Censorship is REAL and ADVANCING

Recommended Videos

Bored Tomatoe

New member
Aug 15, 2008
3,619
0
0
s0denone said:
jim_doki said:
yeah, um, it's a PIRACY site. it's designed to steal things. I don't think you would get away with blatently stealing things under the grounds of free speech
Bored Tomatoe said:
Fight society! Pirate things, break windows, burn buildings to the ground! They can take away objects, but they can never take away your pride! Go! Show them you mean business.
I'm not fighting alongside piracy, I'm fighting against censorship; There is a huge fucking different you ignorant bastards.

I may not endorse the website, but I shouldn't be denied viewing it either. If they thought the webpage was breaking the law, they should shut it down, not censor it from their customers.

This is a spiral, it will only get worse, not better: That's why I'm concerned. This isn't the first case of cencorship in Denmark either. allofmp3.com was censored one or two years ago.
....I just like to have an excuse for chaos....
 

jim_doki

New member
Mar 29, 2008
1,942
0
0
Arcticflame said:
jim_doki said:
s0denone said:
I'm not fighting alongside piracy, I'm fighting against censorship; There is a huge fucking different you ignorant bastards.

I may not endorse the website, but I shouldn't be denied viewing it either. If they thought the webpage was breaking the law, they should shut it down, not censor it from their customers.

This is a spiral, it will only get worse, not better: That's why I'm concerned. This isn't the first case of cencorship in Denmark either. allofmp3.com was censored one or two years ago.
Nice to meet you, I'm Jim Doki and I'm about to hand you your ass.

Stealing is stealing. encouraging theft is illegal. Saying that you should be allowed to encourage stealing under the basis of free speech is ludicris. the otherer site you mentioned is ANOTHER questionably legal site. by your logic we should be allowed to view child pornography, because despite the fact we are endangering children, somebody has something to say
Hi my name is logical discussion.

Please read the above posts, as they seem to have gone over your head.
1, he called me a bastard
b, so what? you think that because an illegal website is censored, other legitimate websites are in danger? what logic is that based on?


EDIT
s0denone said:
jim_doki said:
s0denone said:
I'm not fighting alongside piracy, I'm fighting against censorship; There is a huge fucking different you ignorant bastards.

I may not endorse the website, but I shouldn't be denied viewing it either. If they thought the webpage was breaking the law, they should shut it down, not censor it from their customers.

This is a spiral, it will only get worse, not better: That's why I'm concerned. This isn't the first case of cencorship in Denmark either. allofmp3.com was censored one or two years ago.
Nice to meet you, I'm Jim Doki and I'm about to hand you your ass.

Stealing is stealing. encouraging theft is illegal. Saying that you should be allowed to encourage stealing under the basis of free speech is ludicris. the otherer site you mentioned is ANOTHER questionably legal site. by your logic we should be allowed to view child pornography, because despite the fact we are endangering children, somebody has something to say
How did you just hand me my ass? By acting like it?

Let me stress the fact that I am NOT fighting FOR piracy or ANYTHING ILLEGAL I am just worried that this will only get worse. Censorship is censorship. A torrent-site IS NOT ILLEGAL IN ITSELF, as it IS NOT HOSTING THE FILES, it is a MEDIUM.

This means the website has been DEEMED "inappropriate" by the government. Which I can't really see anything good coming out of, not in the near future, and certainly not in the distant future.
IT IS INNAPROPRIATE!!! try advertising stolen goods in your local newspaper and see what happens.
 

RebelRising

New member
Jan 5, 2008
2,230
0
0
Arcticflame said:
RebelRising said:
Isn't the piratebay.com a games piracy site? I would censor that.

What I don't like is censorship over enormously harmless things that are key in developing a healthy mentality, like a comprehension of sexuality, language and the realities of violence and people of different belief systems. That kind of censorship really gets up my ass.

But piracy? It's not only illegabut detrimental to the market from these goods are made and sold, so...what's wrong with banning it?
That's the point though. It's not as simple as Piracy = illegal. Therefore censorship and filtering is ok. It's about what the censorship could entail. Now that denmark has censored one website based on illegality, what else could they censor? They could censor anything which they deem illegal, and this line of thought has the potential to get very nasty.
I don't know too much about how checks and balances factor in that government, but illegality is illegality. I just think it's a little sensationalistic to assume that Denmark are just going censor everything now that one illegal, market-damaging site has been taken off.
 

s0denone

Elite Member
Apr 25, 2008
1,196
0
41
jim_doki said:
Arcticflame said:
jim_doki said:
s0denone said:
I'm not fighting alongside piracy, I'm fighting against censorship; There is a huge fucking different you ignorant bastards.

I may not endorse the website, but I shouldn't be denied viewing it either. If they thought the webpage was breaking the law, they should shut it down, not censor it from their customers.

This is a spiral, it will only get worse, not better: That's why I'm concerned. This isn't the first case of cencorship in Denmark either. allofmp3.com was censored one or two years ago.
Nice to meet you, I'm Jim Doki and I'm about to hand you your ass.

Stealing is stealing. encouraging theft is illegal. Saying that you should be allowed to encourage stealing under the basis of free speech is ludicris. the otherer site you mentioned is ANOTHER questionably legal site. by your logic we should be allowed to view child pornography, because despite the fact we are endangering children, somebody has something to say
Hi my name is logical discussion.

Please read the above posts, as they seem to have gone over your head.
1, he called me a bastard
b, so what? you think that because an illegal website is censored, other legitimate websites are in danger? what logic is that based on?
Thepiratebay.org IS NOT an illegal website, for gods sake: That's the root of the problem.
I'm not complaining if the government is banning child pornography. I am complaining when the government DECIDES that something is not SUITABLE for ME to view.

jim_doki said:
IT IS INNAPROPRIATE!!! try advertising stolen goods in your local newspaper and see what happens.
Do you really want me to answer that?
The government sure as hell don't ban the newspaper like they are banning websites.
They would find the SINGLE person advertising; like they should be searching for the "ringleaders" of piracy if they really want to get rid of it.
 

Dys

New member
Sep 10, 2008
2,343
0
0
jim_doki said:
s0denone said:
I'm not fighting alongside piracy, I'm fighting against censorship; There is a huge fucking different you ignorant bastards.

I may not endorse the website, but I shouldn't be denied viewing it either. If they thought the webpage was breaking the law, they should shut it down, not censor it from their customers.

This is a spiral, it will only get worse, not better: That's why I'm concerned. This isn't the first case of cencorship in Denmark either. allofmp3.com was censored one or two years ago.
Nice to meet you, I'm Jim Doki and I'm about to hand you your ass.

Stealing is stealing. encouraging theft is illegal. Saying that you should be allowed to encourage stealing under the basis of free speech is ludicris. the otherer site you mentioned is ANOTHER questionably legal site. by your logic we should be allowed to view child pornography, because despite the fact we are endangering children, somebody has something to say
Hand his ass back and hang your head in shame.
The pirate bay has pointed out, and will continue to point out, that they do not endorse people downloading copyrighted material that they do not have the license too. There are a LOT of legal things, such as movie trailers, game trailers, game demos and various projects that use torrents and sites like the piratebay.org as a method of distributing their material. By your logic it's fine if we fuck over the little people and remove their marketing tool, because some rich guys have decided they are losing money. Does this sound fair? It's like you being banned from spruiking on a street corner, and it is most definately not ok.

Surely then we should go all the way and ban the entire internet, as what you are proposing is we assrape all the filehosting services, companys/devs who develop third party mods and fixes for games and software, freeware programs and evey other form of indie development. You might be against piracy, but the people who will suffer because of your ignorance are not the pirates. Censorship is rarely a good thing, and in this case it will hurt honest peoples income.
 

jim_doki

New member
Mar 29, 2008
1,942
0
0
Dys said:
Hand his ass back and hang your head in shame.
The pirate bay has pointed out, and will continue to point out, that they do not endorse people downloading copyrighted material that they do not have the license too. There are a LOT of legal things, such as movie trailers, game trailers, game demos and various projects that use torrents and sites like the piratebay.org as a method of distributing their material. By your logic it's fine if we fuck over the little people and remove their marketing tool, because some rich guys have decided they are losing money?

Surely then we should go all the way and ban the entire internet, as what you are proposing is we assrape all the filehosting services, companys/devs who develop third party mods and fixes for games and software, freeware programs and evey other form of indie development. You might be against piracy, but the people who will suffer because of your ignorance are not the pirates.
It's called THE PIRATE BAY!!!! a BAY for PIRATES!!!! just because they have a disclaimer doesn't mean that they aren't encouraging. If they got rid of everything copyrighted, or showed me a document or a process saying they had the legal right to distribute what they had, then maybe i could believe them.
 

jim_doki

New member
Mar 29, 2008
1,942
0
0
s0denone said:
jim_doki said:
IT IS INNAPROPRIATE!!! try advertising stolen goods in your local newspaper and see what happens.
Do you really want me to answer that?
The government sure as hell don't ban the newspaper like they are banning websites.
They would find the SINGLE person advertising; like they should be searching for the "ringleaders" of piracy if they really want to get rid of it.
This i agree on. I do think they should be doing more to get rid of piracy. i just dont think that your concern about banning a questionably legal business is cause to start throwing up the censorship flag
 

Arcticflame

New member
Nov 7, 2006
1,063
0
0
jim_doki said:
Arcticflame said:
1, he called me a bastard
b, so what? you think that because an illegal website is censored, other legitimate websites are in danger? what logic is that based on?
How about I make my point clear.

Say if I go onto the pirate bay with every policeman in australia behind me, and all the judges and lawyers too.

I'm not breaking the law. I can refresh the page a million times and I'm still hundred percent fine.

Now I download a torrent.

Well now I am in a legal grey area.

Download the game illegally.

Well now im totally in the red.

The accessing the website isn't illegal, the act of downloading the torrent is.

Denmark has removed the initial stage, effectively stopping a non-illegal action. To use a metaphor, Instead of legal action against people taking drugs and selling drugs, they have made it illegal to talk to the drug dealer, no matter the context. Which is entirely wrong, and very totalatarian.

With a precedent now behind them (assuming no public outcry or legal case) they can spread their wings to things such as gagging websites abusing the government as they consider them "linked with terrorism". Or perhaps anything which abused the royals is censored.

Perhaps things which are considered wrong by the conservatives in denmark, like certain pornography, or perhaps censoring the entire youtube because it has some illegal content, despite the fact youtube itself censors its material.

Do you see now how it could get very nasty? Already in australia there is a possibility that MSN might be broken and Legal P2P or Direct connecting between computers (e.g. Hamachi) could be destroyed due to the attempt at censorship.
 

cleverlymadeup

New member
Mar 7, 2008
5,256
0
0
Dys said:
jim_doki said:
s0denone said:
I'm not fighting alongside piracy, I'm fighting against censorship; There is a huge fucking different you ignorant bastards.

I may not endorse the website, but I shouldn't be denied viewing it either. If they thought the webpage was breaking the law, they should shut it down, not censor it from their customers.

This is a spiral, it will only get worse, not better: That's why I'm concerned. This isn't the first case of cencorship in Denmark either. allofmp3.com was censored one or two years ago.
Nice to meet you, I'm Jim Doki and I'm about to hand you your ass.

Stealing is stealing. encouraging theft is illegal. Saying that you should be allowed to encourage stealing under the basis of free speech is ludicris. the otherer site you mentioned is ANOTHER questionably legal site. by your logic we should be allowed to view child pornography, because despite the fact we are endangering children, somebody has something to say
Hand his ass back and hang your head in shame.
The pirate bay has pointed out, and will continue to point out, that they do not endorse people downloading copyrighted material that they do not have the license too. There are a LOT of legal things, such as movie trailers, game trailers, game demos and various projects that use torrents and sites like the piratebay.org as a method of distributing their material. By your logic it's fine if we fuck over the little people and remove their marketing tool, because some rich guys have decided they are losing money?

Surely then we should go all the way and ban the entire internet, as what you are proposing is we assrape all the filehosting services, companys/devs who develop third party mods and fixes for games and software, freeware programs and evey other form of indie development. You might be against piracy, but the people who will suffer because of your ignorance are not the pirates.
actually you should go hang your head in shame, for a few reasons

1. the piratebay is ALL about piracy, sure you can find some legal torrents on their but they are rather rare to find

2. legal torrents can be legally downloaded from other sites besides the piratebay, such as the company/developer's website

3. those developing third party mods have legal permission to do so and have nothing to do with pirates

4. indie developers having MANY forms of distribution besides the piratebay to earn money as they don't get money from the piratebay as their only goal is to give stuff away for free

5. other legal torrent sites have nothing in common with the piratebay besides the fact they use bittorrent
 

Locust

New member
Jan 30, 2009
70
0
0
jim_doki said:
Stealing is stealing. encouraging theft is illegal. Saying that you should be allowed to encourage stealing under the basis of free speech is ludicris. the otherer site you mentioned is ANOTHER questionably legal site. by your logic we should be allowed to view child pornography, because despite the fact we are endangering children, somebody has something to say
Consider this: Torrents don't necessarily hurt anyone. Child pornography does. Child porn humiliates and scars a young child for the rest of their life, and their family are going to be distraught as hell over it. Torrents just mean you can get music, games and movies without throwing money at a bunch of mega corporations.

Yes, it is undeniably questionably legal, but is a world where the public, normal person forced to throw money at the higher class in order to enjoy basic things in life a world you want to live in? How is that any different from the dark ages where only the rich enjoyed life and the peasantry wallowed in misery? I don't see why I should have to work for 40 hours a week to afford a bunch of new albums, when I can get them for free and the people I'm giving the money to don't even need it. Why should someone have to put in that much effort just to contribute money to a rock band or celebrity so they can afford their new jet a few months earlier?

If someone needs or deserves the money, I'm all for it. I know for a fact I'd throw money at companies like Valve or Relic, because they put effort into their games and focus on enjoyment above money. I'd also throw money at a new company who genuinely needed it to get a headstart and made a good product. But no, I'm completely against the idea of people spending so much cash for companies like EA or a giant record label, because frankly they don't need it and the majority of the time their products exist solely to milk cash from you (For example, a shitload of Sims expansions or more recently, a silly Spore parts pack which charged you 1/4 the price of a normal game when it was virtually useless). Companies like that make more than enough money from subscriptions, live shows, conventions and cinema showings.
 

cleverlymadeup

New member
Mar 7, 2008
5,256
0
0
Arcticflame said:
The accessing the website isn't illegal, the act of downloading the torrent is.

Denmark has removed the initial stage, effectively stopping a non-illegal action. To use a metaphor, Instead of legal action against people taking drugs and selling drugs, they have made it illegal to talk to the drug dealer, no matter the context. Which is entirely wrong, and very totalatarian.
actually no viewing it is in a legal grey area as there is intent, you don't go to the piratebay and think to yourself "well let me just have a quick look and see what's going on" you go to the piratebay and think "well let's see what's there that i can download"

as was pointed out earlier in the thread and using your same example blocking a child porn site would be wrong as simply opening the page isn't illegal but dl'n the pics or uploading any would be illegal.
 

Arcticflame

New member
Nov 7, 2006
1,063
0
0
cleverlymadeup said:
Arcticflame said:
The accessing the website isn't illegal, the act of downloading the torrent is.

Denmark has removed the initial stage, effectively stopping a non-illegal action. To use a metaphor, Instead of legal action against people taking drugs and selling drugs, they have made it illegal to talk to the drug dealer, no matter the context. Which is entirely wrong, and very totalatarian.
actually no viewing it is in a legal grey area as there is intent, you don't go to the piratebay and think to yourself "well let me just have a quick look and see what's going on" you go to the piratebay and think "well let's see what's there that i can download"

as was pointed out earlier in the thread and using your same example blocking a child porn site would be wrong as simply opening the page isn't illegal but dl'n the pics or uploading any would be illegal.
No. There is no grey area there at all.

It's not illegal.

RebelRising said:
I don't know too much about how checks and balances factor in that government, but illegality is illegality. I just think it's a little sensationalistic to assume that Denmark are just going censor everything now that one illegal, market-damaging site has been taken off.
It is a reality in australia. If the government gets it's way then my internet will be slowed, and many direct connections blocked due to a heavy handed blanket ban on connections in an attempt to stop "illegal material".

Suddenly it's not so sensationalistic.
 

jim_doki

New member
Mar 29, 2008
1,942
0
0
Locust said:
jim_doki said:
Stealing is stealing. encouraging theft is illegal. Saying that you should be allowed to encourage stealing under the basis of free speech is ludicris. the otherer site you mentioned is ANOTHER questionably legal site. by your logic we should be allowed to view child pornography, because despite the fact we are endangering children, somebody has something to say
Consider this: Torrents don't necessarily hurt anyone.
fail

piracy hurts actors, distributers, producers, the poor schmo who presses the DVD's for a living, the projectionist, the ticket collector.
 

Locust

New member
Jan 30, 2009
70
0
0
jim_doki said:
fail

piracy hurts actors, distributers, producers, the poor schmo who presses the DVD's for a living, the projectionist, the ticket collector.
Did you even bother to take the time to read any of my post?
 

theklng

New member
May 1, 2008
1,229
0
0
i have reasons to suspect this untrue based on my location and experience. i checked this less than 30 seconds ago.
 

Arcticflame

New member
Nov 7, 2006
1,063
0
0
jim_doki said:
Locust said:
jim_doki said:
Stealing is stealing. encouraging theft is illegal. Saying that you should be allowed to encourage stealing under the basis of free speech is ludicris. the otherer site you mentioned is ANOTHER questionably legal site. by your logic we should be allowed to view child pornography, because despite the fact we are endangering children, somebody has something to say
Consider this: Torrents don't necessarily hurt anyone.
fail

piracy hurts actors, distributers, producers, the poor schmo who presses the DVD's for a living, the projectionist, the ticket collector.
I would like to say piracy isn't stealing. I'm not saying its not illegal and wrong, but it is not theft of a physical nature. It's conceptual theft at best as it does not steal property beyond a possibility, and does not take something away from them in a physical sense.
 

jim_doki

New member
Mar 29, 2008
1,942
0
0
Locust said:
jim_doki said:
fail

piracy hurts actors, distributers, producers, the poor schmo who presses the DVD's for a living, the projectionist, the ticket collector.
Did you even bother to take the time to read any of my post?
yes. it was all about how corporations are evil and therefor you dont have to pay them. I was pointing out that maybe there were people getting hurt that you didn't realise were getting hurt.
 

jim_doki

New member
Mar 29, 2008
1,942
0
0
Arcticflame said:
I would like to say piracy isn't stealing. I'm not saying its not illegal and wrong, but it is not theft of a physical nature. It's conceptual theft at best as it does not steal property beyond a possibility, and does not take something away from them in a physical sense.
It is stealing, its quite simple, you are taking something that doesn't belong to you
 

Sgt. Pepper

New member
Aug 17, 2008
66
0
0
Arcticflame said:
Denmark has removed the initial stage, effectively stopping a non-illegal action. To use a metaphor, Instead of legal action against people taking drugs and selling drugs, they have made it illegal to talk to the drug dealer, no matter the context. Which is entirely wrong, and very totalatarian.
Yes, because usually I like to make small talk with drug dealers.

Secondly, the 'slippery slope' argument is seeming to make the rounds here. Sorry guys, but that argument isn't always applicable. I guess since the government says how fast you can drive, they'll be telling us how fast we can eat, and how fast we can walk, and how fast we can take showers! OH MY GOD GEORGE ORWELL WAS RIGHT! QUICK, EVERYONE, SCATTER BEFORE THE GOVERNMENT AGENTS FIND YOUUUUUU!
 

cainx10a

New member
May 17, 2008
2,191
0
0
jim_doki said:
Locust said:
jim_doki said:
Stealing is stealing. encouraging theft is illegal. Saying that you should be allowed to encourage stealing under the basis of free speech is ludicris. the otherer site you mentioned is ANOTHER questionably legal site. by your logic we should be allowed to view child pornography, because despite the fact we are endangering children, somebody has something to say
Consider this: Torrents don't necessarily hurt anyone.
fail

piracy hurts actors, distributers, producers, the poor schmo who presses the DVD's for a living, the projectionist, the ticket collector.
This. I can't believe there are people naive enough to defend thepiratebay.org, seriously people, complain when there are real issues of censorship where freedom of speech is being harmed.

Defending pirates is only putting you on the same level as them.