As I said in another thread, I'm an open-minded person by nature, so I believe it is possible to justify killing in a certain situation or two.
Kill 1, save 99. There's an example.
Destroy a planet, save a galaxy.
Commit genocide against one particular "race", save the lives of untold billions in the future and ensure the survival of the human race on Earth well into the next twelve thousand years.
These are essentially volatile moral choices. You'd do well not to look at an issue such as "killing" in black and white.
And of course, as an obligatory domestic example, kill a serial rapist, save the lives of potentially countless women.
Kill 1, save 99. There's an example.
Destroy a planet, save a galaxy.
Commit genocide against one particular "race", save the lives of untold billions in the future and ensure the survival of the human race on Earth well into the next twelve thousand years.
These are essentially volatile moral choices. You'd do well not to look at an issue such as "killing" in black and white.
And of course, as an obligatory domestic example, kill a serial rapist, save the lives of potentially countless women.