... Except they stated a while ago that they were going to have events from the first impact the second [http://www.videogamer.com/news/14-03-2008-7778.html].Indigo_Dingo said:Like I said, as not every single person on earth bought Mass Effect, they can't do that because there are always gonna be people who didn't play the first.Fire Daemon said:No, you have it wrong. Mass Effect 2 is supposed to continue directly from Mass Effect. The things that happen in the first one, say being rude about Joker's bone disease or declining the fans autograph are still present in the sequel. Some of the more important moments can be solved with a questionnaire (I expect this to be in the 360 and PC versions as well so that newcomers don't have to have a cookie cut back story) but even if you do this, the player will have no idea whats going on. Mass Effect explained a lot of things, not knowing the story cripple the play experience of Mass Effect 2.Indigo_Dingo said:Lets see, Condemned 2, Saints Row 2, Dead Rising 2, Call of Duty 3.....Clemenstation said:I'm guessing 360 + PC. Does it really make sense to release Mass Effect 2 for the PS3 when the first one hasn't even been ported over?
...or has it? A quick Google search says "rumour, rumour, rumour", circa 2007.
You're mixing up the developers (VALVe) with the Publishers (EA). The Publishers have near nothing to do with where the game goes if the developers are not willing to develop for a system.bioVOLTAGE said:But people forget that EA published Left 4 Dead. That only came out for the Xbox 360 and PC. So there is precidence for EA shunning the PS3 if the developer whishes to.
Of course there are going to be some people who didn't play the original, thats to expected, but a lot of people did play Mass Effect, especially the Sci-fi and WRPG fans. The people that didn't play Mass Effect 1 are not the people that want to play Mass Effect 2. There is not going to be a large group of people who have bought the second without getting the first. There will be some, yes, but those people will be a very small minority. Your logic seems similar to "Oh we can't make The Empire strikes back because people might not have seen A new hope and when they go to see The Empire strikes back they will be confused and not understand whats going". People that want to play Mass Effect 2 want to play it because they played Mass Effect 1. There is very few people that will look at Mass Effect 2, have no idea what its about, buy the game and then get annoyed because they have to take a neutral response.Indigo_Dingo said:For people who didn't play the first, they go with a neutral response to all of these things happening. Simply put, they cannot make it mandatory to play the other games in order to make this game work - it doesn't make sense.
Well, the problem with that is that your Mass Effect 1 character is supposed to be transferrable to Mass Effect 2. Part of what was so fun about the first Mass Effect is how you chose to level up your character - you had a choice of sex, looks, class and skills. If someone starts Mass Effect 2 without a character generated from the first, they are going to have to start with a pre-made character, which kinda kills part of the fun of the first game.Indigo_Dingo said:You misunderstand me - I'm not talking about people who haven't played thefirst, I'm talking about people playing without the data for the first - people who were forced to delete it to make room on their Hard Drive, people who used the 360 and are getting the PC version, vice versa, and so on.
And I'm more saying "we can't make it so they have to present their ticket stubs for A New Hope to get into Empire Strikes Back"