Best movie with little or no special effects.

Recommended Videos

Kinguendo

New member
Apr 10, 2009
4,267
0
0
quiet_samurai said:
Let the Right one in
Shawshank Redemption
One flew over the Cookoos nest
Casablanca
Clerks
The Good, the Bad, & the Ugly.
Unforgiven (actually tons of good westerns, but im not goona list them all)

Clerks, yes!

Oh and Heartbreak Ridge.
Clint Eastwood = Coolest man ever!
 

CuddlyCombine

New member
Sep 12, 2007
1,142
0
0
Children of Men, definitely. At least, it doesn't feature conventional special effects. The majority of alterations are made to create the illusion of one really long camera take; this is done a few times through the movie (to amazing effect, if I may add). That's really the only movie I can think of right now.

Oh, and Transformers. For sure.
 

quiet_samurai

New member
Apr 24, 2009
3,897
0
0
Evil Jak said:
quiet_samurai said:
Let the Right one in
Shawshank Redemption
One flew over the Cookoos nest
Casablanca
Clerks
The Good, the Bad, & the Ugly.
Unforgiven (actually tons of good westerns, but im not goona list them all)

Clerks, yes!

Oh and Heartbreak Ridge.
Clint Eastwood = Coolest man ever!

Yeah pretty much all his movies fit in this category. I can't think of a single movie of his that has loads or any special effects beside maybe make-up or something.
 

Kinguendo

New member
Apr 10, 2009
4,267
0
0
quiet_samurai said:
Evil Jak said:
quiet_samurai said:
Let the Right one in
Shawshank Redemption
One flew over the Cookoos nest
Casablanca
Clerks
The Good, the Bad, & the Ugly.
Unforgiven (actually tons of good westerns, but im not goona list them all)

Clerks, yes!

Oh and Heartbreak Ridge.
Clint Eastwood = Coolest man ever!

Yeah pretty much all his movies fit in this category. I can't think of a single movie of his that has loads or any special effects beside maybe make-up or something.

Hahaha, could you imagine celebrities without make-up... AAARGGGH! Dont do it, dont... they are the beautiful people, they are most definately not the Aliens from Alien... Oh god, the slime.
 

crypt-creature

New member
May 12, 2009
585
0
0
PurpleRain said:
crypt-creature said:
PurpleRain said:
Why compromise? Why not have both? CGI can be a way to tell a story. What if the story was to be set on the back of a snake flying through space, Special Effect are most definitly needed.
It would be great for a movie to have both, it's just that I see so many movies where they have compromised a good story for better CGI.
Having both would be lovely, but I'm not going to count on it happening for a lot of movies.

Though I was pretty impressed with the new Star Trek movie, and I'm not a huge fan of the franchise either.
You really wouldn't believe how many movies have CGI. Which is why I'm suprised half the movies here are posted. Little things like fitting a camera through a gap too small to make a really cool tracking shot can all be fixed with CGI. It's great, amazing. You have to stop thinking movies like Transformers or most Hollywood really. Those movies are made by people who go after the $$$. So the story was never compromised for CGI as there was no story to begin with.
You have to remember, the scripts were made first. The story was either good or bad to begin with.
I think the term CGI and 'special effects' just wasn't defined clearly enough in this thread... that, and just general lack of knowledge when it comes to how certain movies were made, and with what.

But again, I'm still talking about movies that have been compromised by CGI, or special effects.
Or to word myself better, movies that I felt had a good story, but was over looked because they used too much CGI and special effects to try and tell their story. Basically getting too carried away.
 

oldMcDouche

New member
Mar 30, 2009
140
0
0
i think jarhead had no special effects, except for some explosions.
at the end of the film you realize the protagonist didnt even fire one shot.
 

likalaruku

New member
Nov 29, 2008
4,290
0
0
Gee, video games are doing the same. Almost all of the movies I like are from the 80s, & early 90s. But I'm gunna go with Nightmare on Elm Street series for horror, Police Academy series for comedy, Fantasia for animation, & clasic subtitled/dubbed Jackie Chan films for action.

I actualy have an aversion to CG special effects outside of horror & fantasy movies. It even took me up to 2007 to completely get rid of my hatred for 3D animation in cartoons & video games.

Yes, as the cool effects go up, the plot becomes dumber & the actors have to use retarded scripts from cheaper underdeveloped writers. It's as annoying as Disney using hollywood actors to do voices instead of getting professional voice actors.

I dunno why they bother with the CG; everything looks unrealistic & hoakey because things move at unrealistic speeds. I still remember how awful Spawn & Van Hellsing looked, the latter being simple terrible through & through.
 

Xaryn Mar

New member
Sep 17, 2008
697
0
0
As far as I know all films use special effects. Does it feature rain? then that is very likely a special effect, lighting can also be referred to as special effects although simple ones.
Simply put: Anything that the director cannot count on happening the exact way he wants it to (as in rain) will be made using special effects (in this case a rain boom).
 

matsugawa

New member
Mar 18, 2009
673
0
0
Good movies with no CG effects is a long list, but for no special effects of any variety, that's a bit tricky.

The one that comes to mind is Chasing Amy. There might be a stunt or two, but everything you see is just what the camera saw.
 
Nov 28, 2007
10,686
0
0
Hate to follow the masses, but when your opinion of the best movie ever doesn't have special effects, it's a given to be the best movie with little to now special effects. That movie, my friends, is The Shawshank Redemption. By the way, the novella it's based on is pretty good, too.
 

Acier

New member
Nov 5, 2009
1,300
0
0
True Stories.

Basically no special effect at all.

And also like 87% of the movies listed here *do* have special effects. CGI and special effects aren't synonymous.
 

GonzoGamer

New member
Apr 9, 2008
7,063
0
0
whitemidget said:
Clerks. Had a microbudget, and the only special effect was having Scott Mosier yell at himself during the hockey scene. The movie's always had a soft spot in my heart, as I was 13 or something when I first saw it. It's been one of the big developing movies of my adolescence.
And unlike a lot of the films mentioned here, it actually has no special effects. Any action movie will have special effects, especially if any guns are used. They might not be digital but they are categorized as fx.

I would have to suggest Pump up the Volume: probably one of the best teen movies of all time. Night on Earth too.
 

Valksy

New member
Nov 5, 2009
1,279
0
0
The Green Mile sprang to mind. A film that broke my heart the day I saw it - it was a late night preview and the lobby of the cinema was full of red-eyed and/or openly weeping people.

That said I guess there were a few practical effects and some CGI mice.

Really hard to be honest.

My personal bugbear these days is the overuse of CGI. Take the Matrix 2. You have the "burly brawl" where one Neo fights many Agents. And then you have the freeway chase. Both are CGI but one is so shitty I could scream and the other uses it with subtlety by adding in more cars for a greater sense of peril.

Guess organic CGI does not work for me. I was pretty disappointed with Spiderman for example.
 

Serge A. Storms

New member
Oct 7, 2009
641
0
0
Trick question! Everyone knows that there's not such thing as a good movie that doesn't involve explosions and Matrix Reloaded-style car chases!