My argument moves but its all port of the part problem. Paying benefits to people who don't need or deserve it. Be it through laziness or supposed illness or even just a crappy flawed and easily manipulated system.dragonslayer32 said:snip
I'm not guna say anything, part of the "household income" I told you my mum delayed her promotion to get kept me and my bro in the £30 EMA bracket at college for an extra year, rather than dropping to £10.
I'm not saying we should pay people who genuinely fall on hard times shouldn't be helped. If it wasn't for benefits, I would have been on the bread line when my dad walked out refusing to pay a penny, till the CSA decided it would make him.
But its just too easy to "become ill" and unable to work, to easy to turn down jobs for stupid reasons. To easy to stay getting money from the government than, rather than working for it, and you get too much. Like I said, I've manipulated the system, and by staying on a lower income for longer we got more money overall. Its a bloody stupid system. This should NEVER be the case, and Im saying this as someone who BENEFITED from it.
The whole think about industry, nothing to do with government. They are all privately owned and so will be moved where the private sector believes they can make most profit. With the solo exception of HQ's for convenience and prestige, which is paper pushers and managers anyway. All white collar jobs.
People need to accept the UK has become the first country EVER, again, to enter a new stage of development. The post industrial stage. The US is moving towards this, as are several other 1st world nations. Stop blaming the inevitable collapse of the industry on one specific government. The only way we could have possibly kept those industry's going would have been to pump government money into them, a great idea, I mean Labor has been doing that for the last 12 years and we are now 130 BILLION in debt and have lost our AAA debtors rating for the first time in history.