Word-for-word agree.Insert Funny Name Here said:
It was just... broken. But the doggie was nice.
Fable II Opinions
- Thread starter TheFacelessOne
- Start date
Recommended Videos
It was just... broken. But the doggie was nice.
Intresting...I would consider butting into someone-else's discussion, running your mouth off with no credible source or logic and then leaving to be incredibly "twattish" but, then again, people with no knowledge tend to be the ones who shout the loudest, as that is the only way they will ever be taken seriously (not that I'm taking you seriously, don't worry your post shows such a lack understanding).Obtusifolius said:
OK, if I really need to spell my comment out to you (and Hannahdonno who this may well be). Someone posted that the young character looked like they have steroids - after my reply they even sent me a message with more detail as to their reasoning behind this - one that, whilst makes sense, is theoretically incorrect. Notice that line - the young characters, so already you've mis-interpreted my argument by claiming they were referring to all a characters... great start.
I was then "shown up" was I...? I don't see how thats true, especially a I had a counter-argument . The fact is, as I explained, the opening characters lived as orphans in a magical Victorian style age. Of course, this lifestyle may have lead to some form of drug-abuse in our world, but this is not our world - its Albion. If we were to assume that steroids did exist in Albion then, we would also have to take into account the time period. During the Victorian age drugs such as Opium or Morphine was wide-spread - steroids were first discovered in the 1930's and were not widespread until the 60's - whilst the Victorian age ended in 1901. So in that sense steroids would not have existed during Fable's set time period.
I was then "shown up" was I...? I don't see how thats true, especially a I had a counter-argument . The fact is, as I explained, the opening characters lived as orphans in a magical Victorian style age. Of course, this lifestyle may have lead to some form of drug-abuse in our world, but this is not our world - its Albion. If we were to assume that steroids did exist in Albion then, we would also have to take into account the time period. During the Victorian age drugs such as Opium or Morphine was wide-spread - steroids were first discovered in the 1930's and were not widespread until the 60's - whilst the Victorian age ended in 1901. So in that sense steroids would not have existed during Fable's set time period.
Why does matter you ask - because the original commenter said "they look like they are on steroids" - they did not say, as they should have done if they did not want this interpreted differently - that the character's bodies were inproportionate. The fact of the matter is - I commented, yes, but the fact is I was not attacking said person - I may have taken their comment too literally based on reflection, but at the same time wording is key to any post - and said post was not worded properly.
Intresting how ironic your post is too...you attack me for criticising someone elses argument and then claim attacking someone appears to make the hostile force a "twat"...
Effectively, steroids would have been an improbability in this time period. Besides which there are many types of steroids, but I assume the original poster was referring to Anabolic steroids. In which case, simply injecting steroids would not significantly increase muscle size - what steroids allow the athlete to do is gain bigger muscles because they are able to continue pushing the tissue for longer. I'd like to see a credible source that say otherwise because I can't find one - whilst it IS a very popular myth.
Wow...what a waste of 3 minutes, not to worry, your post is void, meaningless, forgotten - in short - a waste of space. I could well be wrong about steroids, I'm no expert I am only quoting what I know to be true. I would suggest you leave the forums if your going to continue attacking people in such an idiotic and derogatory manor - over something that does not concern you - especially as you have added no meaningful discussion - you've only forced me to explain points I have already made. Yes this argument in stupid and I think both sides would have left it, unfortuntaly you who, as ironey has shown us, is dubbed "a twat". (I think you should look-up what the word "Twat" is generally used for before throwing around like that) Continued it.
P.S Don't bother replying, I'm not going to read it.
It's ok, I didn't like that the morality feature was so black and white. I mean there was the blatentaly evil thing to do then the good thing. I also would have enjoyed it more if they focused on the RPG elements more. Also abit more variety and stuff to do when you've beaten it. Oh and last complaint I would of enjoyed a final boss =P
But it was good for what it was.
But it was good for what it was.
That's funny because I feel like playng again even though it was quite disappointing...Leorex said:
I think it was a bit of a mess really. A combination of interesting to down right retarded ideas clumbed together to make an unfinished mess of a game. It did have it's moments. The combat was pretty fun, it make me laugh once or twice and I though Stephens Fry's part as Reazer was simply genius. But the bad out weigh the good, what with a terrible story, short length, a rediculous amount of bugs, no challenge and quite simply the worst bit of DLC I have ever bought.
I loved Fable TLC. But Fable 2 is pretty damn shite.
I loved Fable TLC. But Fable 2 is pretty damn shite.
Loved it, untill about 3/4 of the way through, then i disliked it, then peter went and made me download the 'free version' of knothole which is essentially JUST a cocking sub that will taunt me forever by never taking me anywhere ¬_¬. So now, fuck that shit.
i liked the game; i loved it even more when i got bored and started killing everyone in town instead of doing the missions
I thought it was fun but then it grated on my nerves, everything everyone else complained about makes sense but what also bugged the hell out of me was that my guy looked like a damn buzz lightyear action figure by the time I made it to the spire, square jaw bald head and fisher price smile, for some reason it caused me to freak the hell out in anger.
This is the only section I am interested in because quite frankly I'd say your right. I did overlook the use of the simile and take the OP too literally. I accept that, but then again, as I said originally (and you, again ignored) the argument was over, you veered your troll head and tried (consequently succeeding) to troll.Obtusifolius said:
Heres another point though - Pigs can fly...
As I have just said that, it must be true right?
Wrong...and thats exactly the way your treating Hanna's comment - with the same idiocy. She has no credible source or any form of proof that what she says is correct and yet you just beleive her counter-argument to be 100% accurate. I made an original comment, she followed up with a counter-argument, one that was very specific and, in my opinion, wrong. Yet from your point of view I was "shown up". Find me a credible source that claims that to gain large bodies from steroids you can simply inject them directly into your muscles, you won't have to do any training. I searched and couldn't ind any. Hence the counter-argument you just ignored because...well, I assume because it didn't match with what you wanted to see.
This argument was never about Fable after the second post, we were arguing about steroids and their effects.
I loved Fable TLC, so I was really looking forward to this game. I played the hell out of it and got all the achievements as well (which was really easy), but it hindsight it wasn't anything special. Just like everyone else has said, it was short, easy, crap story/bosses, crap multiplayer, crap relationship motiff, crap gold system, etc. etc. etc. And only three trolls? WTF? I mean, they weren't challenging, but at least throw some actual variety in the enemies (more trolls/shards/bosses, etc.) My favorite part of the entire game was the dog.
I'm still like every other moron in my hopefulness that the next Fable ANYTHING will be better, and like a moron I still listen to PM when he promises the next DLC will be substantial and expansive and blah blah blah.
As far as RPGs on the 360 go, it's probably right in the middle, if not a little lower.
I'm still like every other moron in my hopefulness that the next Fable ANYTHING will be better, and like a moron I still listen to PM when he promises the next DLC will be substantial and expansive and blah blah blah.
As far as RPGs on the 360 go, it's probably right in the middle, if not a little lower.
You don't get it do you, if you had read my post you would have realized I was explaining that your pathetic claim that Hanna's view was somehow right, yet mine was wrong despite the lack of evidence to the contrary bewildering, especially as you repeated the fact I got "shown up" a number of times - in fact you made it one of your Key points. I am trying to explain to you that you are wrong on this point. You would have also realized I had accepted I was wrong with regards to the figure of speech, but then again, you would actually have to read someones post; not skim-read.Obtusifolius said:
Besides which, you think I care if I was wrong or not, there is no need to act like such a troll and throw excessive derogatory comments at people over an interpretation, especially over the Internet. How about you actually read before posting.