You never provided an actual specific link to the material you were drawing your information from, but not to worry as I went out of my way to track it down.[footnote]www.ace.lu.se/images/Syd_och_sydostasienstudier/working_papers/shibata_final.pdf[/footnote] But lets get down to business.
Criminals often not only externalize the blame for their crimes, but will often on advice from their defense team say anything that they would need to say in the pursuit of judicial leeway. Given the reputation of the Japanese Criminal Justice System and their high rates of criminal conviction when cases are brought to trial, then there is a very real likelihood that blaming the pornography is little more than a commonly laundered sob story.
"It wasn't me Officer-San! The porn held me down and made me!" Yeah, right.
No mention is given, whether in detail or in passing, of the individual circumstances of the 553 individuals involved in the sample as it is presented. We don't even learn the trends in their pornography consumption.
In short, it is impossible to objectively determine whether or not the pornography they consumed was actually responsible for their actions.
Truly, a great leap forward for science!
And if you don't understand how controlled studies conducted in this manner when combined with a heightened politicized atmosphere concerning the nature of the research being conducted can lead to inherent bias and bad science, then well, I'm not going to waste time trying to teach you to be honest.
But hey, so far, so good, so what the fuck has this got to do with objectification of women in video games?
You are the one who has attempted to establish a link between fictional portrayals of rape in Japanese pornography and a game franchise most renown for its fictional portrayals of female beach volley ball.
Do you at least recognise that there is measurable difference between media that trivializes sexual assault as presented the evidence that you yourself brought forward, and the DOA franchise?
Or are you another idiot who thinks allroads rape lead to Rome rape?
This is hardly news.Moonlight Butterfly said:I provided a link between sexually objectifying material and sexual assault in my original link. A researcher found that 49% of those men who admitted their crime to officers said they had watch sexually objectifying material beforehand and it contributed to their offense.
Criminals often not only externalize the blame for their crimes, but will often on advice from their defense team say anything that they would need to say in the pursuit of judicial leeway. Given the reputation of the Japanese Criminal Justice System and their high rates of criminal conviction when cases are brought to trial, then there is a very real likelihood that blaming the pornography is little more than a commonly laundered sob story.
"It wasn't me Officer-San! The porn held me down and made me!" Yeah, right.
No mention is given, whether in detail or in passing, of the individual circumstances of the 553 individuals involved in the sample as it is presented. We don't even learn the trends in their pornography consumption.
In short, it is impossible to objectively determine whether or not the pornography they consumed was actually responsible for their actions.
Yeah, what she really said was this.Moonlight Butterfly said:While that doesn't show that it's the main factor it does show that it's a factor. The same researcher quotes a study that was on Japanese university age men showing them different types of porn. Those that were shown the aggressive 'faked' non consensual sex showed tendencies towards saying rape is okay and 'the woman likes it anyway' when questioned straight afterwards.
The synopsis of the study I will post below..Tomo Shibata said:K. Ohbuchi, T. Ikeda and G Takeuchi exposed 72 "normal" male students
at Tohoku University in Japan to either a "positive" rape film in which a
female victim expressed pleasure, a negative rape film in which she expressed
pain, or a consenting sex film (all of these three expose the sexual parts of the
female body as "enticing flesh"). Both rape proclivity and belief in rape
myths were generated among these normal males students after the exposure,
and most significantly among those who viewed a "positive" rape film.
So they took a group of 75 men. Then exposed them to a fictionalized depiction of a woman being physically coerced, and here I am assuming the depiction was of physical coercion, into sex against her will. An encounter that she is depicted as ultimately *Ew* enjoying *Ew*, and then gave these same men a survey to complete afterwards as to try and gauge and measure their experiences. And the best they could come up with is that men exposed to such material are more likely to believe that women enjoy sexual coercion or will falsely accuse a man of rape, but that these effects depend on the views on rape they held prior to exposure.Ohbuchi said:Researchers found that the men whose movie showed women enjoying rape were more likely to believe that women like to be raped or that they make up rape cases than the men whose movie showed women reacting negatively. However, these effects also depend on men's views concerning rape in general.[footnote]http://cmch.tv/mentors/fullRecord.asp?id=2374[/footnote]
Truly, a great leap forward for science!
And if you don't understand how controlled studies conducted in this manner when combined with a heightened politicized atmosphere concerning the nature of the research being conducted can lead to inherent bias and bad science, then well, I'm not going to waste time trying to teach you to be honest.
But hey, so far, so good, so what the fuck has this got to do with objectification of women in video games?
You are the one who has attempted to establish a link between fictional portrayals of rape in Japanese pornography and a game franchise most renown for its fictional portrayals of female beach volley ball.
Do you at least recognise that there is measurable difference between media that trivializes sexual assault as presented the evidence that you yourself brought forward, and the DOA franchise?
Or are you another idiot who thinks all