TypeSD said:
soulfire130 said:
TypeSD said:
Aqua Trenoble said:
TypeSD said:
Aqua Trenoble said:
Oh that's right, I forgot that spiritual and paranormal forces don't exist and have never done anything. Must suck to live in your world...
Same world you live in. Until the spiritual and paranormal can actually be explained in rational, structured experiments, and "psychic ability" can be replicated, it's all hokum.
Arguably we all live within our own personal worlds with their own events and rules, but I digress.
If you refuse to accept even the possibility that there's more than science and logic then you're missing out on some really rad shit. That's all I meant.
I fail to see why you feel the need for there to BE anything else. Isn't the physical universe enough without, let's not pull any punches, fairy stories?
I fail to see how you can say that because there is no evidence means that its 'hokum'. It was once though that the world was flat even though it was acually round.
Ok let me put it this way.
Prove it.
Any of it.
Prove to me that anything you care to describe as "supernatural" actually exists. Write out an experiment.
The world was proven round.
I'm waiting on something to be "proven" paranormal.
I am timing you.
1. Damn that was a quick response. Where you waiting for someone to pull that response on?
2. Are you mad?(seriously asking)
3.Timing me? I didn't know that there was a time limit to proving something.(-_-

Also, I type slow so expect a long wait time.
4. My point was that you can't something can't be because of lack of evidence. Although technically, there is 'viable' video and audio of spirits or 'ghost' if you will, its just not being accepted was evidence because people are afraid everything is faked. Which brings me to-
5. I think no matter what bring to you, you will reject it as fake. Let's say I brought to you a resent video of a full apperition, you likely say it photoshoped or a person in get-up. if brought audeo you would say its a person I had say something. Even if I showed you video of it just sitting on the table and In an empty room, you'll say I tampered with the audeo. This in turn would render any expirement useless and pointless. Besides, I'm a stranger on the internet, you not gonna believe me with or without evidence.
6. So instead of me wasting my time giving you evidence you'll reject instintly, why don't you get you evidence for you? Acually goto a place that the owner/s and patrins say is haunted and has a lot of activity. And to be Thorough go investigate there more than one time.
7. counter-argument: YOU'RE the one saying there is such a thing a the supernature! I don't need to collect evidence for you!
This is true, I'll admit. But if you don't, we'll be stuck at square 1 with nothing but words.
Which is fine with me either way.
Well, whatever you do, it was enteraining arguing with you.