I merely meant that he probably spent more time mentioning the boobs in the review than they actually were on screen in the film. It's an entirely irrelevant aspect of the movie and to use the addition of ladies chesticles as an indicator of quality says more about the reviewer than the film.Gorfias said:I can't agree. I think the reason I was so taken back by his take on Expendables is he is often spot on with his reviews. IE, It was because of him I bothered with Daybreakers and District 9 and really enjoyed them. So far, I have passed on "9" when he said it was Meh.Nerf Ninja said:Except that's pretty much all he seems to focus on in his reviews...Gorfias said:But, especially in this day of Internet boobs, Bob would agree (as he noted sort of in his Heavy Metal review) that nudity alone is not going to put butts in seats. I can see more surfing in 5 minutes for free than I will at something like this. But, it is typically a nice bonus to a movie I want to see anyway.
Even in this review, he drops the names of some older movies which I immediately added to Netflix (Dog Soldiers and Doomsday).
I regret you do not get as much out of him.
Daybreakers and District 9 are both excellent films, yeah 9 can be a bit meh but it's ok for a dark kids film, and I think you'll love both Dog Soldiers and Doomsday too. Although Dog Soldiers has a hilariously bad matrix pun in it.
I'm off to watch his reviews of District 9 and Daybreakers now as I missed those and I'm interested in hearing his views.