It's outrage-ception.teebeeohh said:btw did you just emulate a "there will be pc-elitist outrage" post, which itself emulates your generic "pc-elitist outrage"?
It's outrage-ception.teebeeohh said:btw did you just emulate a "there will be pc-elitist outrage" post, which itself emulates your generic "pc-elitist outrage"?
We really think the console version won't also require always online? Ha. That's rich.SupahGamuh said:My eyes... they burn!.Greg Tito said:FarCray 3
OT: Meh, good for them I guess. Blizzard are no strangers to consoles, the first Diablo was already available for the original PlayStation, with 2 player coop and all and Starcraft was available for the N64.
They get the money from people who poopoo PC games and PC gamers who want to play the game offline whithout Blizzard constantly checking if you're not cheating or scamming somebody for that precious armor they want.
The perfect Win=Win situation.
their part of activison, so ... >.> didn't they do that already?666Satsuki said:All I can really say to that is hell yea. Its about dam time blizzard finaly gave in to the dark side.
Perhaps allow M+K? All that area of effect crap does is turn it into God of War RPG edition, not to mention easier.Hammeroj said:What do you propose then, auto-target?Waaghpowa said:Not that Diablo 3 for consoles is a bad thing, just hope that they don't do to it like they did to Torchlight. By that I mean make all your attacks CONE AREA OF EFFECT.
This is easily the biggest problem of this sort of a game making it onto the controller. The aiming is literally one-dimensional.
M+K cost less than controllers and the average person already has one laying around, it shouldn't be an issue. Also, how many people wanting it for console haven't played the original? I have a feeling that this isn't going to be something that a whole lot of console players will know about unless they frequent sites like these anyway.Hammeroj said:That would be better for sure, but, realistically, how many console owners have a M+K setup? 5% as a really optimistic estimate? And then, how many of those people would actually prefer the more skill-intensive version of the game?
I said the average person probably has one laying around and they're significantly cheaper than any of the proprietary controllers.Hammeroj said:You aren't going to plug those out of your browsing(or work) computer every time you want to play some Diablo, though, would you?
You can, just that no games have support for it except UT Black. I've used a keyboard plenty of times to type on a ps3.Also, I was under the impression that you can't plug just any mouse or keyboard into a PS3/Xbox360.
House hold name to people like us maybe, but the "Non gamer" doesn't associate games to developers most of the time. Most of the people I played WoW with didn't even know that Diablo was a Blizzard game until they forced a battle.net merge. I work at a game retail store as well. Whenever someone asks me what Borderlands is like, the first thing I ask is "Have you played Diablo?". I have yet to get a yes answer.Diablo is pretty much a household name when it comes to gaming, given that one doesn't live in a bubble. Even if it weren't, it still would. Because Blizzard is as well, and they've made World of Warcraft. Name recognition alone will bring a shitload of sales. On that note, how much has the console version of Torchlight sold so far? Anybody knows?
I stumbled on this on IGN, apparently Blizz clarified by saying that the console version of Diablo 3 was still being explored.Greg Tito said:Blizzard Double-Secret Confirms Diablo III on Consoles
Actually, it's not. Diablo I was on the PS One.Aeshi said:I know someone's already mentioned this but this would be the first time Diablo has graced consoles. I'm kind of curious to see whether they can pull it off.