Dys said:
JourneyThroughHell said:
The word everybody is not particularly applicable here, but the massive hatred for MW2 on here has always left me perplexed and shocked.
And, yes, I've played the PC version.
Also, the next gen Double Agent. Haven't experienced a single bug.
I don't think the hatred is set aside for MW2 is because it's particularly bad, more because it wasn't as good[footnote]It has shorter single player, no dedicated servers on PC, smaller multiplayer games (as a result) as well as arguably worse perks/maps than it's predecessor, it just didn't feel as lovingly crafted as any of the earlier call of duty games.[/footnote] as previous games in the series and was met with huge commercial success. I'm confident that if it had received mediocre reviews and was punished by the media for it's shortfallings (rather than being touted as 'teh bestest thing evar!1') it would have a solid fanbase and those that hate it would simply have no interest.
Alright, got quoted like three times, decided I'll respond to the biggest comment.
I would seriously argue that it's not worse than Modern Warfare. Yes, the dedicated servers are a good thing and the MP in the first game was better - but the campaign is probably the biggest evolution I've ever seen.
Yes, the first game's campaign was absolutely great, but it didn't have the absolute mayhem of special effects and set pieces of the second one. If Call Of Duty 4 had a bunch of stand-out moments, Modern Warfare 2 was all one big standout moment.
I also played World At War for that occasion, game that is lauded as good for people who disliked MW2.
I have no idea ho anyone could reach that conclusion with the frankly empty campaign it has.
Also, another reason I found MW2 superior to the previous installments was the amazing, challenging coop mode. I still play Spec Ops.
Spec Ops was so good, because it was not a coop campaign - the action was more condensed, more varied, oh, and you didn't have to watch the same cutscenes 50 fucking times (Reach, World At War).