Meh, whatever one grows up with, I guess.Glefistus said:I also kind of know Plattdüütsch, which is still easier to understand than the southern accent of Bavaria, I don't know how you stand it.
Meh, whatever one grows up with, I guess.Glefistus said:I also kind of know Plattdüütsch, which is still easier to understand than the southern accent of Bavaria, I don't know how you stand it.
Now that I think about it, why haven't scandinavian internet users started to refer themselves as Vikings or E-Vikings or something like that?Glefistus said:Plus there isn't really a great way to prove bloodline, as most of Europe is probably nearly genetically identical. It's more of a novelty to know your ancestry than anything. Or something to brag about, if you're A VIKING LIKE ME!
Poles are Slavic, not Germanic.Glefistus said:Yeah, but what about German in the broader sense? If you were to say every Germanic is German than you would have Dutch, Poles, Austrians, Germans and some Czechs being called German.Skeleon said:Why?Sparrow said:Because you're label makes more sense.
Germany consists of 16 states under a federal government.
I'm not a Saxon, Hamburger, Palatine and so on...
Following your logic, I'd have to have ancestors from all parts of Germany to be called a German.
As for actual Germany, I'd say anything goes except for SchleswigHolstein. I wouldn't consider Schleswig-Holstein a part of Germany, most people with ancestry there are probably of Scandinavian descent, as it was part of Denmark for the longest time. Personally, I just like thinking of myself as a Viking.
What blood lines exactly? If viking is one of them, what about the others?Glefistus said:Good, because there are only five or so actual "bloodlines" in Europe(as in, the different groups of people who migrated into Europe originally). But still, I accept all the bloodline crap when I want to be a Viking, because they are pretty cool.
Doug said:By the same token, you could say we're all African, because if you go back far enough, everyone is descented from the first humans there.George Palmer said:ehhh if you go back far enough we are all British. Except those who aren't or never were..
...wait...what?
I'd like them to dissolve the union then I could have an English passport.Sparrow said:So, a high percentage of people, mainly Americans (I'm not pointing fingers, it's just the higher percentage of people!) seem to think that "British" means "English". That may very well be true, but it doesn't just stop there. Being "British" means your part of Britain, or the UK. However, it can't be used in the sense that it's your nationality. It's a lable, yes. However, if I were to have "British" as my nationality, that would mean I'm Welsh, Scottish, English and partly Irish.
I'm just throwing this out there but, everyone gets that right? I hate to be a little elitist, but this is the Escapist, and it's built up of a mutli-diverse, but mainly intelligent group of people so I'm assuming the answer is yes.
But, just to be sure, and probally a bit patronizing, you all get that right?
Geographically (and politically) the United Kingdom and Great Britain are two different (albeit similar) things.Maraveno said:what??? you do know great britain and U.K are one and the same thing right?Standby said:Northern Ireland is park of the UK, not BritainSparrow said:So, a high percentage of people, mainly Americans (I'm not pointing fingers, it's just the higher percentage of people!) seem to think that "British" means "English". That may very well be true, but it doesn't just stop there. Being "British" means your part of Britain, or the UK. However, it can't be used in the sense that it's your nationality. It's a lable, yes. However, if I were to have "British" as my nationality, that would mean I'm Welsh, Scottish, English and partly Irish.
I'm just throwing this out there but, everyone gets that right? I hate to be a little elitist, but this is the Escapist, and it's built up of a mutli-diverse, but mainly intelligent group of people so I'm assuming the answer is yes.
But, just to be sure, and probally a bit patronizing, you all get that right?
Or are you Ukish?
Holy crap, you just admitted you're a martian! I want blood samples!canadamus_prime said:Screw you! I'm no more British then I am a Martian.Clyde said:If the Queen of England is your head of state, you are British.
That includes Canada, until they get around to having a revolution.
Great Britain is sometimes casually used as synonymous with the UK, but this is an inaccurate usage, and Great Britain should just refer to England, Scotland and Wales. This can be easily verified by checking up any number of net sources (e.g. Wikipedia).Maraveno said:there is no difference what you are referring to is called the british isles if you wish to include Ireland as a whole that's what you call itStandby said:Geographically (and politically) the United Kingdom and Great Britain are two different (albeit similar) things.Maraveno said:what??? you do know great britain and U.K are one and the same thing right?Standby said:Northern Ireland is park of the UK, not BritainSparrow said:So, a high percentage of people, mainly Americans (I'm not pointing fingers, it's just the higher percentage of people!) seem to think that "British" means "English". That may very well be true, but it doesn't just stop there. Being "British" means your part of Britain, or the UK. However, it can't be used in the sense that it's your nationality. It's a lable, yes. However, if I were to have "British" as my nationality, that would mean I'm Welsh, Scottish, English and partly Irish.
I'm just throwing this out there but, everyone gets that right? I hate to be a little elitist, but this is the Escapist, and it's built up of a mutli-diverse, but mainly intelligent group of people so I'm assuming the answer is yes.
But, just to be sure, and probally a bit patronizing, you all get that right?
Or are you Ukish?
Please provide a source if you're saying they're the same.
Great Britain is simply A different word for United kingdom
Nope, otherwise the full version of what is shortened to the UK wouldn't be The United Kingdoms of Great Britain and Northern Ireland. If GB included NI that would be an including or the last bit just wouldn't be there.Maraveno said:Great Britain is simply A different word for United kingdom