Not really... the owners of the dogs are usually far more loving.Eatbrainz said:3 words. Human. Dog. Show.
If it was just dressing up and walking on a stage I would agree, it won't harm them at all... it is the 'behind the scenes' elements that make this the most disgusting. The way the children are treated, verbally and in cases physically abused, if they are not the best doll up there. The way their lives are dictated and run when they are at home all so the parent can be 'assured' they will have a pageant winner. They are treating their kids like living dolls and nothing more, a possession to be shown off and nothing more. .Lonan said:I don't think it will affect their lives in anyway. They're seven, they had to dress up in some clothes and walk on stage. Big whoop. I think they will be fine. My issue is with the people who make them do it.toapat said:the parents who force their kids to do this deserve nothing short of 30 stabs to the throat
plus, you really want to fuck your kids life over forever?
What I was saying is that when you parade little girls on a stage so that people can judge how beautiful they are, that seems a lot more creepy than a 15 year old male having sex with say, a 25 year old female pornstar. But that is prohibited in the U.S., which seems ridiculous. If it did happen, most people would probably not think it was pedophilia, but if it was between a 25 year old male and a 15 year old male, it would be FAR more likely considered pedophilia. Even if the 15 year old is gay. There's just no persional choice until you reach 18. I don't know where I came off as a "creeper" but the idea that no one over 18 can have anything to do with someone under 18 is ridiculous. Maybe that's the part that tipped you off. If a 25 year old woman and a 15 year old girl had lesbian relations, would that be pedophilia? Less likely that the two males combination, but more likely that the 25 year old female and the 15 year old male combination. Do you see where I'm going with this? Natural homophobia impacts public policy decisions. Basically, I see little little girls being paraded on stage, and I would consider it pedophilia. But it's apparently ok. Would it slide if it were boys? I don't think so. People would be outraged and use the word "pedophile" and it would be stopped. But that isn't happening here, so what's going on? I think it's creepy for either gender to be paraded on stage at such a young age, as you do. But I'm noticing that it's more acceptable for girls to be used this way.Mcface said:Sounds like your a creeper, honestly.Lonan said:Isn't this the same country which has 18 as the age of consent and many view anything sexual between someone over 18 and someone younger than 18 makes the older person an evil satanic beast who should be put down? And yet it's legal to parade 7 year old girls on stage so that they judged by how beautiful they are, or how "hot" to use the more modern term? I can't help but wonder if all this talk of pedophilia is just another form of homophobia when there is such blatant hypocrisy. Although I don't know too much about the U.S.
pedophilia is pedophilia...Lonan said:What I was saying is that when you parade little girls on a stage so that people can judge how beautiful they are, that seems a lot more creepy than a 15 year old male having sex with say, a 25 year old female pornstar. But that is prohibited in the U.S., which seems ridiculous. If it did happen, most people would probably not think it was pedophilia, but if it was between a 25 year old male and a 15 year old male, it would be FAR more likely considered pedophilia. Even if the 15 year old is gay. There's just no persional choice until you reach 18. I don't know where I came off as a "creeper" but the idea that no one over 18 can have anything to do with someone under 18 is ridiculous. Maybe that's the part that tipped you off. If a 25 year old woman and a 15 year old girl had lesbian relations, would that be pedophilia? Less likely that the two males combination, but more likely that the 25 year old female and the 15 year old male combination. Do you see where I'm going with this? Natural homophobia impacts public policy decisions. Basically, I see little little girls being paraded on stage, and I would consider it pedophilia. But it's apparently ok. Would it slide if it were boys? I don't think so. People would be outraged and use the word "pedophile" and it would be stopped. But that isn't happening here, so what's going on? I think it's creepy for either gender to be paraded on stage at such a young age, as you do. But I'm noticing that it's more acceptable for girls to be used this way.Mcface said:Sounds like your a creeper, honestly.Lonan said:Isn't this the same country which has 18 as the age of consent and many view anything sexual between someone over 18 and someone younger than 18 makes the older person an evil satanic beast who should be put down? And yet it's legal to parade 7 year old girls on stage so that they judged by how beautiful they are, or how "hot" to use the more modern term? I can't help but wonder if all this talk of pedophilia is just another form of homophobia when there is such blatant hypocrisy. Although I don't know too much about the U.S.
Thirded. These kids grow up neurotic. They end up crazy with eating disorders. Just like their crazy moms.624 said:/threadAmrasCalmacil said:Wrong. Very wrong.