Casual sex

Recommended Videos

Reman Khaar

New member
May 26, 2011
34
0
0
>.> Oh, happy day! I can actually discuss my feelings on this matter now without trying to word it into a conversation with one of my friends. *has been wanting to discuss this for a while now*

My thoughts on people having casual sex are soooo funny and sad at the same time, because they're completely different for the two sexes, and no matter how many arguments I throw for each gender either for or against them, it always seems to boil down to two instant knee-jerk reactions from me.


Female who engages in "casual sex": lol whore

Male who engages in "casual sex": My man! *brofist*



>.> I love it.
 

bluepilot

New member
Jul 10, 2009
1,150
0
0
I think it is a bad idea because of the increase of STIS, in particular the HPV virus because the condom does not offer full protection.

Having multiple sex partners is a risk factor ( to be honest, so is having sex), and there is nothing funny about a) getting an STI because a condom broke, b) genital warts (male and female) and cervical cancer (female only).

If you get and STI and it inches and burns and hurts why you pee, consider yourself lucky, some people can have no symptoms and then their lives will be in danger.

Both sex and fire have a lot in common. They are lots of fun to play with but can disfigure and kill.

Play safe, and avoid those who sleep around.
 

idodo35

New member
Jun 3, 2010
1,629
0
0
well for me the entire "friends with benefits" thing is like a landmine its just a bad idea standing on it sure itll be fun untill it blows up but when it does it just wont worth it...
but in general sure i think that fwb can be a nice and fun relationship just not the thing for me :p
 

feeback06

New member
Sep 14, 2010
539
0
0
I suppose I've had casual sex with two of my female friends, and it usually turned into a game of "okay, what am I allowed to do?"

If I were to date someone who had engaged in casual sex before, well obviously I would feel uneasy, but I could look past it (especially if they had another female friend who they wanted to try it ;))
 

Darkeagle6

New member
Nov 12, 2008
80
0
0
Johnny Impact said:
RollForInitiative said:
I generally have zero respect for people that do that, as I find they frequently have little respect for their own bodies either.

To each, their own, but I have very little interest in spending time with people like that.
Bingo.

There was a girl where I work -- gone now, thankfully -- who was six feet of curvaceous raven-haired beauty. She looked great and she knew it. Painted-on jeans, a little sashay in the hips, all that stuff. Half the guys developed crushes.

Thing is, she was a bar slut in the worst way. No respect for anyone, herself least of all. Her typical evening: "Get out of work, go make eyes at a hot guy, let him get me blitzed and take me to his place, wake up not knowing his name or where I am." I have no idea how many diseases she might have had. She tried to hug me once and I pushed her away for fear of catching something. Not even kidding.

I'm not a psychologist, but I get the impression she was trapped in a cycle of self-loathing and self-abuse, punishing herself for being a bar slut.....by being a bar slut.

Short version, she should have had one of those black and yellow signs over her head: DANGER, TOXIC WASTE.

I know you don't have to be a self-hating wreck of a human being to indulge in casual sex, but she's the image that comes to mind. I know at my age I won't be the first partner a woman has ever had, but when I know half the guys in town got there before me....

I can't see the appeal.
Ugh, nice. Lots of sexist drivel in this post, not least the use of the word "slut". Now, I have no idea if what you described of her "typical evening" is something she told you about herself or something you just assumed or were told second hand, but let's just address this as though this is indeed how *she* felt it. And it happens: people engage in self-destructive behaviour related to the source of their self hatred and get stuck in this spiral; I know I'm not the only one who's seen it happen and I know that a lot of people have testified to this as their experience.

But for Christ's sake, this does not make her a "slut", no matter what the reason she would be doing this. Slut is a stupid insult thrown at women for shaming women who dare to act in a manner which is deemed sexually inapropriate; in other words, for acting how she pleases with her own body. And no, saying that you call men sluts too or that it's not okay for men either isn't much better, because then you're just being both judgemental and repressing people's (or rather judging them for their) ownership over their bodies. And besides, someone who is stuck in such a self-destructive situation can hardly be said to be well in charge of their own sexuality; the use of the word "slut" in this case sounds like it's part victim-blaming as well (yay!).

And if she chooses to go out with a different man each night and have sex? So what? The worst you can say about it is that it's taking risks, which is true. Humans partake in a lot of risky activities, such as drinking, smoking, and sky-diving. Why single out sex, especially when it's done in a manner which minimizes risks? (most often with women, surprisingly enough) The excuse that says you're putting your partner at risk as well as yourself doesn't fly, because it goes both ways: Two adults agreeing to have sex implicitly understand the risks they're taking, assuming they're educated on the matter. Speaking of which, hugging a girl carries no danger of infection whatsoever, so you're either being ignorant or an ass. And other than the (real) danger of sex, what objections or left, other than religious or pseudo-religious moral ones? This isn't a rhetorical question, by the way; I really want to understand what reasons, other than religious, people may have to consider sex in this way.

But the whole "slut" bullshit isn't the only trace of sexism in this kind of talk. How about the following bit: "but when I know half the guys in town got there before me...."

This is taking a girl's own sexuality and making it solely about the guys who've had sex with her. It's about guys "getting there before me" rather than about her own experiences with sexuality. It's basically saying you come off as less of an alpha for getting with a girl who's "been had" by other males or something. It's like that stupid key and lock analogy that was popular not long ago. It makes sex less about individual *and* shared experiences and more about the man claiming the woman.

Finally, even if you believe that having sex with multiple partners is having no respect for your body and you choose to not do so, and even if all of your practices reflect this (so if you believe this because of the risk you're running, then you also reject all risky non-essential activities), you're still in no position to call people who do otherwise names like slut. People are allowed to have their own notions of what it is to respect one's self, and while you're fully entitled to disagree with them, insulting people for what is essentially having a different conception of their own selves is, at its best, completely presumptuous.
 

rokkolpo

New member
Aug 29, 2009
5,375
0
0
sumanoskae said:
Nieroshai said:
Emotionally, psychologically, we are wired to mate for life. If you take a partner for any length of time, sex with that person becomes associated with the relationship itself. Sleeping around only muddles this and leads to urges conflicting with emotional ties. People often end up feeling cheated even when there was no verbal "you and only you" agreement.
Not to disagree, I'm just confused, but... Aren't we wired NOT to mate for life. the divorce rate is like 40% isn't it?, and that's only people who got married.
Life used to be only 25(ish) years long.
I think that says something in the argument
 

Vault101

I'm in your mind fuzz
Sep 26, 2010
18,863
15
43
Id totally be all for it if it was with somone I knew/trusted

total strangers though? no way
 

Evidencebased

New member
Feb 28, 2011
248
0
0
Vault101 said:
Id totally be all for it if it was with somone I knew/trusted

total strangers though? no way
No kidding! "Hey, sexy, wanna go back to my place for some casual sex? Just... uh... promise you won't murdermeandcutupmybodykthx. o_0;"
 

ReservoirAngel

New member
Nov 6, 2010
3,781
0
0
I find it odd. Before I got into my "wanting a relationship" phase I did some stuff with both a couple of my friends and a few strangers here and there. And to this day I regret it whenever I think about it. It didn't get awkward with my friends but for a long time I had to avoid one of them until I could think up a way to say "I don't want to have sex with you ever again" without being a dick about it.

It's just... meaningless. I'm the kind of person who wants some meaning or attachment when I have sex and doing it with my friends for "well, we haven't got anything else to do" reasons just felt empty and shallow. Doing it with random one-night-stands is even more meaningless for me.

It kind of bums me out that my first time was with some random dude I met in a gay club rather than with my boyfriend. But oh well, no changing the past I suppose.
 

sinterklaas

New member
Dec 6, 2010
210
0
0
RollForInitiative said:
I generally have zero respect for people that do that, as I find they frequently have little respect for their own bodies either.

To each, their own, but I have very little interest in spending time with people like that.
You disgust me. There is nothing wrong with an action that doesn't hurt anyone or anything.

But go ahead, it's better for us all if people like you keep together in your narrowminded circles :)
 

Fallingwater

New member
Mar 20, 2009
177
0
0
RaisonD said:
What do you people think of casual sex or being friends with benefits?
If the other person is a girl and attractive, this is my ideal relationship with them, but I much prefer being friends with benefits than just "hi, wanna fuck?" *hump hump* "kthxbye", though I wouldn't refuse the latter if I couldn't have the former.

What do you think of women/men who sleep around a bit?
That they ain't sleeping around enough. Also that there aren't enough of them; in an ideal world everyone would be like that, and humanity would be a much less troubled race.

Would you consider going steady with someone like that?
Insofar as I'd consider going steady with someone, it could only be with a sexually open/free person. Having discovered myself to be an ethical slut [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Ethical_Slut], I no longer consider a sexually monogamous relationship feasible. Sentimentally monogamous yes (I'm not into polyamory), but there are too many great things to be experienced in sex to limit it to one partner.

Any experiences on the matter?
Sadly, not quite as many as I'd like. Don't know if it's just me or what, but I keep meeting girls with prehistoric opinions of what constitutes morally good sex and what doesn't. I wish more people would think logically about the whole thing, but then logical thought isn't exactly a widespread trait in our species. *sigh*

The Dr0w Ranger said:
"Why shouldn't we give in to our base urges?"
Because those include killing others(watch any group of territorial animals), which is still wrong I presume? Being natural doesn't make something right.
Yes, because killing people and boning people are exactly the same thing. See what I meant about logical thought?
 
Dec 16, 2009
1,774
0
0
i'm all for it
personally though, i think friends with benifits is better than sleeping around too much, regardless of gender

in france, do you thinka a dildo is refered to as la dildo or le dildo?
 

The Big Robb

New member
Aug 14, 2011
13
0
0
I'm all for it for other people. I don't see anything wrong with casual sex/ friends with benefits, because people should be allowed to have sex with people they trust.

But for me, personally, I'm looking for something more permanent, and in my personal experience, sex tends to ruin friendships for me, I just can't keep that kind of thing in context, so I avoid it.
 

Killclaw Kilrathi

Crocuta Crocuta
Dec 28, 2010
263
0
0
Casual sex is great, so long as both sides agree beforehand that it's strictly no strings attached. The only problem is when one person decides afterwards to change the deal and wants something serious, that happened to me and I wound up with a female stalker who kept trying to rope me into a relationship.