Call of Duty 7 is probably going to have subsciptions

Recommended Videos

SilkySkyKitten

New member
Oct 20, 2009
1,021
0
0
presidentjlh said:
socialtangent said:
If the next CoD game has subscriptions, I will never buy it. Activision is really pushing the envelope with their business tactics.
Honestly, they are pushing to become more of a disliked corporation than EA.
Indeed. I'd even go so far as saying Activision is the new EA, especially since EA hasn't been making nearly as many dick moves as they used to be a few years ago (and are actually pumping out some good stuff these days, as well).
 

MONSTERheart

New member
Aug 17, 2009
457
0
0
hey, check it out! Another company is whoring itself out for money at the price of a quality product! Come on, just stop making Call of Duty games. The last good one was World at War. It was actually something different. Now its just the same game with prettier explosions and a couple new pea shooters. Kill it. Oh god, please kill this monstrosity. Very few video game developers and publishers are remaining true to the sprit in which they began: People trying to deliver a piece of QUALITY entertainment that they pour their love and hard work into in the hopes of giving the consumer the experience they want them to. I think I can count the number of these true and dedicated developers on one hand.
 

presidentjlh

New member
Feb 10, 2010
320
0
0
MONSTERheart said:
hey, check it out! Another company is whoring itself out for money at the price of a quality product! Come on, just stop making Call of Duty games. The last good one was World at War. It was actually something different. Now its just the same game with prettier explosions and a couple new pea shooters. Kill it. Oh god, please kill this monstrosity. Very few video game developers and publishers are remaining true to the sprit in which they began: People trying to deliver a piece of QUALITY entertainment that they pour their love and hard work into in the hopes of giving the consumer the experience they want them to. I think I can count the number of these true and dedicated developers on one hand.
All (well, most) video game companies start off wanting to create a fine, high quality game that is original, entertaining, a fair challenge, and just plain fun. Many of them do such.

But then the money starts rolling in, and they think, "Well, I can make more money at the expense of this," and it starts going downhill.
 

MetallicaRulez0

New member
Aug 27, 2008
2,503
0
0
If they go through with this, they will lose massive amounts of sales. I for one would rather keep playing CoD4 than pay a subscription for a shooter.

Will they make up for only selling around half as many copies with subscription fees? Only time will tell. My gut says 'Hell no'.
 

Americow

New member
Aug 26, 2009
349
0
0
I reverted to the original MW after trying to play MW2, much better game. And if they go through with this, I'll just wave the middle finger this company's way.
 

m_jim

New member
Jan 14, 2008
497
0
0
presidentjlh said:
MONSTERheart said:
hey, check it out! Another company is whoring itself out for money at the price of a quality product! Come on, just stop making Call of Duty games. The last good one was World at War. It was actually something different. Now its just the same game with prettier explosions and a couple new pea shooters. Kill it. Oh god, please kill this monstrosity. Very few video game developers and publishers are remaining true to the sprit in which they began: People trying to deliver a piece of QUALITY entertainment that they pour their love and hard work into in the hopes of giving the consumer the experience they want them to. I think I can count the number of these true and dedicated developers on one hand.
All (well, most) video game companies start off wanting to create a fine, high quality game that is original, entertaining, a fair challenge, and just plain fun. Many of them do such.

But then the money starts rolling in, and they think, "Well, I can make more money at the expense of this," and it starts going downhill.
I like that the assumption here is that Infinity Ward didn't make exactly the game that they wanted to make. If you were to talk to the programmers who slaved away making a final product that looked and played the way that MW2 does, they would probably take offense to the notion that love and hard work didn't have a part of it.

I still wouldn't subscribe to play it, though.
 

presidentjlh

New member
Feb 10, 2010
320
0
0
m_jim said:
presidentjlh said:
MONSTERheart said:
hey, check it out! Another company is whoring itself out for money at the price of a quality product! Come on, just stop making Call of Duty games. The last good one was World at War. It was actually something different. Now its just the same game with prettier explosions and a couple new pea shooters. Kill it. Oh god, please kill this monstrosity. Very few video game developers and publishers are remaining true to the sprit in which they began: People trying to deliver a piece of QUALITY entertainment that they pour their love and hard work into in the hopes of giving the consumer the experience they want them to. I think I can count the number of these true and dedicated developers on one hand.
All (well, most) video game companies start off wanting to create a fine, high quality game that is original, entertaining, a fair challenge, and just plain fun. Many of them do such.

But then the money starts rolling in, and they think, "Well, I can make more money at the expense of this," and it starts going downhill.
I like that the assumption here is that Infinity Ward didn't make exactly the game that they wanted to make. If you were to talk to the programmers who slaved away making a final product that looked and played the way that MW2 does, they would probably take offense to the notion that love and hard work didn't have a part of it.

I still wouldn't subscribe to play it, though.
Oh I know that the programmers want to make incredibly enjoyable games for the public, and they gotta feel pissed when the bigwigs cut down on all their stuff for the sake of the bottom line.
 

SUPA FRANKY

New member
Aug 18, 2009
1,889
0
0
The bad thing about it is that its still gonna sell a hell of alot of copies, no matter what bullshit they do! Honestly, this is some of the things that piss me of about the huge gaming companies. So many wonderful games that died at retail...yet fucking rip offs like this still sell millions.
 

m_jim

New member
Jan 14, 2008
497
0
0
presidentjlh said:
m_jim said:
I like that the assumption here is that Infinity Ward didn't make exactly the game that they wanted to make. If you were to talk to the programmers who slaved away making a final product that looked and played the way that MW2 does, they would probably take offense to the notion that love and hard work didn't have a part of it.

I still wouldn't subscribe to play it, though.
Oh I know that the programmers want to make incredibly enjoyable games for the public, and they gotta feel pissed when the bigwigs cut down on all their stuff for the sake of the bottom line.
Hm. I wasn't aware that anything was cut out for the sake of profit. I heard the rumors about the "Terrorist Zombies" mode, but IW itself squashed that. I feel that the last game has been fair, in that they aren't charging you for DLC that is just an unlock key for content already on the disc. I'm with you 100%, though, in that the greed at the upper levels of the company (Activision) is going to screw over the folks who just want to tell a story and craft an experience.
 

Pingieking

New member
Sep 19, 2009
1,362
0
0
m_jim said:
presidentjlh said:
m_jim said:
I like that the assumption here is that Infinity Ward didn't make exactly the game that they wanted to make. If you were to talk to the programmers who slaved away making a final product that looked and played the way that MW2 does, they would probably take offense to the notion that love and hard work didn't have a part of it.

I still wouldn't subscribe to play it, though.
Oh I know that the programmers want to make incredibly enjoyable games for the public, and they gotta feel pissed when the bigwigs cut down on all their stuff for the sake of the bottom line.
Hm. I wasn't aware that anything was cut out for the sake of profit. I heard the rumors about the "Terrorist Zombies" mode, but IW itself squashed that. I feel that the last game has been fair, in that they aren't charging you for DLC that is just an unlock key for content already on the disc. I'm with you 100%, though, in that the greed at the upper levels of the company (Activision) is going to screw over the folks who just want to tell a story and craft an experience.
The fact that nothing was cut out of MW2 for the sake of profit (and all evidence points to this being the case, good example is IWNet) is what worries me. Because this means that IW is not as good as I thought they were.
 

acklumos

New member
May 1, 2009
342
0
0
Well, I wasn't going to get it anyway, as I truly hated Modern Warfare 2 (for my own reasons, not because it's "cool" to hate) but now I don't have to worry about my friends pestering me to get it. Don't get me wrong, I'm not saying I like this at all, this is bullshit. All we can hope for is that there is a massive sales drop (yeah right) and other companies don't try this...

...we're screwed, aren't we?
 

OmegaCheese

New member
Nov 19, 2009
252
0
0
I haven't even playred MW2 and I'm expecting it to not be as good as EVERYONE at my school says and talks and brags and EVERYTHING about games (except from REAL gamers) will come back to CoD 6 MW2
 

Rahnzan

New member
Oct 13, 2008
350
0
0
Hawwwwwww. HAWWWWW.

I don't want to know what happens at the end of the vietnam war (so...what, do we win or what?) I want to figure out what the hell happens to Makirov. Treyarch's multiplayer was a major rip off of Cod4 with little sense of weapon balance. I understand games of the same series playing similarly but there's a limit people. MW2 doesn't play like Cod4, and while that means some of us actually enjoyed the previous game, it still felt different enough.

They changed the setting to the rehashed pile of shit that is WWII from a setting I could actually take seriously and then they shat on the weapon balance. Why the hell would I want to pay yearly for more of that?

I wouldn't. So I won't. If they come out with a modern setting, maybe. Maybe I'll subscribe. But they'll need a damned good game to get me too.

*All assuming Treyarch is making the game, and it is to be set in vietnam.
 

Guy Montag

New member
Jan 9, 2010
40
0
0
CoD 7 will have subscription-based gameplay. You will have to subscribe $2 a month for use of the M16. Martyrdom is confirmed to be $10/month.

Kotick still expects the game to sell billions because these are the same people that bought MW2.
 

presidentjlh

New member
Feb 10, 2010
320
0
0
Honestly, I liked MW2, but yeah, the servers were shit. Like someone mentioned earlier, Battlefield: Bad Company 2 really has upped the ante on CoD.