quiet_samurai said:Let the Right one in
Shawshank Redemption
One flew over the Cookoos nest
Casablanca
Clerks
The Good, the Bad, & the Ugly.
Unforgiven (actually tons of good westerns, but im not goona list them all)
Evil Jak said:quiet_samurai said:Let the Right one in
Shawshank Redemption
One flew over the Cookoos nest
Casablanca
Clerks
The Good, the Bad, & the Ugly.
Unforgiven (actually tons of good westerns, but im not goona list them all)
Clerks, yes!
Oh and Heartbreak Ridge.
Clint Eastwood = Coolest man ever!
quiet_samurai said:Evil Jak said:quiet_samurai said:Let the Right one in
Shawshank Redemption
One flew over the Cookoos nest
Casablanca
Clerks
The Good, the Bad, & the Ugly.
Unforgiven (actually tons of good westerns, but im not goona list them all)
Clerks, yes!
Oh and Heartbreak Ridge.
Clint Eastwood = Coolest man ever!
Yeah pretty much all his movies fit in this category. I can't think of a single movie of his that has loads or any special effects beside maybe make-up or something.
I think the term CGI and 'special effects' just wasn't defined clearly enough in this thread... that, and just general lack of knowledge when it comes to how certain movies were made, and with what.PurpleRain said:You really wouldn't believe how many movies have CGI. Which is why I'm suprised half the movies here are posted. Little things like fitting a camera through a gap too small to make a really cool tracking shot can all be fixed with CGI. It's great, amazing. You have to stop thinking movies like Transformers or most Hollywood really. Those movies are made by people who go after the $$$. So the story was never compromised for CGI as there was no story to begin with.crypt-creature said:It would be great for a movie to have both, it's just that I see so many movies where they have compromised a good story for better CGI.PurpleRain said:Why compromise? Why not have both? CGI can be a way to tell a story. What if the story was to be set on the back of a snake flying through space, Special Effect are most definitly needed.
Having both would be lovely, but I'm not going to count on it happening for a lot of movies.
Though I was pretty impressed with the new Star Trek movie, and I'm not a huge fan of the franchise either.
You have to remember, the scripts were made first. The story was either good or bad to begin with.
And unlike a lot of the films mentioned here, it actually has no special effects. Any action movie will have special effects, especially if any guns are used. They might not be digital but they are categorized as fx.whitemidget said:Clerks. Had a microbudget, and the only special effect was having Scott Mosier yell at himself during the hockey scene. The movie's always had a soft spot in my heart, as I was 13 or something when I first saw it. It's been one of the big developing movies of my adolescence.