Ever get the feeling that your country is run by idiots?

Recommended Videos

Atmos Duality

New member
Mar 3, 2010
8,473
0
0
Plurralbles said:
Anti intellectualism is rampant in the US. If you appear intelligent, "FUCK YOU!" Says everyone. Then they elect the dumbass and then cry about that. The Tea Party is the loudest most full of shit movement I've ever seen. They pull in everyone who just need to make noise and have no validity. Their only strategy is to scare ignorant morons into voting for them.
Welcome to every political party, ever.
Every party is started by the Elite to lead some Sheep.

OT: On the constituent/media side, I'm incredibly tired of people blaming the President and only him.
Last I checked, there were two major political parties in direct conflict over in Congress, not just one man who runs everything.

Remember: Congress is the one who holds the purse in America.
Congress approved the requested military expenditures for Iraq and Afghanistan. Congress could have, at any time, overturned Obama's massive bailout plan.

Obama might be a scary idiot and a liar (not that different from his predecessor all-told), but pinning all the blame on him is being dangerously ignorant. He becomes a Pariah for the real problems; a strawman dummy you can burn in place of all the other crooks who pull this shit.

So no, I'm not defending Obama, but it just drives me nuts when the first thing out of some asshole's mouth is "OBAMA IS THE NEXT HITLER! HE'S KILLING THE COUNTRY! IT'S ALL HIS FAULT! I DIDN'T VOTE FOR HIM!" (and if you think I'm kidding about the Hitler comparison, I saw a bunch of yokels in my own town last month protesting his presidency. They had signs saying he was the next Hitler.)
 

dragonslayer32

New member
Jan 11, 2010
1,663
0
0
Talshere said:
dragonslayer32 said:
Talshere said:
dragonslayer32 said:
Talshere said:
A Labor Goverment was the worst thing that ever happened to the UK. When they gained power with Blair way back when the UK was in the black, 12 years on the joint party government is cutting back on EVERYTHING just to stop going further into the red and we have a 130 billion debt to clear. I dont care how much people like having benefits for not having a job, because of some minor ailment noone will ever notice etc, it all needs scraping because we simply cant afford it.
'ALL'? Are you serious? My father served 15 years in the navy until he couldn't work anymore because of a condition which causes his joints to seize up. Are you saying that he shouldn't get any money from the country he protected for 15 years? So we can't afford to help people like my dad, but the tax payer CAN afford to pay for David Cameron's 3 houses and staff?

Im pretty sure that doesnt come under the heading of benefits because you cant be bothered to work or ailments that nobody will ever notice.

Let me be more specific. ADHD didnt exist till what. 30 years ago? That doesnt mean it didnt exist. The same number of people "suffered" exactly the same problems but managed just fine without special classes and free trips with funded extra schooling because he cant stop being a dick in class. Just like people who have dyslexia with manifests as an inability to spell. I cant spell. My hand writing is atrocious, I probably qualify for mild dyslexia under some tarded rules. I dont have dyslexia, I just cant spell and my hand writing is crap because I'm left handed.

Its THIS sort of thing I'm complaining about. The people who work 8 hours a week and claim benefits because they can rather than work a 30+ hour week like everyone else.

I have noting against an old solider claiming his due after 15 years of active service. ESPECIALLY if the active service has contributed to his current state. But the general benefits economy we have running atm CANNOT continue to function. The lower income bracket is guna HAVE to be the worst hit whether they like it or not because you cant take benefits away from people who cant or wont claim them, and the higher income bracket tax bracket is already being taxed to breaking point, some of those people pay over 40% of their income in tax ffs what MORE do you want? In my personal opinion, income tax should be a flat % like 20% of your income. Everyone loses the same % of their income. I don't see why just because you earn more you should be levied with more costs to fund people who earn less.
I can see where you are coming from but 30 years ago we had mines and ship yards that people with those ailments would have worked in. The tories basically destroyed manual labour meaning these people were out of a job. It was the labour government that has been trying to pick up the pieces from this, and that is why people say labour have failed. Also, with the current economy, more businesses are closing which effects those 'special' people who still have jobs. I agree with the idea of equal income tax but you can't take people's benifits off them. Do you really think they don't want to work? Granted some don't but I can safely say the majority do. If the current government find can them jobs, great, we will save money on benifits but if they can't, they shouldm't still take them off them. Even university degrees are becoming meaningless now so how doyou expect people who can't get qualifications to manage?

There is a big difference between cant get qualifications and wont. To give you an idea, I grew up in Hull. The city has over 10% unemployment. There simply aren't the jobs to go round. My sister applied for a job job at Morrisons. They had 5 vacancies. They got over 250 applications. For those people, I sympathise. But for every person trying to get a job there are 5 who just don't bother. I know people with A-levels who have been living on the dole since they left college. They haven't even TRIED to get jobs. I know via proxy one guy who has turned down over 10 jobs offered by the job search centre because "he has to catch the bus to work". WTF kind of excuse is that? I have a "friend" who got sacked because his job wouldn't let him take off any time he wanted. They gave him 4 days off for medical reasons, because it was to uncomfortable for him to mover around much, but after that I personally couldn't see why he couldn't work, he was going to the shops, taking his kid to the park, but somehow he cant work behind a counter....He refused to go back, so they sacked him. Imo, thats fair play on his jobs part. But as far as he was concerned they were being unreasonable. He HAD a job and he blew it off cos he couldn't be arsed, and has been living on the taxpayers dime ever since. Like 2 years now. Needless to say I lost all respect for him after this debacle.

And this is in an area with over 10% unemployment. Some people would count themselves lucky to have a job and go in any day they are physically allowed to. But reliably you go to the job centre and its the same 50 guys queueing up every week to turn down jobs. And thats just the days I went.

Then you get areas where people are DESPERATE for workers. You see a recruiting poster in every other shop window and STILL you have estates in these areas when half the people don't have jobs and are not in education.

Also, saying the Tories destroyed our industry is a misnomer. As long as we have a minimum wage our industry's like that were doomed. The same company's can extract the same mineral from a mine in a different country that is worth the same amount, they can then ship it half way around the world to be smelted and they distribute it globally for 1/5th of the price they can just extract it in the UK. Then you add in all our over done health and safety and the fact that ~EVERYONE, literally EVERYONE claims benefits for something or other due to ill health no matter how minor. Its amazing we still have any running mines at all tbh. To say any one government was the sole cause of the downfall of industry in the UK is just being ignorant. The Tory's might have given it that final push but they were already standing on a crumbling precipice. It was only a matter of time.

Now might not be the best time to start cutting back due to the economy, but we have no choice. Everyone is just guna have to suck it up.


Interestingly. You know those MASSIVE cuts everyone is up in arms over? You realise thats not even reducing our debt right? All thats done is attempted to get it to the point we are no longer going into debt.



EDIT: Side note. At one point my mum turned a promotion and py rise DOWN because the increase in income would have resulted in a net loss to household income due to the loss of benefits. So she delayed her promotion 3 months. This sort of this is a disgrace that the system allows it to happen. How can ANYONE justify a system that causes you to LOSE money when you get a promotion.
Mate, I live in Sunderland, unemployment is massive up here. I have been looking for a part time job for 2 years and still can't get one. Also, you talk about mining over-seas but surely you realise they get people from that country as miners, meaning that people in out country are still out of job? We may make more money that way but this is paying for their benifits. It is 6 and two 3s but I know I would prefer to have my country working than getting more money just to give to them. Earlier you spoke of ailments in people, now it seems that all you speak of is laziness. It seems that you argument has shifted, first talking about people with ADHD and dyslexia and now people who can't be bothered.
I know we are not going to agree on certain policies as it appears we support different parties, all I am saying is that some people can't help being unemployed and with the tories messing up the education system now, it doesn't look good for the future.
 

Tim_Buoy

New member
Jul 7, 2010
568
0
0
niblik said:
manaman said:
The current administration of the US seems to be doing everything it can to run the country into the ground, yet most people have no idea how damaging many of the policies are in the long run, and Obama still continues to have a bit of his 'rockstar' status among the 20-35 age group.
When it comes to which administration ran the US into the ground, I think you might want to focus on who was in the White House over the previous 8 years instead of who has been in it for two.

Things have been building towards a mess in the US for over a decade. You can't expect anyone to seriously believe that its been rainbows and sunshine until suddenly a Democratic black man was voted in as the U.S. President.

Anyway, I'd rather focus on productive ideas for fixing all of our problems world-wide rather than just pointing fingers... its easy to *****. How about working to fix things?
im tiered of all this blame bush stuff was he a great president no was he decent he was ok he had to be president through a war a national disaster and a bunch of city destroying hurricanes could you honestly deal with all that and at least he didnt take two vacations in his first two years of presidency im from the us and i feel the elected officials are suit wearing children who cant see past there petty little differences to solve the major problems
 

ThePantomimeThief

New member
Nov 9, 2009
252
0
0
The current British government is stupid as hell. The Tories are absolute idiots and will start blaming the problems of the country on immigrants and asylum seekers within two years after their economic policies fall flat. The Liberal Democrats have proved everyone's fears right, that they're a bunch of yes men with no real conviction. The alternative, Labour, have completely lost their morals and are about to disappear up their own collective arsehole in a bout of backstabbing and infighting. The best thing is that nobody seems to give a shit, because, hey, it's party politics and you've got to choose whether you're a red or a blue (or a yellow) even if all the choices are the equivalent of choosing to let a cobra bite you in the eyeball whilst a honey badger chews off your feet.

But still, it beats the alternative doesn't it?
 

Death-of-Penguins

New member
Mar 2, 2010
181
0
0
Well, to be fair, the UK's current government hasn't really had enough time to make as big an impact as the last one yet. However, I, and my family, haven't had a any problems as of yet with the current government in Westminster.

However, that doesn't stop me disliking Alex Salmond at the moment. Not so much his policies, but the fact that a twenty five minute show being put on by some kids had to be cut by a fifth so he could leave early. He just couldn't spare those five minutes he said he could. But that's more personal.
 

blindthrall

New member
Oct 14, 2009
1,151
0
0
To the OP: I blame that more on the ADHD bullshit hype. It's a fake condition used to market dangerous and unproven drugs to children, the only market drug companies haven't cornered yet. Next one on the slate is Asperger's.

The only governments I don't think are run by idiots are

Canada, they actually give a shit about the constituency.

Sweden, and to a lesser extent the other Scandinavian countries, cause the world is going to end up at least semi-socialist eventually, may as well learn the ropes now.

China, because they haven't had a revolution or a famine for a few decades. Ruling China is HARD. Plus, they pretty much rule the world from an economic standpoint.
 
Jan 11, 2009
1,237
0
0
vallorn said:
itl get better now that we've kicked the stalinists out and have some sane people in charge.

unless those idiots in the unions decide that they can defy a democratic government (remember the 1970's?)

or if the EU disbands all national governments and imposes the Grand Kingdom Of Europe on us (in which case im leaving for the good ol US of A)
Ok, first of all, this is The Escapist, correct spelling and grammar is actively encouraged (That means start using it, like now).

Grammar Nazi-ism aside, Stalinists? Really? Aside from the fact that New Labour is more of a Centrist party, calling a party Stalinist because it's Left Wing is like calling any Right-Wing party Nazi.

Secondly, are you saying there should be no right to protest for the working class? Because every Democratic government in history believes in Freedom of Protest as a human right so yes, Unions can defy a Democratic government.

Finally, there is nothing I hate more than people who overestimate the power of organisations like the EU or UN. In this case, The EU is primarily a economical organisation and its main aim is to promote free trade within itself. So basically if we weren't in it, it would be incredibly difficult to sell any produce to any of the member countries and while we remain in it, it encourages European interest in our goods over American for example therefore stimulating our economy.

But despite of all of this I really would not mind seeing you leave for America.
 

Wayneguard

New member
Jun 12, 2010
2,085
0
0
Guy Montag said:
is everyone REALLY this nihilistic about government?

Winston Churchill said that democracy was the worst system, except for all the others. Yes, elected leaders by their nature suck, because they need to stay popular and thus restrict what they do for the greater good of the country. Although it'd be great if we could just put all of our faith in a leader that isn't responsible to the people, it'd be way too risky because he could just as easily screw us all over.
The last American president who I can wholeheartedly say I agree with politically and philosophically was Grover Cleveland... in 1884... No, I don't think that elected leaders by virtue of them having to please large constituencies are shitty; there just literally hasn't been one I like since 1884 >_>
 

blindthrall

New member
Oct 14, 2009
1,151
0
0
Tim_Buoy said:
niblik said:
manaman said:
The current administration of the US seems to be doing everything it can to run the country into the ground, yet most people have no idea how damaging many of the policies are in the long run, and Obama still continues to have a bit of his 'rockstar' status among the 20-35 age group.
When it comes to which administration ran the US into the ground, I think you might want to focus on who was in the White House over the previous 8 years instead of who has been in it for two.

Things have been building towards a mess in the US for over a decade. You can't expect anyone to seriously believe that its been rainbows and sunshine until suddenly a Democratic black man was voted in as the U.S. President.

Anyway, I'd rather focus on productive ideas for fixing all of our problems world-wide rather than just pointing fingers... its easy to *****. How about working to fix things?
im tiered of all this blame bush stuff was he a great president no was he decent he was ok he had to be president through a war a national disaster and a bunch of city destroying hurricanes could you honestly deal with all that and at least he didnt take two vacations in his first two years of presidency im from the us and i feel the elected officials are suit wearing children who cant see past there petty little differences to solve the major problems
About the level of literacy I've come to expect from Bush apologists. And no, I'm not a liberal, I just really hate Bush. He turned a billion dollar surplus into a trillion dollar deficit. He started a war in Iraq based on obvious fabrications, to benefit the oil companies and military-industrial complex that got him elected in the first place. And thanks to him, the world looks at the US as a retarded bully. He's the worst president we've ever had.

EDIT: His dad was alright. And Afghanistan was justified, if completely impractical.
 

Jark212

Certified Deviant
Jul 17, 2008
4,455
0
0
I think that only half of the US Government is composed of idiots, but it's those idiots that impeding the whole process.

There are idiots in all political parties, not necessarily just in one...
 

AvsJoe

Elite Member
May 28, 2009
9,055
0
41
No, I have never thought that way about any of my country's leaders. Ever. Poseidon, king of the seas, and Edbert, my talking pet unicorn, both agree with me.
 

teisjm

New member
Mar 3, 2009
3,561
0
0
Quite often, regardless of the fact that i vote for the current opposition.

They're all (including teh people i've voted for so far) so bad a bunch of media whores, who cares too much about their own political images, and too little about actually improving anything, that i'm seriously considering whether it's really worth voting anymore. What can you do in a democracy when all the people you have to choose between only care about what their spin doctors says will be good for their images?
 
Mar 9, 2010
2,722
0
0
BigZ225 said:
All the time and no matter who is in power, it still feels like the same dicks. However having said that, Cameron/Clegg at least feel better, than that droopy faced dick that we had before.
I would much rather prefer to see his droopy face than his smile though.

OT: Yes, all the fucking time. It kinda makes me want to go into politics but I fear becoming one of them because the rest are only in it for money and I can do nothing. I think it would be much more beneficial to the entire country if the person who ran the labour party knew what it meant to actually fucking WORK
 

Something Amyss

Aswyng and Amyss
Dec 3, 2008
24,759
0
0
Dublin Solo said:
You know what's great about democratic governments? They're elected.

My two cents, which maybe are not very helpful.
Yeah, I think my country is run by idiots. I also think you get the government you deserve.

As for the original post, I remember the last time this came up, Fox News had a story about a man who couldn't get life saving treatment in the UK. Turns out it wasn't life saving, the drug wasn't indicated for his condition, and it was perhaps the most expensive drug they could have looked to.

I'm skeptical about stories like this because they often leave out details that would make them look less ludicrous.
 

TehIrishSoap

New member
Aug 18, 2010
382
0
0
Yesterday, The Irish Prime Minister Went On The Radio, And Gave An Interview, While (Most Of The Country Suspect) DRUNK.