John Funk said:We do proofread. Sometimes things slip through the cracks. Happens. Thanks for pointing it outOANST said:I'm referring to the replacement of the word "threat" with the word "thread". This is why I chose the words proof read and not the words spell check.John Funk said:Did you know that "handheld" is listed as a typo? Just because there's a red line under it doesn't mean it's incorrectOANST said:Do you think it's possible that you guys could start proof reading your articles before hitting the post button? There are more spelling mistakes and grammatical errors in this site's articles than there are on 4chan.![]()
![]()
3D gaming just doesn't sound good to me, I bet it destroys immersion rather than enhancing it.John Funk said:Did you know that "handheld" is listed as a typo? Just because there's a red line under it doesn't mean it's incorrect![]()
Agreed, though Sega wasn't nearly as successful as Apple is right now. Thing is, though, the iPad and iPhone are kind of a different market from the DS...Flying-Emu said:This man is an idiot. Why are we paying attention to what he said? So he wrote FF7. Whoop-dee-fucking-do. That gives him no authority when it comes to business projections.
Nintendo does have an enemy in Apple, but just like they always have, Nintendo will come out better for the competition. They did it with Sega, and they've only grown exponentially since then.
But what's been Nintendo's competition in hand helds? I haven't really seen anything from anyone else that could put a noticeable dent Nintendo's sales for hand held game systems. In that regard, hasn't Nintendo been more or less getting a free ride?John Funk said:FF7 Writer: Nintendo Era Is Over
But I have to take a bit of umbrage with the second half of that statement. Hey Mr. Kato, have you seen how well Nintendo's hardware has been selling this generation? It's not so much digging its own grave as it is lining its own bed - with hundred-dollar bills.
Frankly, you are. Just sayin'.OANST said:John Funk said:We do proofread. Sometimes things slip through the cracks. Happens. Thanks for pointing it outOANST said:I'm referring to the replacement of the word "threat" with the word "thread". This is why I chose the words proof read and not the words spell check.John Funk said:Did you know that "handheld" is listed as a typo? Just because there's a red line under it doesn't mean it's incorrectOANST said:Do you think it's possible that you guys could start proof reading your articles before hitting the post button? There are more spelling mistakes and grammatical errors in this site's articles than there are on 4chan.![]()
![]()
I get that things slip through the cracks. I get that. But at least two thirds of the articles I read on this site have errors that slip through the cracks. You can assume that I'm exaggerating if you want, but I'm not.
I by no means am saying that there is no credence to his claim. But saying that the "Nintendo Era" is over less than six months after the iPad is released is folly. The iPad definitely has the potential to end Nintendo, but then again, so did Sony, Sega, and a number of other companies. If the pattern holds, Nintendo will find some clever way to draw the crowd back.Tenmar said:While you are right Emu that he isn't the expert to be making these calls what he does say have some credence. Never doubt the power of the apple cult or the mac life. Their penetration into the consumer side is once again the rhyming of history of Nintendo knowing their current base and Apple going past that Nintendo base and reaching that new demographic. The reason it is only working now is because of how accepted playing video games have become along with how easy it is to have access to video games.Flying-Emu said:This man is an idiot. Why are we paying attention to what he said? So he wrote FF7. Whoop-dee-fucking-do. That gives him no authority when it comes to business projections.
Nintendo does have an enemy in Apple, but just like they always have, Nintendo will come out better for the competition. They did it with Sega, and they've only grown exponentially since then.
Apple benefits because the adult gaming base now have those deep pockets they once didn't have in the 80's and 90's. Where people like myself are in our mid twenties or even as far as their early fourties have that disposable income to pay for such products and make a conversion to mac computers or even at the very least become 100% dependent on itunes for music, books and games all because they own an iphone or ipad whether by motivations of vanity or motivations of being "hip" without actually realizing what the iphone was going to become. We now have that money that we decide to waste towards paying for internet and email on our phones instead of using our phones to call people so paying that 600 bucks for an ipad is no problem now especially when the games one is buying only costs at most ten bucks.
Kids and even adults who have those DS are also still not encouraged to bring those handhelds to work or school. An Iphone or Ipad on the other hand is encouraged because one can pass it off as a "working" device due to its main capabilities. I remember that even bringing a DS to play on my break was discouraged while my co-workers would spend their working hours playing iphone games. That illusion of being productive gives employees and employers the ability to allow the iphone and ipad to exist within formal events where a handheld could not because it is a toy.
This will not however be some instant takeover but instead one of those slow conversions as even parents will decide to just give their kids an iphone instead of getting them a DS because it will be "easier" than buying a handheld.
Frankly, you have no idea how many or which articles that I read on this site, so your claim to the contrary is ludicrous at best. If you'd like more empirical data, then I will start tracking which articles I bother to read and which have spelling errors.John Funk said:Frankly, you are. Just sayin'.OANST said:John Funk said:We do proofread. Sometimes things slip through the cracks. Happens. Thanks for pointing it outOANST said:I'm referring to the replacement of the word "threat" with the word "thread". This is why I chose the words proof read and not the words spell check.John Funk said:Did you know that "handheld" is listed as a typo? Just because there's a red line under it doesn't mean it's incorrectOANST said:Do you think it's possible that you guys could start proof reading your articles before hitting the post button? There are more spelling mistakes and grammatical errors in this site's articles than there are on 4chan.![]()
![]()
I get that things slip through the cracks. I get that. But at least two thirds of the articles I read on this site have errors that slip through the cracks. You can assume that I'm exaggerating if you want, but I'm not.
What's a FAIL?duchaked said:I don't think Nintendo is going to fail because of Apple
not that I don't think Nintendo is a FAIL nowadays, frankly, but economically
Be my guest. But I assure you, we do proofread pretty extensively. Not saying that things don't slip through the cracks every now and then - and please, bring them to our attention when they do - but suggesting otherwise is pretty insulting given that we pride ourselves on the strength of our editorial content, and are up in the Webbies alongside The New York Times, the New Yorker, and Wired for just that. So we must be doing SOMETHING rightOANST said:Frankly, you have no idea how many or which articles that I read on this site, so your claim to the contrary is ludicrous at best. If you'd like more empirical data, then I will start tracking which articles I bother to read and which have spelling errors.John Funk said:Frankly, you are. Just sayin'.OANST said:John Funk said:We do proofread. Sometimes things slip through the cracks. Happens. Thanks for pointing it outOANST said:I'm referring to the replacement of the word "threat" with the word "thread". This is why I chose the words proof read and not the words spell check.John Funk said:Did you know that "handheld" is listed as a typo? Just because there's a red line under it doesn't mean it's incorrectOANST said:Do you think it's possible that you guys could start proof reading your articles before hitting the post button? There are more spelling mistakes and grammatical errors in this site's articles than there are on 4chan.![]()
![]()
I get that things slip through the cracks. I get that. But at least two thirds of the articles I read on this site have errors that slip through the cracks. You can assume that I'm exaggerating if you want, but I'm not.