Sorry, but you're acting like an *insert whatever you want here*. The issue isn't that PC gamers have a sense of self entitlement for what they think Crysis 2 should be, but that Crytek has repeatedly stated, in the past and all throughout the last year that Crysis couldn't really be done on a console and later that the Crysis 2 PC version would be outstanding and deliver well on any expectations and then some.Archangel357 said:You spent $600 on your "monster" (big deal, I spent ?1,000 on my PC), and now desperately need to justify your purchase.
This is not the case. The game may be optimized, but it is solid evidence of Crytek's failure to deliver on the dozens of promises they made to their PC fanbase.
The big issue isn't the game itself, but the fact that we were lied to and told the game was going to be something it isn't.
No one is disputing whether or not the game is good, but what people are disputing is how good it COULD have been.
Again though, since it is a good game and optimized, I think PC gamers as a whole should forgive Crytek, even though they've lied almost every step of the way, and wait for Crysis 3 to see if Crytek has just lost focus and decided to dumb down their game in favour of console money.
Edit: How about a better comparison? What if president x in *insert country here* were to say that in 4 years time, he would totally fix all issues and improve the economy. 4 years later, the economy runs a little better, but many of the issues are still there and where some have disappeared, new ones have popped up in their place. Most importantly, there has been almost zero progress since 4 years ago. Those who have benefitted call those disatisfied whiners, while those disatisfied aruge that within those 4 years, all those promises made should have amounted to at least some significant progress.