Critics Ruin Video Games? ?Good!

[DoPo]

@ Judgegame

The woman in the trailer wasn't a hooker or a sex bot. She wasn't half naked. She didn't get executed.

All of the things that make that trailer sexist in your eyes were not actually present. You are mistaken. No amount of argumentative chaff is going to disguise the fact that you saw a pretty woman in a video game trailer and assumed she was a hooker.

Yeah that was me because I ran with the word Sexbot from your original link. But it doesn't really matter either way to be honest. The problem is you refusing to acknowledge that the video shows her being executed for going on a knife wielding killing rampage in order to press your idea that you she was killed for being a hooker.

OP's thought process:
*sees a random person on the internet call here a hooker* OK, so she's a hooker and she is executed, there fore she is executed for being one.
*sees a random person on the internet saying she killed people* No, that must be wrong because she's being executed for being a hooker.
*sees evidence for her killing people* No, that must be there only to justify killing a hooker
*somebody says she is not a hooker* Well, I never SAID she was.

 

[Zykon TheLich_v1legacy]

I think they are just a refluffed version of the Wolvers from the core book.

"The longest and deadliest of the implant blades, wolvers are implanted along the back of the hand. When the hand is clenched in a fist (in this case her hands look like they could have been clenched, or just pointed at a downward angle) the thin, triangular foot long blade telescopes out and locks into place, remaining extended a full foot until the hand is relaxed."

The BigRipp was 14", so bleh to your mere 1'. Blade is plural (i.e. it is "blades" in the MRB), although that could be referring to both hands. Also, it may not have said so specifically in the book but wolvers came in 3s in the artwork, hence "wolvers" from wolverine. To my mind the BigRipp is closer. Doesn't mean that that was what was on their mind, could be they were thinking wolvers, but I still think that of existing CP2020 cyberware, the BigRipp is closer to what we see there.

 

[fwiffo]

*happily playing faster than light*

*stops by the escapist and reads:

"Maybe you as a gamer don?t want to think about what you consume and what it does to the community. Maybe you are comfortably ignorant. Maybe you want games to be predominantly sexist, but just don?t want people to ***** about it. Maybe you want to go to conventions and shamelessly stare at booth babe asses and take photos of their tits without having to go through the motions of asking her first. Maybe you want games to go all out with the girlfriend memes, because you have a girlfriend and the jokes about her make her know her place. And maybe you enjoy that XBOX Live is a place where you can ask female players to suck your dick without feeling out of place. Boys will be boys, right? And where when not in games culture can we be boys and not feel ashamed for it, right? Right, fellas?"

*goes back to playing faster than light*

 

[Zykon TheLich_v1legacy]

The BigRipp is a honking chainsaw attached at the wrist though, and doesnt look concealable in its art work... Could be though! Or it could be a totally new system that they are working with.

But the reason I said Wolvers is because they are the right length, had the proper mechanism (IE poping out of the wrist), and I did mention that they were likely re-fluffed, which CP2020 never really had a big problem with I think considering its big ideal is style style style.

No it's not. You're thinking of the Husqvarna chainrip.

BigRipp does the same, it's just a sinlge blade that can also come out of the forearm. Do I have to post a scan?

 

[Zykon TheLich_v1legacy]

Whoops!

You are correct I was thinking of the Husqvarna!

Could you tell me where to find the BigRipp though? I cant seem to find it in my books annoyingly enough. ~.~

Chromebook 4, page 11, top half above the palm bomb.

EDIT: actually, that scan's probably copyright infringement, ill PM a link if you need it.

 

[Phuctifyno]

Well, I'll agree that the Cyberpunk 2077 trailer is being misjudged (or misused), seeing as there's no indication in the trailer of the woman being a hooker

its funny the person doing accusations of sexism is the one who (mistakenly) automatically assumes "hooker"

If you're lookin' for hookers, you'll find 'em everywhere... as my mom used to say.

 

[Adam Hilton]

What was cyberpunk 2077 portraying? I'm sorry, I don't get the damn trailer at all. The premise seems to be "people are getting a lot of implants, people with implants want to kill the meatbags, men in combat gear shooting half naked lady with impractical looking blades coming out of her arms and massive honking tits. Oh and her skin is bulletproof apparently." I'm sorry but what the flying fuck was going on in that trailer? Why did she have to be half naked? Why did she need the F cup? I don't get why that trailer got everyone so hyped for the game, it couldn't turn me off faster.

1. Those with implants don't just want to kill 'meatbags' as you call them, they simply have them to better themselves for whatever personal reasons, but overdoing implanting causes a loss of humanity. The squad of police who drop down an capture the woman with the 'impractical blades' (which seem fairly useful to me) are made up of 'Psycho's' those serial implantors who have been driven to lose their humanity. It shows ALOT, and leaves a room for fun speculation based around pre-released info.

2. It was portraying that the inhabitants of the city are obsessed with implanting. (implants aren't just there to use as weapons or enhance vision etc) The fact that almost every one in this trailer looks so attractive is due to the inhabitants changing how they look- the breast implants and beautiful looks that fit with common view of 'attractiveness.'


sure it may seem uneccesary but the trailer (excluding the music ) showed alot of good room for development and you have to remember that the developer has to draw people in- not much else draws people in like a beautiful woman with ridiculous implants xD

 

[Zykon TheLich_v1legacy]

nah no need to worry, I found it in my book, I also looked in Interface and yeah, the weapon she has is definitely a BigRipp, nice catch

I wasn't saying it was definitely a BigRipp, just that that was the closest fit in CP2020, although having just had a look at the interface version the blades look incredibly similar, it doesn't take much work to add a fancy custom telescoping spring version to cyberarm and you have pretty much exactly what is in the movie.

 

[Dr. Cakey]

*happily playing faster than light*

*stops by the escapist and reads:

"Maybe you as a gamer don?t want to think about what you consume and what it does to the community. Maybe you are comfortably ignorant. Maybe you want games to be predominantly sexist, but just don?t want people to ***** about it. Maybe you want to go to conventions and shamelessly stare at booth babe asses and take photos of their tits without having to go through the motions of asking her first. Maybe you want games to go all out with the girlfriend memes, because you have a girlfriend and the jokes about her make her know her place. And maybe you enjoy that XBOX Live is a place where you can ask female players to suck your dick without feeling out of place. Boys will be boys, right? And where when not in games culture can we be boys and not feel ashamed for it, right? Right, fellas?"

*goes back to playing faster than light*

No! No! First rule of the internet: "Feed the trolls. They are hungry."

 

[Moonlight Butterfly]

Criticism is good because it helps people to improve.

Also I wish people would learn that if something is pointed out as being sexist no one is saying you are sexist for enjoying it.

I think this is part of the reason some guys fly off the handle if anyone dares to suggest a video game might be sexist when it's not actually implied.

Pretty sure that when I read Enid Blyton books when I was little I wasn't a huge racist, for example and yet I can still acknowledge the racism in those books.

That said we should look long and hard about the fact that people were more outraged about Sarkeesian airing her opinion than some senator saying videogames cause gun violence.

 

[Lovely Mixture]

snip

Yes, this is bad and is worthy of criticism, but is a review of a videogame, does it mean that videogame culture is inherently sexist? No. Does it mean that sex appeal just might be getting out of hand? Yes.

Long Wall of Text

I agree with every word in that wall. It seems the escapist in particular is a hive for liberal douchebags trying to find some ground with which to push their agendas... though I admit I don't really go to other videogame "news" sites so I have no idea if its as bad elsewhere.

Neogaf comes to mind.

I can vouch for this, my friend has reported similar experiences over there.

Criticism is good because it helps people to improve.

Also I wish people would learn that if something is pointed out as being sexist no one is saying you are sexist for enjoying it.

Yes I can agree with this, criticism is good. It is especially good when the object of criticism has been researched and analyzed. Accepting criticism is important as well.

That said we should look long and hard about the fact that people were more outraged about Sarkeesian airing her opinion than some senator saying videogames cause gun violence.

Yes, SOME people were (the dumb misogynistic vocal gamers). But others like me, weren't outraged, just critical because Anita is not a good critic.

I'll clarify: A feminist (male or female) making a project to analyze media is fine by me. A feminist (male or female) asking for money to do a project that she hasn't been doing well in the first place is irritating but acceptable to me, but don't think I'm some chauvinist pig when I criticize her.

 

[Moonlight Butterfly]

snip

I'm okay with people calling Sarkeesian useless. It's when they deny there is a problem to be looked at, at all, that I roll my eyes and sigh.

 

[Lovely Mixture]

snip

I'm okay with people calling Sarkeesian useless. It's when they deny there is a problem to be looked at, at all that I roll my eyes and sigh.

Ok, I can understand that. That does sound like incorrigible behavior.

 

[Godhead]

-snip-.

Hey. Hey you. Yeah, stop using logic.

OT: Looking at just the trailer and taking it at just face value and make inferences with the things that I am shown. There's some woman that just got shot by a bullet in the cheek and it shattered on impact while her cheek remained unharmed, maybe she's a robot or something. The camera changes to a man wearing what appears to be riot gear and holding an assaul rifle that says police on it and he fires off a round, he must have been shooting at the woman. As the bullet travels you see blood on the ground and a lone high heel that's colored red. Maybe there was a murder here, did the woman do it? There are also more bullets in the air at different locations, there must be more policemen. We then see the woman kneeling on the ground with scythes coming out of here forearms and she's covered in blood with bodies strewn around her. She must have killed those people. We then go to a bird eye's view and see the scene from above with a voice claiming that 14 people were killed and 4 others were seriously injured. Holy shit did she do all that? Then a guy appears behind her with a gun held to her head with a police badge and is dressed differently from the other police, maybe he deals with these things exclusively. Then we see the trigger starting to be pulled, so she will probably die from something that close. Finally we see a woman in an indoor area and she's slightly jostling and there are lights moving in the background so she's probably in a car or a truck. She also has the same scar thing on her cheek as the woman who killed people, is she the same person? And the special police is there too, then she puts on the weird helmet that the other guy is also wearing.

If I'm able to gain all of that from just watching the trailer and then pausing it, writing it down here, and then unpausing it and repeating all that. I'm pretty sure that they were able to portray the trailer pretty damn well. There's a woman, it's revealed that she's covered in blood with scythes coming out her fucking arms and there's a report saying that there were 14 dead and that the police have a suspect while they have a top down look at her and the bodies laying around her. I think she might have killed some people guys.

 

[OuroborosChoked]

I'm not sure I even want to get involved in this disaster of a thread, but here goes anyway:

The trailer isn't an advertisement.

It's an announcement trailer.

Cyberpunk 2020 is a tabletop RPG that has been VERY popular in Poland. CD Projekt RED is a Polish company. They wanted to announce the fact that they're working on a game in that setting and get people to pay attention to any future updates that may be coming. It's essentially saying, "Like Cyberpunk? We're doing a Cyberpunk game. Stay tuned".

That's it. End of story.

It's not selling you on the game, as it's not even close to being finished yet. Claiming that the trailer "failed" because it doesn't sell you on the product is YOUR mistake, not the trailer's shortcoming.

Oh, and Cowboy Bebop isn't cyberpunk. Neither is Doctor Who. That's just sci-fi. Personally, I find it a stretch to lump Serial Experiments: Lain in with cyberpunk, too. Cyber, yes... but it lacks the "punk" aesthetic. It may have been inspired by cyberpunk, but it's not really cyberPUNK, per se. And I'm a HUGE fan of SE:L.

Whoever said that CB and DW are cyberpunk really doesn't understand the genre...