Bioware + Bethesda: Best Game Ever?

Recommended Videos

Justice4L

New member
Aug 24, 2011
213
0
0
Monicro said:
Justice4L said:
ChupathingyX said:
No, because I never want Bethesda to work on a Fallout game ever again.
WHAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAT? Fallout 3 was better than New Vegas!
This was from all the way back on page 1, but I have to ask, what makes you think this? I'm not even trying to insult you, I'm just honestly curious.

As for the actual topic, eh, it's a toss-up. There would have to be a ton of things that both companies would have to work on to make it work, really. Bioware's terrible writing of the romance paths (or better yet just don't include them altogether), Beth's mediocre world building (yup, a woman in Arefu who thinks she's a 50's housewife sure does make sense even though she had grown up her whole life in the wasteland and would really have no way of knowing what a housewife is or would act like)/ lack of tangible choice (gee, I'm a town nuking, slave selling, mass murdering dickhead but it's time to buckle down and help dad with this pure water for everyone thing, this is a really great idea). My point is even if the best possible product came out of this metaphorical team up it would still have a shit ton of problems.
Well to start I really adore New Vegas, I think Obsidian deserves more attention for the amount of effort they made. I was just not as captured into New Vegas. I think it is because New Vegas was a bit happier and easier to get into. In F3, I actually felt screwed, like I was in the Capital Wasteland. Everything was out to get you. In NV, you have more allies and the pacing allows you to build up to the harder foes when you are a bit more ready. There was none of that in F3, which really made everything much more tense and satisfying. The world felt like a wasteland, like a nuke had been dropped. I know this was deliberate, but in NV, it's just a desert. I never felt quite as absorbed into the world as I was in F3. I think F3 is more of a fight to survive game where you could die any minute by making a mistake. NV is more relaxed, so it didn't have the same effect on me. Also, NV's map is not as good as it could have been. A whole third is not really being used at all. And the actual New Vegas is very tiny. I guess walking through a desolate DC had more of a effect on me and felt more epic and intense. Love both though.

Wow, that was a rant, I apologise :)
 

70R4N

New member
Jan 14, 2010
120
0
0
Riobux said:
SpaceBat said:
Riobux said:
It's Dragon Age: Origins. Which managed to create an universe that is unique and dark, and avoided the obvious trap of making it too flowery.
Hmm, I suppose DA:O's writing is above average for Bioware and way better than the story's such as of the overrated I-mostly-rely-on-a-twist KotoR et cetera, but I wouldn't call it Legendary, only pretty good. But that's just my opinion.
Comparing Dragon Age: Origins to the typical game, it's legendary.
Dragon Age had such a predictable story. I kinda enjoyed it, but it wasn't in any way unique or even good. It was a mediocre dark fantasy with so many cliches i lost count.
 

taciturnCandid

New member
Dec 1, 2010
363
0
0
One company with shitty gameplay and great story lines and one company with fairly good story lines and shitty gameplay? well.. I'd prefer that to not happen.

However, one of those companies combined with Atlus! HECK YES
 

Baron von Blitztank

New member
May 7, 2010
2,133
0
0
I say get Valve + BioWare + Bethesda + People Can Fly + Croteam + ID Software + Naughty Dog + Sucker Punch + Avalanche Studios + Gearbox + Rockstar + Square Enix (in the Chrono Trigger era) all together and then we MAY have the best game ever made.
With just BioWare and Bethesda? We'll probably just get a really good RPG
 

Sicram

New member
Mar 17, 2010
135
0
0
Awesome game idea... too bad it'll never happen. Hell, even if the studios at some point DID go together to make a game like this it'd take them more time than all the half-lifes dev time put together. If it's supposed to be up to par with AAA quality regarding graphics and spoken dialouge.

But hey, I'd get it.
 

Lt. Vinciti

New member
Nov 5, 2009
1,285
0
0
ChupathingyX said:
No, because I never want Bethesda to work on a Fallout game ever again.

Publising and financing is fine, but not developing.
You should have bought out Interplay or the Fallout rights...


to bad....They had the cash they paid for it...they own it...


On Topic:

No. Sorry....I enjoy how Bethesda makes their games...


Bioware used to do a good job...now they are merely a gear in EA's money printing press
 

42

Australian Justice
Jan 30, 2010
697
0
0
ChupathingyX said:
No, because I never want Bethesda to work on a Fallout game ever again.

Publising and financing is fine, but not developing.
They did that, and they released New Vegas which was buggy as shit. Blame Obsidian, Not Bethesda.
 

MetallicaRulez0

New member
Aug 27, 2008
2,503
0
0
Bethesda would just turn BioWare's great game into a gigantic boring empty landscape that takes 45 minutes to traverse anywhere.

I understand some people like exploration, but my god Bethesda makes some boring empty game worlds.
 

Midnight Crossroads

New member
Jul 17, 2010
1,912
0
0
I'm not much a fan of Bioware or Fallout.

I'd rather see Bethesda team up with Tale Worlds, be given the rights to the Fantasy Warhammer universe, and make an open-world RPG/strategy game. That was what they should have done in the first place instead of making Warhammer Online. I'd totally roll a human, become a warrior of Chaos, and lead an army against the Empire.
 

FilipJPhry

New member
Jul 5, 2011
954
0
0
We obviously have trolls who hate both of them here, but it would be a very interesting game.


Let Bioware work on the writing, character design, face-mapping and lore. I'm still amazed how Grunt looks in ME2. The lore is already made from previous games, but it won't hurt to add and improve. Make sure that the NPCs have plenty of dialogue, and if need be, romance options. The writing will improve if they are allowed freedom. Take it to another timeline. Make sure it's hilarious.

Bethesda will work on the "world". Level design is their money maker. Design awesome looking creatures. Make huge cities and buildings. Have them work on level-up progression as well. By the end of most of their games, you're basically a walking A-bomb. Makes you feel like a badass. It would make a great post-game if you finished every quest.

This last bit will be their test: multi-player. Level scaling will be the downside to this feature. Have equipment/items be unique to your games. Be able to trade inventory, have a tag-team in arenas if possible, make multi-player specific objectives, and add a "bonus" surprise. I don't know what, but I'm sure Bethesda and Bioware can come up with one. They should definitely take a lesson from Borderlands in terms of open world multi-player.

Well, that's my two cents for the ultimate "Beth-oware" game. The universe or God might one day decide if the two developers should unite, and if they would, they will shock and awe.
 

TilMorrow

Diabolical Party Member
Jul 7, 2010
3,246
0
0
Wouldn't happen. As EA would be all up in there if they even tried. Also I don't think blank faced people plus blank faced people is a good combination. Because you'll end up with the faceless ones. They would need Rockstar to lend the team behind L.A. Noire for emotion.

Oh wait just realised I've been ninja'd.
 

ChupathingyX

New member
Jun 8, 2010
3,716
0
0
42 said:
ChupathingyX said:
No, because I never want Bethesda to work on a Fallout game ever again.

Publising and financing is fine, but not developing.
They did that, and they released New Vegas which was buggy as shit. Blame Obsidian, Not Bethesda.
Yes, New Vegas was buggy, but you can't put all blame on Obsidian.

They were using Bethesda's engine, an engine that is buggy and out-dated.

Plus Obsidian were given a very small period to actually work on the game, almost less than half of Fallout 3's development time.

Plus Betehsda did the QA testing, not Obsidian.

New Vegas also had a smaller budget than Fallout 3.

However, although New Vegas was buggy, it didn't have Fallout 3'a inconsistency, lack of knowledge of the Fallout world, bland characters, bad writing, dull RPG elements and it even improved on the gameplay in more ways than most people refuse to believe.
 

veloper

New member
Jan 20, 2009
4,597
0
0
TS isn't seeing what is right in front of him.

Bethesda/Obsidian.
Obsidian write better dialogues and invent better plots than Bioware.

All they need is better animators and more voice actors and those are easy enough to hire. They can save money by skipping on expensive celebrities to do half-hearted VOs.

Bug squashing is a matter of time and effort. They could prolly do it if they went for quality.
Don't Bethesda have ID in their pocket anyway? Bethesda/Obs/ID.
ID can do the coding and the shooter gameplay.
 

Delsana

New member
Aug 16, 2011
866
0
0
Well Bethesda has bugs and Bioware has betray the fans so... bugs and fans betrayed = worst game ever.

Throw Blizzard in and it will take forever and be boring as well.
 

Machocruz

New member
Aug 6, 2010
88
0
0
Larian + Pirahna Bytes + Obsidian + Richard Garriot for new Ultima game, and quality, depth and intelligence return to the RPG world.