That's sort of an Egyptian art thing, though. You can tell the women in Egyptian art because of how light their skin is compared to the other figures. It's just the way they do things. Egyptian art is very...expressive rather than literal. For example, they also do hierarchical figure sizing. That means the most important figure (such as a god, pharaoh, or a local ruler) is the largest on display. That way anybody looking at it can immediately tell who's in charge.No_Remainders said:See Amun, Horus, Isis and Osiris.
Are you really trying to compare the christian god to a norse god that is really particular to the region ?John the Gamer said:black gods work just fine; Morgan Freeman in the Almighty movies.
![]()
He was awesome as god. Really brought the 'character' to life.
Fuck you racists.
wikipedia said:Heimdall is described as the son of nine different mothers (possibly the nine daughters of Ægir, called billow maidens) and was called the White God.
Try to read my entire post before commenting on it, please.No_Remainders said:...Jonluw said:I am actually extremely annoyed that these people decide to cast a man who doesn't look a bit like the part to play Heimdal. I find it fucking ridiculous that they need to alter my cultural heritage in order to have the cast better represent the ethnic diversity in modern day North-America.
Your "cultural heritage"?
I'm sorry, what?
Not trying to sound offensive, but really? It's a Hollywood movie based on a comic book based VERY LOOSELY on Norse Mythology.
So, no, that's just stupid of you.
It kind of does, actually. The black guy is playing Heimdall, who was often known as the 'White god'. It has a certain irony to it.joystickjunki3 said:If you didn't read it, it's about a black man portraying one of the Norse gods (doesn't matter which one)
This is Marvel in my opinion, all its cast has ben traditionally varied in matter of race, so I wouldn't be so picky in their racial origin. It's not the same playing a comic character based in a deity than one which is heavily based in a real person (Gandhi) or in a film that specifically revolves around this person's race/background (Kunta Kinte) and who you couldn't be played by someone else lest the film wouldn't make any sense. Will this film be worse depending in which color is the person who plays an abstract deity/superhero based off some mithology? I don't think so.Fishir said:Lets remake Roots with Kunta Kinte played by a white man and see what happens. Guarantee you it wont go down well. All sorts of people will be up in arms.
Wow that sounds really racist. It really shouldn't matter. Hell I was all for black Peter Parker. God knows it's better than the guy they picked to play him.KSarty said:Beyond that, why do they WANT a black actor playing the character? Will the movie be better because of it?
I like your pic. RAMM -- STEIN!!008Zulu said:They're Gods, they can choose to appear as they wish.
I agree entirely with this. You sir, are a smart cookie.will1182 said:I think people should cast whoever feels most natural for the part. If they did a biography on say, Abraham Lincoln, it would be completely unnatural for a black man to play him. Similar to a white man playing, I dunno, Ghandi.
In other words, the casting director should pick who is most suitable for the part, and not go by "Hm, I better make my cast more multicultural lest someone yell at me."