I don't really see how what I said conflicts with what you're saying. I never went into the whys and wherefores of sexism against either genders in video games, I just pointed out that a female character with no defining features other than her looks is merely eye candy (as the portrayal of females was the topic of discussion). That could be sexist but so could very well a highly machismo male character such as that of Duke Nukem. The difference, as you allude to, is that sexism against males isn't highlighted nearly as much as sexism against females in not just video games but the wider media and entertainment based worlds in general. In fact I'd go further and say the very word 'sexism' and all it denotes is clearly most strongly associated with sexism against females and the feminist movement. That's probably for a multitude of historical and cultural reasons but the fact is how we portray females in various outlets is given far more attention than how we portray males. Maybe that's just because we males are just less sensitive about our image than the fairer sex oh wait that's probably sexist, naughty me.....Sean Deli said:You see, this is a problem I have with these arguements: it applied, applies and will always apply to both genders.YodaUnleashed said:There's nothing wrong with being attractive or indeed portraying your female character as attractive, but when that's her only defining feature you haven't created a very compelling or sophisticated character, she's merely eye candy.
When you have completely uninteresting in all regards male protagonist - people go "meh, this game sucks - the characters are dull".
When you have smoking hot - but completely uninteresting in all other regards - female character (God forbid - a protagonist) - you hear "sexist!"
No, you are wrong! The correct answer should be - AGAIN - "meh, this game sucks - the characters are dull"
You have armies of video-game unsavvy feminists fighting with basement dwelling neckbeards over why making a brain-dead / smoking hot female character is sexist. Or alternatively over why not having a multi-layered ethnic character is racist. Words like "white male privilege" are thrown over.
And than, in the dark and damp corner. Completely alone. You have brave guys like Extra Credits crew, who say "Maybe video-game industry should concentrate on making better characters. Like characters of ANY race or gender. Because actually, the ones we have right now very often suck. Please? Pretty please?"
Video games companies actually listen to the noise that the gamosphere produces. And results of the outcry like this one would not be better characters - they would be asexual female characters. But just as braindead as they are now.
I do agree, better characters all round regardless of sex, race or even religion should be the focus, but I still think this developer fella should'?t be dragging his culture down with him as a defence for what is undeniably a poor and holistically lacking portrayal of a female character.