Craziest conspiracy theories

Recommended Videos

Jinx_Dragon

New member
Jan 19, 2009
1,274
0
0
Shaoken said:
They can, have and have been done to death.
Actually most have not, aside from people online throwing back theories to and fro. Most are rediculous and easily explained away bit not all are. To claim because a few have been that all are, is folly.

Why do you think they had a bomb? Honestly, that's just f**king stupid. If planes were hijacked then why would you use a bomb? It would be a dead giveaway that something was up and create suspicion.
Given how many planes have exploded cause of explosives I would say 'dead giveaway' is a long shot at best. I have this idea because the people on those planes, using sat phones, SAID AS MUCH! We can argue if it was a threat of a bomb, or a real bomb, but that is a moot point as the possibility of there being a bomb has been raised as a red flag. One that has not been adequately addressed! I do believe the government downplayed this for a simple reason, after 3000 people died heads would have to roll if such a massive breach of security was even investigated, the panic would be instant and people would demand action against those believed to be responcable for such a breach... even if there wasn't one.

Box cutters though? Who could of suspected that, easily smuggled on and not really looked for prior to 9/11... good escape goat there.

All your points, actually
You have NO understanding of norad, not any ability to even google norad. In fact most of your points are down right ridiculous statements not based at all in reality. I don't know how to respond to such ramblings, cause all my arguments would assume a level of reality. 24/7 war drills? Red tape preventing any communications between organisations? Super sonic jets unable to catch up with civilian passenger craft? A simple transponder being turned off eliminating all ability to track?

You reach for anything to make it look as if Norad is incompetent at best, or at worse is some long dead paperweight organization that even the people working for it mistaking believe is in charge of something. In this case the organization wasn't up to par because it had been crippled, and you want to ignore that reality by putting into doubt norads ability to do it's damn job. The only job they have, the one the name is based on, defending the airspace over America!

Any other day it would of had jets in the air, parallel to any of those passenger planes, within half a hour... tops. Now we could argue if they would of ordered them to be shot down, let alone in time. That would be reasonable to ponder on... but your argument that norad is a cold war dinosaur without the ability to function effective. It makes me think of libertarianism, and the fact they would rather believe every governmental body is unable to function as justification for ridding them all.

I'm not even going to waste time on it. Google can be your friend, use the damn thing. On reflection I take this back. With the amount of 9/11 bullshit floating around any google on norad is going to bounce you through years worth of 'chaff.' Google is not your friend when there is mind boggling amounts of matches to your quarry.

You're looking too much into things. There are plenty of examples of sus activitives taking place at the same time of these kinds of events. It's just a concidence in the end.
Potentially but most importantly: 3000 people died! This isn't some little thing here we can half arse away. It deserves to be looked at closer and made sure all concidences are just that. The fact is NO ONE really did so. They left so much unexplored all to shit out a 'offical story' so fast that alone is sus, but likely a coincidence as they wanted to look competent after enough screw ups to maybe even demand a impeachment hearing. The investigation we had was damage control, designed first and foremost to ensure the US government would not face any blame, and not really about finding out what happened.

Yeah, Northwood....a plan that the US Government rejected because a few students would die. And I should point out that the government themselves declassified Northwood. So the evidence you're using to say that they could do 9/11....was given to you by them. If anything that's proof they weren't involved; why would they declassify material that would implicate themselves?
I would point out that ONE man regected, one man who had morality put the plan down when all the people around him wanted it, pushed for it and where angered over his decision to not do it. Your telling me that similar thinking men, to those would be murders, magical disappeared when JFK told them no? That anyone who might think 'letting US people died for political gain' just vanished off the face of the earth at that moment and where never replaced in government by
like minded people ever again?

Reality to you, there are many people who don't give a fuck about each other and lot of them gravitate to positions of power. I don't have a doubt for a second if some CIA bigwig would loose a moments sleep if he decided to off a US citizens cause he believed, that there is the scary part about these people, that it was 'for the better good.'

As for the declassification, that was because of laws. A whole bunch of files where opened up and vola, it happened to be one. No one thought 'you know what, lets release this document and that one but not that one.' No they released a whole box load of documents, many of them actually, of which this happened to be just one.

See, you, like a lot of the conspiracy nuts seem to think that the US government is one single, long and unbroken chain, of 'selected' people from a shadow puppet government that controls everything. Under such a system it would be reasonable to say that all governmental secrets would remain forever berried but we don't have that system. People are elected, the government changes hands and often things that are classified sit there, unknown what is in them, till the freedom of information act gets a hold of them.

Hell I would be willing to bet the people who could of maybe berried it for another dozen years, even in violation of law, didn't even know it existed prior to it's release.

In any case I brought Northwood up to disprove one thing - The myth that the US government would not target it's own people. The documents existence means they ALREADY HAVE! Yet here you are trying to say that the documents existence is evidence no one will ever think that way again... bulllll shiiiiit!

It wasn't made for a 'this is the master plan here people' argument, cause after all we didn't blame Cuba did we. Its existence proves that there are have been people in the government, and likely are still, that will have no qualms about killing US citizens for 'the greater good.' But you can continue to live in your little, strange, reality where human nature doesn't exist and all governmental organizations are incompetent beyond belief.

And the fact that you're alive, with this knowledge, is proof enough they had nothing to do with it. If they're willing to let 3000 people die then surely it'd be no small problem to kill people like you and make it look like an ancident.
Now this shows you are even more delusional I think. I am NOTHING to these people, not even a blimp on the radar. You know, those devices they use to track planes. Hell, on the ladder of 'threats to the USA' I rate below 'global warming' and somewhere above 'earth worm plague.' You know what, hell, I would be willing to admit that the one nameless (I don't know it, but I think he must have one) guy who has did this is more worried about the earth worms then a single internet based political commenter.
 

Jinx_Dragon

New member
Jan 19, 2009
1,274
0
0
I may have taken a little more out on you then I should of, sorry about that. Your argument still is quite weak, based all around a organization detected to defending north American airspace is unable, and never was, intercept a single aircraft. I will try and give an answer, but I do still doubt your interested given weak arguments you have put forth.

1) Their view is over the whole if US airspace, from outside inwards. They have direct ties with radar stations, get live feed from all airports and anything else geared towards doing the job of defending the airspace of the north American region. They are a hub where information comes together and any threat is responded to, it is the sole job they have.

I find it hard to believe the military is that incompetent when it comes to defending US airspace and that is the core of your argument. Do you really believe the US military, with one of the most technical air forces in the world, is that useless?

2) Do you honestly believe all they do is sit back and twiddle their thumbs while the computers run test after test? That all that 'outwards looking' technology is being used to play endless games of high-tech chess? This isn't your real thoughts is it, cause even that one I can't fathom... that all they do is sit around and play 'war games.' Though, if this is true, irony is defiantly with a sense of humor... one of those 'war games' was the very thing you say Norad is bad at doing, intercepting aircraft that have been hijacked.

3) You have ignored all procedures here. The moment the transponder went offline it is to be taken as a hijacking until other wise proven. We could argue that, this time, it wasn't done by the book but that takes a massive leap of faith to assume that multiple airports all dropped the ball at the same time during such a worse attack is a bit far fetched. If procedures where followed it would of taken minutes for the people at the top of the ladder, you know one of those rungs being Norad, to have a picture of what was happening.

The reason no picture was forth coming wasn't some imagined red tape. It was because those higher up rungs where already dealing with dozens of other hijacking situations. None of which where real, of course, but the real ones got lost in the fake and the whole system was slowed down just trying to get the message of a real hijacking through the 'war games.'

3) I think you have fallen into a 'splitting hairs' situation here. There has been only one interception if you choose only to count planes that where intercepted over US soil, and not say out to sea for example. Hijacked planes are not that common and when they normally happen the hijackers tend to be more South American in decent then Middle Eastern, turning the planes down into the gulf from the coastal cities normally targeted. But it is a good hair splitting technique if you want to spread misinformation about how relevant Norad is in a hijack situation.

The slow response times here is because they launched the craft from to far away, they do have planes ready to launch in minutes and many bases where closer. But when you have dozens of dots as 'potential hijacked planes' it is a little difficult to know which base would get the best results. Yes these planes never would of made it, but it wasn't cause they couldn't of. It was cause they didn't know which dot was real and which was simulation and made the wrong call.

Norads failure always comes back to that 'war game' and the fact it was running. I once more state: What is the probability of a terrorist attack involving aircrafts happening while a top secret 'war game' was underway?

Probably on par of winning the lottery on your very first ever ticket.
 

Beero

New member
Oct 17, 2009
54
0
0
I think we are trying to get to mars, because the government accidently decided to let the aliens build a hyperspace bypass, for which earth needs to be demolished.....

That or the fact that the cake isn't a lie, but well hidden somewhere by.....something
 

CloggedDonkey

New member
Nov 4, 2009
4,055
0
0
I'm waiting for 2013 to go by and all those idiots go "we miscounted, it was those damn democrats, wasn't it, or maybe that Nazi Obama lied and it is 2011, ya that's it." No offense to republicans, just people like that seam to think that after planing every event for the next 2000 years he didn't get a beer, and then the Spanish show up and kill every one. Ho, and someone saying nukes don't exist.
 

Smagmuck_

New member
Aug 25, 2009
12,681
0
0
Dividing by zero will destroy the universe. I will prove you all wrong!!! Mwahahaha!
*Beep*...
*Beep*...
*Beep*...
*Beep*...
...
OH NOEZ! I WAZ WRONGZ! WE ARE ALL DOOMZ HORRIBLE DEATHZ!!! AARRGG!!
 

Shoqiyqa

New member
Mar 31, 2009
1,266
0
0
MGlBlaze said:
Mythbusters did an entire episode devoted to proving the Moon Landings did in fact happen, tackling the three biggest things Conspiracy Theorists pointed out. What do you know, turns out none of them were faked.
Of course, that didn't stop Conspiracy Theorists from continuing to say they were faked... *sigh*
No, they didn't.

What Mythbusters did was demonstrate that they'd find it quite difficult to convincingly fake a moon landing from their studio.

That was all.

...

Anyway, my nomination for crazy conspiracy theory: Barack Obama's a Muslim communist.

...

ottenni said:
... the US invaded Iraq for oil (if they did why didn't they just save themselves the trouble and invade Qatar, Kuwait and Brunei instead?).
Two words: popular support. Iraq was the enemy left over from '91. Kuwait was the ally left over from '91. Iraq had gassed and bombed Kurds and the Marsh Arabs and so on. Heck, we knew Saddam used to have chemical weapons because we gave them to him. It was a lot easier to make invading Iraq popular. Iraq's got a lot more gold than Kuwait, too.

Care to suggest a different reason? Military foothold outside Israel? Interceptor missile and radar bases adjacent to Iran? Getting out of Saudi Arabia so we could stop supporting their regime because we care so much about human rights?

...

Aptspire said:
FOX News: OMG Obama iz a Terrorizt!!!
I was like: seriously, some ppl believe this crap?
People do, partly because they want to. It works quite well for FOX. Give the people an enemy and say that you and your colleagues in the political wing (don't actually call them that, though; maintain your façade of independence) are fighting against that enemy who would undermine the Constitution and freedom of the USA, and the people will fully support your colleagues' destruction of that same constitution and those freedoms.

It's always a simple matter to drag the people along, whether it's a democracy, a fascist dictatorship, a parliament or a communist dictatorship. Voice or no voice, the people can always be brought to the bidding of the leaders. That is easy. All you have to do is tell them they are being attacked. [http://www.snopes.com/quotes/goering.asp]

The state must declare the child to be the most precious treasure of the people. As long as the government is perceived as working for the benefit of the children, the people will happily endure almost any curtailment of liberty and almost any deprivation. [http://www.amazon.co.uk/Mein-Kampf-Adolf-Hitler/dp/817224164X/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1257591474&sr=8-1]

...

cartzo said:
you could walk to germany in 12 hours.
From parts of Belgium, Denmark, Austria, France and Poland, among others, you can! You can try from Switzerland, too, but there's quiet a large lake along the border there and you have to be careful not to fall in.

...

cuddly_tomato said:
My dad watched it live on the telly. Same with 9/11. I watched those aeroplanes fly into the towers, live on TV.
Really? Both of them?

...

Symplify said:
That there is a magical man in the sky who watches everything you and everyone else does and judges you all when you die to see whether or not you are worthy of entering his super-exclusive club of endless happiness.
Oh, come off it. I know the thread didn't specify plausible conspiracy theories, but you've got to come up with something someone might believe beyond puberty.

...

ottenni said:
As it happens i do have a better reason why the US would want to invade Iraq. To quote George Bush "This is a massive and difficult undertaking, it is worth our effort, it is worth our sacrifice, ... ". Basically he thought that if he could bring democracy and freedom to Iraq ...
Heh. So that's why "he" invaded Iraq?

Thursday, November 06, 2003

# Posted 7:32 PM by Patrick Belton


MORE ON THIS IN THE MORNING: But incredible kudos to the president for giving this speech today at NED outlining a coherent U.S. policy of democracy promotion. Initial coverage is in the NYT and WaPo. (Many thanks to our friend JG for bringing this speech to our attention, in a day otherwise occupied by pitying the fool naive enough to take on Perfessor Chafetz in an argument....)

... This is a massive and difficult undertaking -- it is worth our effort, it is worth our sacrifice, because we know the stakes. The failure of Iraqi democracy would embolden terrorists around the world, increase dangers to the American people, and extinguish the hopes of millions in the region. ...
11 September 2001: crunch boom clatter argh.

07 October 2001: US and UK launch Operation Enduring Freedom and Operation Veritas.

March 2002: British military intelligence units informed that the decision to invade Iraq has already been taken.

24 September 2002: September Dossier published.

28 January 2003: Bush mentions attempts to buy uranium from Africa.

14 March 2003: IAEA finally gets hold of the relevant documents and says they're obvious fakes.

20 March 2003: invasion of Iraq.

July 2003: Bliar tells the Commons that those documents weren't the source of the info.

06 November 2003: that speech.

It's in the wrong place in the timeline. It comes after the invasion. That's not where the reason belongs.

...

blindthrall said:
This one is a little more out there, ... The height in the atmosphere that it becomes deadly is also where oxygen gets sparse, so the beam doesn't have anything to burn. When trained on a test plane, the pilot only reported feeling somewhat hot and itchy. But at the end of the beam, oxygen in the air burns in a disc-shaped ball of plasma.
Igniting oxygen is more than a little "out there".
 

Shaoken

New member
May 15, 2009
336
0
0
Jinx_Dragon said:
Given how many planes have exploded cause of explosives I would say 'dead giveaway' is a long shot at best. I have this idea because the people on those planes, using sat phones, SAID AS MUCH! We can argue if it was a threat of a bomb, or a real bomb, but that is a moot point as the possibility of there being a bomb has been raised as a red flag.
They were on a plane that just got hijacked. I can forgive them for not providing proof that the terrorists didn't have a bomb. But I must ask you WHY a bomb? What possible concieveable reason would there be to bring a bomb along? A 767 loaded with fuel is for all intents and purposes a missile, so what does the bomb do? The terrorists wouldn't be able to get ahold of one by themselves, providing one to them would only make them raise questions (although they might have been too high on zealous fury to care), and ultimately it wouldn't have added anything to the attack. The impact of the plane colliding with the towers destroyed multiple steel supports and the fuel started a fire which weakened the steel. A bomb might have destroyed more supports, but it wouldn't serve any real purpose but to attract more suspicion.

One that has not been adequately addressed! I do believe the government downplayed this for a simple reason, after 3000 people died heads would have to roll if such a massive breach of security was even investigated, the panic would be instant and people would demand action against those believed to be responcable for such a breach... even if there wasn't one.
Um, I think heads already rolled considering the gigantic clusterfuck that allowed 9/11 to happen in the first place. You're logic makes no sense considering that if such a possibility did exist that the government would investigate. I mean come on! If they didn't investigate and someone did get a bomb on a plane then it would destroy that entire administration. Simply put, I trust Bush and his government to do what's in their best interest, and that was to prevent any similar attacks from happening again.

So since you brought this up, how about you show some proof, any proof, that there may have been a bomb on any of the aircraft.

Box cutters though? Who could of suspected that, easily smuggled on and not really looked for prior to 9/11... good escape goat there.
You my friend are reality challenged. Box cutters make sense, because terrorists are all about improvisation. The nature of the 9/11 attacks is proof enough of that. Before that all hijackings ended with the plane on the ground and the passengers held for ransom. Using them as makeshift missiles was a brilliant (and deadly) act of ingunity.

24/7 war drills?
Not at NORAD, but war games are going on all year round. So it's not suspicious that one would happen to be going on during 9/11. And it's a moot point anyway since there's no evidence that the war games would have impacted their response (none of them where in the same area as the Twin Towers/Pentagon).

Source: http://911myths.com/html/war_games_cover_for_9-11.html

Red tape preventing any communications between organisations?
http://911myths.com/html/intercepts__norad_and_the_faa.html

A brilliant site which has already debunked all of your arguements, but here's a news article from that page;

Military Jets 7 Times as Busy as Before Sept. 11

H E R N D O N, Va., Aug. 13 ? The military sent fighter jets to chase suspicious aircraft 462 times between Sept. 11 and June, nearly seven times as often as the 67 scrambles from the same period a year earlier.

More frequent scrambles are also faster in the tense new environment because the North American Aerospace Defense Command communicates better with the Federal Aviation Administration.

On Sept. 11, flight controllers suspected around 8:25 a.m. ET that American Airlines Flight 11 from Boston's Logan Airport had been hijacked, but NORAD wasn't notified until 8:40 a.m. ? six minutes before the plane struck the World Trade Center in New York City.

Today, NORAD would know instantly of a suspected hijacking, officials said Monday.

"NORAD is now linked up telephonically 24 hours a day, seven days a week, so anything that's an anomaly or a suspected anomaly that's found in the system, NORAD knows about it as quickly as we do," said David Canoles, FAA's manager of air traffic evaluations and investigations.

At a NORAD operations center in Cheyenne Mountain in Colorado Springs, Colo., a noncommissioned officer listens to conversations on the FAA network from all over the United States, said Maj. Douglas Martin, NORAD spokesman.

"If he hears anything that indicates difficulty in the skies, we begin the staff work to scramble," Martin said. Before Sept. 11, the FAA had to telephone NORAD about any possible hijackings...
http://web.archive.org/web/20021017201218/http://abcnews.go.com/sections/us/DailyNews/homefront020813.html

So as you see, NORAD was not made aware of the hijacking until just before the first place crashed.

Some more required reading;

http://911myths.com/html/intercept_time.html

...hijacking is a law enforcement issue as is everything that takes off from within the United States. And only law enforcement can request assistance from the military, which they did, in this particular case. The route, if you follow the book, is that they go to the duty officer of the national military command center, who in turn makes an inquiry to NORAD for the availability of fighters, who then gets permission from someone representing the Sec. of Defense. Once that?s approved, then we scramble aircraft.
source: http://www.billstclair.com/911timeline/2003/noradtestimony052303.html

Wow...that sure sounds like red tape to me!

Super sonic jets unable to catch up with civilian passenger craft?
I direct you to the case of Payne Stewart. http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/national/daily/oct99/crash26.htm

the tl;dr version; it took 76 minutes from the FAA losing contact to these Super Sonic jets catching up to it. See the thing about Super Sonic Jets is...that they actually have to be specifically ordered to go super sonic. The reason why is because breaking the sound barrier causes a lot of wear and tear - that's why they aren't in use for civilian flights.

And again, all this is a moot point considering the fact that by the time the FAA told NORAD about the hijackings they were already minutes away from happening.

You can question my grasp of reality, but unlike you I've actually been providing sources and links and evidence.

And to further destroy your arguement;

On 9/11, Norad has 14 fighters on alert at seven sites in the continental United States
Source: http://www.9-11commission.gov/hearings/hearing12/eberhart_statement.pdf

14 planes...from all 48 mainland states. To spell it out for you, on alert means planes that are ready to take off at a moment's notice. Pretty damning, "but surely" you ask, "at least half of them would be in the New York and DC area! They could have shot the planes down!"

Norad was instrumental in getting fighter jets -- normally on 15-minute alert -- airborne within eight minutes.
Source: http://911research.wtc7.net/cache/planes/analysis/norad/calgaryherald101301_scrables.html

Eight minutes. Well that's not so bad....oh wait, NORAD only found out about the hijackings 6 minutes before the first impact. Unless one of those planes launched from a base right next to NYC there was no way they could get to the next plane and shoot it down without it raining fire and rubble all over the city.

A simple transponder being turned off eliminating all ability to track?
At some locations within the ATC en route environment, secondary-radar-only (no primary radar) gap filler radar systems are used to give lower altitude radar coverage between two larger radar systems, each of which provides both primary and secondary radar coverage. In those geographical areas served by secondary-radar only, aircraft without transponders cannot be provided with radar service. Additionally, transponder equipped aircraft cannot be provided with radar advisories concerning primary targets and weather.
FAA Aeronautical Information Manual
February 19, 2004
Source: http://www.airborneinternet.com/AI6.htm

Wow! Without a transponder, these jets would have disappeared whenever they entered secondary-rader areas! Well that's okay, all NORAD and the FAA has to do is find them when they come out the other side. It's not like there are dozens of flights in the air at any given moment, and spotting one is like finding needle going as fast as a speeding bullet while other, identicial flying needles are zipping around.

In this case the organization wasn't up to par because it had been crippled, and you want to ignore that reality by putting into doubt norads ability to do it's damn job.
It's "damn job" is to watch for incoming fighters attacking from outside the US' borders. They have a donut-like view; they ignore the mainland because there's no way in hell anyone is going to launch fight planes and bombers from within your own bloody borders! That'd make as much sense as having a traffic cop check the PD's parking lot.

Any other day it would of had jets in the air, parallel to any of those passenger planes, within half a hour... tops.
.

Bull. Fucking. Shit. They couldn't even do that AFTER 9/11;

7:59 p.m. Cessna enters "restricted" air space
8:03 p.m. FAA notifies NORAD
8:04 p.m. Cessna enters "prohibited" air space
8:06 p.m. Two F-16s get orders to scramble
8:06 p.m. Cessna passes White House "within a few miles"
8:17 p.m. F-16s take off from Andrews AFB. Intercept occurs "a few minutes later."

...Time to intercept would have been 55 minutes, if they hadn't been too late.
Source: http://reports.tbo.com/reports/bishop/ , http://reports.tbo.com/reports/bishop/

...another federal official said that two years ago [in 2002], military jets could identify and intercept only about 40 percent of intruders in training drills.
Source: http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A35440-2004Jul7_2.html

I'm not even going to waste time on it. Google can be your friend, use the damn thing. On reflection I take this back. With the amount of 9/11 bullshit floating around any google on norad is going to bounce you through years worth of 'chaff.' Google is not your friend when there is mind boggling amounts of matches to your quarry.
See the thing is, I have researched this. In depth. I know everything you said was bullshit because I had already researched it almost a year ago. And unlike you, I'm actually providing links and articles to expose your bullshit.

It deserves to be looked at closer and made sure all concidences are just that. The fact is NO ONE really did so.
Glad to see people like the NIST, Popular Mechanics, etc. etc. don't really exist in your world.

See, you, like a lot of the conspiracy nuts seem to think that the US government is one single, long and unbroken chain, of 'selected' people from a shadow puppet government that controls everything.
Strawman argument. Point out one sentance where I suggested that the government has one big, unbroken chain. But tell me this; how would this hypothetical CIA bigwig allowed 9/11 to happen if there wasn't a single, unbroken chain? Because the CIA has no control over NORAD or the FAA, and if they pull strings at airport security there would be a record of it, and said bigwig would wind up in front of a firing squad. Because aiding an enemy in attacking a military installation...is an act of treason. No way in hell could any one individual in the CIA even manage to help the hijackers without being caught. You'd need people at the top in every organisation involved to be in on this. And for your information the CIA and FBI dispise each other. That's why 9/11 happened; the two organisations could not co-operate to put together the pieces they had.

In any case I brought Northwood up to disprove one thing - The myth that the US government would not target it's own people. The documents existence means they ALREADY HAVE!
No, the documents existence means they considered the possibility. The fact that Northwood was rejected shows that the CIA actually has to run things past the President first. Because in order to pull this kind of stuff off, you need to use resources that will be missed by those who know of them.

Yet here you are trying to say that the documents existence is evidence no one will ever think that way again... bulllll shiiiiit!
No, the document's existence is evidence that nobody who values his career would try suggesting such a plan. And actually trying to execute it is an act of treason.

Its existence proves that there are have been people in the government, and likely are still, that will have no qualms about killing US citizens for 'the greater good.'
I believe that's apart of the concept behind "The Fifth Freedom" that Splinter Cell uses. Such a freedom is real, but whoever uses it can be held responsible for what they do.

But you can continue to live in your little, strange, reality where human nature doesn't exist and all governmental organizations are incompetent beyond belief.
No, I live in reality where thousands of small, isolated incidents can lead to one large, global event. Maybe you should leave your little reality and join in the real world.
 

Shaoken

New member
May 15, 2009
336
0
0
Jinx_Dragon said:
I may have taken a little more out on you then I should of, sorry about that.
Don't be. I'm snarky and an asshole. If someone could take me down a peg it would be a good thing.

1) Their view is over the whole if US airspace, from outside inwards. They have direct ties with radar stations, get live feed from all airports and anything else geared towards doing the job of defending the airspace of the north American region. They are a hub where information comes together and any threat is responded to, it is the sole job they have.

I find it hard to believe the military is that incompetent when it comes to defending US airspace and that is the core of your argument. Do you really believe the US military, with one of the most technical air forces in the world, is that useless?
Okay, think about this. What was the likelyhood that they expected someone to hijack a plane and ram it into a building? That had never happened before in the history of the world, so cut them some slack. And again;

On Sept. 11, flight controllers suspected around 8:25 a.m. ET that American Airlines Flight 11 from Boston's Logan Airport had been hijacked, but NORAD wasn't notified until 8:40 a.m. - six minutes before the plane struck the World Trade Center in New York City.
There's undeniable proof that NORAD wasn't even informed by the FAA that something was up until 6 minutes before the first impact. 6 minutes. Why would they rush to scramble fighters instantly when they had no idea what was going on? First they have to verify the situation, identify what's going on and them allocate resources. They can't be expected to, the very second they hear the news, go "Okay, scramble jets from here, here and here and go find these planes." You're giving NORAD no time to digest the information, confirm it, talk about likely situations and discussions about what resources they have on hand. Like I said last post, there were 14 fighter jets on alert on the mainland at the time. That's 14 jets spread out across the whole country.


This isn't your real thoughts is it, cause even that one I can't fathom... that all they do is sit around and play 'war games.'
I can tell you that they don't do that. I can also tell you that they don't spend their days planning against hijacked planes being turned into missiles before 9/11.

Though, if this is true, irony is defiantly with a sense of humor... one of those 'war games' was the very thing you say Norad is bad at doing, intercepting aircraft that have been hijacked.
That's been claimed, but like your last post said these were top secret wargames. Nobody can even confirm what they were about. Sure it's been claimed that some of them do deal with these incidents, but even if it's true such an event wasn't taking place in that area of the US, so it's a moot point.

3) You have ignored all procedures here. The moment the transponder went offline it is to be taken as a hijacking until other wise proven.
Prove it.

We could argue that, this time, it wasn't done by the book but that takes a massive leap of faith to assume that multiple airports all dropped the ball at the same time during such a worse attack is a bit far fetched.
Let me direct you to the previous article;

H E R N D O N, Va., Aug. 13 ? The military sent fighter jets to chase suspicious aircraft 462 times between Sept. 11 and June, nearly seven times as often as the 67 scrambles from the same period a year earlier.

More frequent scrambles are also faster in the tense new environment because the North American Aerospace Defense Command communicates better with the Federal Aviation Administration.

On Sept. 11, flight controllers suspected around 8:25 a.m. ET that American Airlines Flight 11 from Boston's Logan Airport had been hijacked, but NORAD wasn't notified until 8:40 a.m. ? six minutes before the plane struck the World Trade Center in New York City.

Today, NORAD would know instantly of a suspected hijacking, officials said Monday.
Again, this is proof that what you're claiming is feasable. Unless you can show me pre-9/11 examples where the transmitter being turned off resulted in NORAD being instantly notified and scrambling jets. Because in the only example that took place over US soil it took 19 minutes for NORAD to be made aware that the plane wasn't responding, and 76 minutes for an intercept to occur. And said intercept only happened because NORAD got lucky and already had planes in the air.

Now let's look at the time it took from the planes being hijacked till the moment the crashed;

Flight 11 (8:14 to 8:47 - 33 minutes), Flight 175 (8:42 to 9:04 - 22 minutes), Flight 77 (8:51 to 9:38 - 47 minutes), Flight 93 (9:27 to 10:04 - 37 minutes)

If it took 76 minutes for them to intercept Payne Stewart's plane, how could they be expected to catch up to these planes when the longest one in flight was number 77 for 47 minutes?

If procedures where followed it would of taken minutes for the people at the top of the ladder, you know one of those rungs being Norad, to have a picture of what was happening.
On Sept. 11, flight controllers suspected around 8:25 a.m. ET that American Airlines Flight 11 from Boston's Logan Airport had been hijacked, but NORAD wasn't notified until 8:40 a.m. ? six minutes before the plane struck the World Trade Center in New York City.
It took 15 minutes for NORAD to be nodified.

The reason no picture was forth coming wasn't some imagined red tape. It was because those higher up rungs where already dealing with dozens of other hijacking situations.
Oh, now whose accusing NORAD of being incompetent? You honestly think that when the head of the FAA calls and says there has been a hijacking that they would assume it was apart of the games?

None of which where real, of course, but the real ones got lost in the fake and the whole system was slowed down just trying to get the message of a real hijacking through the 'war games.'
Let's look at these hijacking war games;

http://911myths.com/html/operation_vigilant_guardian.html

An hour into his shift, something unscripted happens. NORAD's Northeast Air Defence Sector (NEADS), based in Rome, N.Y., contacts the mountain.

The Federal Aviation Administration has evidence of a hijacking and is asking for NORAD support. This is not part of the exercise.

In a flash, Operation Northern Vigilance is called off. Any simulated information, what's known as an "inject," is purged from the screens.
http://www.911readingroom.org/bib/whole_document.php?article_id=92
So once again, the facts destroy your arguement. It took them an instant to verify that this was not apart of the excericse and pull the plug, which instantly removed the war game. So in fact said war game was a completely moot point in their response time because they knew practically instantly that it was bogus, and called the operation off.

3) I think you have fallen into a 'splitting hairs' situation here. There has been only one interception if you choose only to count planes that where intercepted over US soil, and not say out to sea for example.
That's a pretty big hair. See, over sea there's a lot less aircraft, making it easier to track them down. And like I've said, NORAD focuses on threats outside of the US, so to compare intercepts over sea

Hijacked planes are not that common and when they normally happen the hijackers tend to be more South American in decent then Middle Eastern, turning the planes down into the gulf from the coastal cities normally targeted. But it is a good hair splitting technique if you want to spread misinformation about how relevant Norad is in a hijack situation.
I did nothing of the sort. I simply stated that NORAD can't track down planes that the FAA doesn't tell them about.

The slow response times here is because they launched the craft from to far away, they do have planes ready to launch in minutes and many bases where closer. But when you have dozens of dots as 'potential hijacked planes' it is a little difficult to know which base would get the best results. Yes these planes never would of made it, but it wasn't cause they couldn't of. It was cause they didn't know which dot was real and which was simulation and made the wrong call.
See my last source. NORAD quickly turned off the simulation, so they wouldn't be chasing simulation planes. The problem was that the FAA couldn't identify which planes were the hijacked one because of the lack of transmitters.

Norads failure always comes back to that 'war game' and the fact it was running. I once more state: What is the probability of a terrorist attack involving aircrafts happening while a top secret 'war game' was underway?

Probably on par of winning the lottery on your very first ever ticket.
Well first of all, what are the odds of a terrorist attack happening in the US period?

Close to zero.

Now, what are the odds that on any date of the year, somewhere the US is running a war game?

Quite high.

What are the odds that NORAD at any particular point in time?

Not so great. Of course what was the odds that while King Phillip of France was riding his horse, a pig would dart out, trip the horse over and kill him, leading to his brother Louis VII becoming King after spending his life preparing for the Monoastry, which resulted in his wife Eleanor of Aquitaine divorcing him because of how much he sucked in bed, to marry the King of England Henry II, and eventually give birth to King John who sucked at being king so much that he pretty much was forced into signing the Magna Carta which became the basis of democracy?

Very fucking unlikely. And yet, this completely random sequence of events (plus a crusade thrown in their somewhere) completely and utterly changed the course of history. All because a pig ran out in front of a horse that just so happened to be carrying a king.


Listen, the facts here completely destroy your arguement. Just take a look at 911myths.com . The guy who made it went around, took almost every credible theory out there and debunked them WITH sources. I didn't know about the specific war games, but I just looked it up, followed his sources and pretty much saw that what you're suggesting was wrong. I mean honestly, you don't think nobody in the military has ever considered the remote possibility that during a war game the real thing might happen and they'll need to get ready in an instant? Just five seconds ago you were arguing about how well prepared they are.

Anyway, in future let's use the number points system, it makes it easier to work out these replies.
 

Azraellod

New member
Dec 23, 2008
4,375
0
0
Ok, I have two.

-The royal family is secretly a race of shape-shifting alien reptiles that rule the world.

-The early middle ages never occurred, and the king that supposedly ruled during that time was fictional.
 

TheGreatCoolEnergy

New member
Aug 30, 2009
2,581
0
0
Valate said:
Woem said:
The moon landing being a hoax. Seriously, that one gets me every time.
Actually, it wasn't... I know people who were in the photography/film industry back then, and they confirmed that there was some un-fake-able stuff for the level of technology.
But you gotta remember, back in the 80's the government had discovered how to fuckin time travel (if you believe in conspiracy theories), so i'm pretty shure they would have mastered photoshop.
 

TheGreatCoolEnergy

New member
Aug 30, 2009
2,581
0
0
My personnal favourites(at the moment):
-Lizard people
-"Greys"
-Hollow Earth
-Princess Diana was killed as a satanic ritual
-The moon doesn't exist
-The moon landing didn't happen
-Illuminati
to name a few

Also: this is a conspiracy that just occured to me: Communism is so highly surpressed in the western(and arguably strongest) parts of the world because the illuminati know that if a communist/socialist regime were to be initiated, all their wealth(as they are the head of capitalist society) would dry up. Without wealth they wouldn't be able to buy off the politicians, and they would lose control of the government and therefor the power. That is why communistic/socialist ideas are so quickly surpressed in America, and why they are so eager to promote capitalism.

Not bad for comming off the top of my ehad eh?
 

Mardy

New member
Apr 7, 2009
448
0
0
Hitler lives in the middle of the Earth, and Obama is actually John F Kenndey's brain.
 

Canid117

New member
Oct 6, 2009
4,075
0
0
Anyone ever heard the AIDs conspiracy? Supposedly the U.S. government created AIDs to kill gays and black people...

Really? Conspiracy theorists? Have you no shame?

*remembers Loose Change*

Oh yeah you don't.
Silly me!
 

TheGreatCoolEnergy

New member
Aug 30, 2009
2,581
0
0
Hmm I was just thinking about the hollow earth theory, and I thought "If there was an advanced race living beneath our feet, why wouldn't they have came up and killed us already?" then I thought "Gears of War." Anyone else see this connection?
 

Ashtovo

New member
Jul 25, 2009
184
0
0
MattRooney06 said:
FalloutJack said:
The craziest conspiracy ever? Simple. It's the one where they accuse me of trying to take over the world. Isn't that just nuts?

*Shoves plans and artillery out of sight*
shoves plans AND ARTILLERY out of site......if you can shove artillery around i dont think you need it.....you could probably just crush us with your biceps
no don't tell him that. now we are all screwed. thanks.
 

Shaoken

New member
May 15, 2009
336
0
0
Lonely Swordsman said:
Women actually came to earth around 2000 BC in ancient Greece to enslave men and take over the world.
...so how did people reproduce back then?
 

Xojins

New member
Jan 7, 2008
1,538
0
0
I heard one about Helen Keller being a conspiracy and that she never actually existed.

Also the whole Amelia Earhart conspiracy.