Chivalry is dead. And wymen/womyn killed it.

[Dommyboy]

I just enjoyed the story of you getting verbally slaughtered.

 

[Lord Krunk]

"Do to others as you want done to yourself."

Cheeze_Pavillion, you do realise that if you were to do as mentioned in the three examples, it appears as if you want to be respected and adored in return. The world doesn't act that way, I'm sorry to say.

Don't throw petrol onto a fire.

I don't see what you're getting at.

What you said, in relation to the premise of the thread, was quite hypocritical.

 

[Rankao]

It is a problem. Particularly annoying are the women on daytime shows who claim to 'speak for all women'. They have me swearing at the television, saying that the word 'mankind' is sexist and other such militant feminist bull.

That's one thing I do enjoy about being a white male, I don't have any one person who claims to represent me and all of my views. When you look at a jack-ass white male and he says he represents the oppress men. You think to yourself, "wow that dude is a jack-ass. "

When you have a jack ass member of 'x' group, people (not me but just the common consenses) tend to say, "Wow see thats why I hate group 'x'."

Because of recent years I have became a bastard, likely if that was to happen to me, I would have slapped the women right their and said. "I don't old doors open for women, I hole doors open for my fellow mankind." Then again I likely wouldn't have someone yell at me, because when I hope doors open for people, I give a very light grin and a quick bow of my head as respect. Somehow I find people to react differently to that then just a big grin and stare into their eyes.

 

[Lord Krunk]

"Do to others as you want done to yourself."

Cheeze_Pavillion, you do realise that if you were to do as mentioned in the three examples, it appears as if you want to be respected and adored in return. The world doesn't act that way, I'm sorry to say.

Don't throw petrol onto a fire.

I don't see what you're getting at.

What you said, in relation to the premise of the thread, was quite hypocritical.

Why exactly is it hypocritical? I still don't know what you mean by "if you were to do as mentioned in the three examples": as the women? as the posters?

Yes. If you were to act like the women referenced in your examples, would you call it an act of chivalry?

 

[Derpus von Herpus]

Chivalry is indeed dying, but it's not feminists' fault. Don't get me wrong - I'm a dude, I do all sorts of dudely things, and I do hate rampant radical feminism, but we honestly can't blame them for us not being polite and "chivalrous". I'd go into more detail but that's so far off-topic that it deserves its own thread.

I guess what I'm saying is: Who gives a flying fuck at a rolling donut what that woman said. Stupid people are everywhere. Keep getting doors for people and being polite.

 

[Lord Krunk]

"Do to others as you want done to yourself."

Cheeze_Pavillion, you do realise that if you were to do as mentioned in the three examples, it appears as if you want to be respected and adored in return. The world doesn't act that way, I'm sorry to say.

Don't throw petrol onto a fire.

I don't see what you're getting at.

What you said, in relation to the premise of the thread, was quite hypocritical.

Why exactly is it hypocritical? I still don't know what you mean by "if you were to do as mentioned in the three examples": as the women? as the posters?

Yes. If you were to act like the women referenced in your examples, would you call it an act of chivalry?

Would I call *what* an act of chivalry? What the the women did? No, but they never claimed to be being chivalrous, so I'm still at a loss about what you're trying to express.

The fact that it doesn't apply when there is only one party being chivalrous.

 

[Lord Krunk]

"Do to others as you want done to yourself."

Cheeze_Pavillion, you do realise that if you were to do as mentioned in the three examples, it appears as if you want to be respected and adored in return. The world doesn't act that way, I'm sorry to say.

Don't throw petrol onto a fire.

I don't see what you're getting at.

What you said, in relation to the premise of the thread, was quite hypocritical.

Why exactly is it hypocritical? I still don't know what you mean by "if you were to do as mentioned in the three examples": as the women? as the posters?

Yes. If you were to act like the women referenced in your examples, would you call it an act of chivalry?

Would I call *what* an act of chivalry? What the the women did? No, but they never claimed to be being chivalrous, so I'm still at a loss about what you're trying to express.

The fact that it doesn't apply when there is only one party being chivalrous.

How can a woman be chivalrous or not to a man? That makes no sense.

It's more of a courtesy thing, really.

 

[Lord Krunk]

...Then it's not chivalry.

The term you're looking for is "subservient."

Um, sorry?

I would not think that both parties being polite would be considered submissive or obedient. I would consider it more under the term 'respectful'.

 

[meatloaf231]

...Then it's not chivalry.

The term you're looking for is "subservient."

No, it's not subservience. It's courtesy and respect. When someone helps me do anything, whether I need the help or not, I thank them. Even if the help was unwanted and completely useless, I thank them. I don't see how this could be considered subservient.

Edited for calmness: Eggo, if you would kindly refrain from doing this:

Speaking of literature, did anyone ever notice how one-sided "The Vagina Monologues" are?

Speaking of which, did anyone ever notice how one-sided the last couple millenia have been?

It doesn't make me see your arguments in a very neutral way. It's not witty, it's not clever, and it certainly isn't mature. The only way your arguments are going to get any serious consideration is if you present them in a manner that doesn't sound so hostile.

 

[meatloaf231]

And I don't believe in anything; stop being so appallingly melodramatic. It's only a forum.

Ahahaha, sorry, I just knew that you would say something along the lines of "I don't believe in anything."

I apologize for my previous post; I re-read it now and it sounds very spiteful, and that was not my intention at all. My purpose was to inform you of something that has bothered me about the way you present your arguments for some time.