonymous are internet trolls.
A large group of anonymous internet trolls. That's it. They aren't organised, or led, they're just a bunch of people that like to troll other internet users for fun.
The only cause they are in any way organized around is protesting the church of scientology, and even that is decried by other Anons. for being too organized and high-profile, and not generating enough "lulz".
As far as I'm concerned, they're a necessary evil of the internet - sure, they may get destructive and antagonistic when they have nothing better to do, but they also enact a lot of vigilante justice online as well.
What it boils down to is just that they're trolls, and they'll troll whatever seems like a troll-worthy target on any given day.
If that means trolling someone who's being evil and a giant dick, they'll do that. If it means trolling a kid who posts stupid videos on youtube, they'll do that too.
The trick is to just not draw their attention. (like, by using their motto, for instance)
---
Regarding the article you posted, it's always fun to see people repot on something like this with absolutely no idea with regards to online dynamics and crowdsourcing.
Some anonymous folk associated with 4chan may have been responsible for the attacks on those epilepsy sites (trolling, remember), but those actions aren't tied to "anonymous" as a group, because there is no central group. There are just people who are anonymous, who band together around actions and then disperse back into the crowd.
of course no charges were laid against anonymous, there is no anonymous. there are just individuals who are anonymous. "anonymous" is just a name.
Hopefully, that cleared things up, a bit.
-m
The only disturbing thing here is you trying to insult the Oregon Tea Party for choosing not to goad, the potentially bankrupting, "anon" criminals into an online war.Andy Chalk said:Anonymous Punishes the Oregon Tea Party
, but does anyone else find it disturbing that the Tea Party [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tea_Party_movement], which bills itself as a legitimate voice of conservative political dissent in the United States, "admires" the tactics of Anonymous?
via: Twitter [http://twitter.com/AllenVarney/status/19746436671]
Permalink