Woodsey said:
theSovietConnection said:
I really don't get the love for the Half-Life series. Well, I won't be ignorant, I get the love for the first Half-Life, but the problem is that it was good, or at least revolutionary, as far as the first game is concerned. The second is little more then a mute protaganist hurtling inevitably towards glory because... well, because. Which sounds an awful lot like Halo to me. Really, with the second game, I only found three major differences between it and the Halo series.
1. Master Chief talks.
2. Half-Life 2 remains in the first-person perspective.
3. Gordan Freeman was never formally given military training.
"Inevitably towards glory" ? You've played HL2 to the end, right?
And I seriously doubt those are the only differences you can find; more like they're the only differences you're willing to see.
You're the only one who can stop the alien incursion, for reasons that aren't really explained. You just are.
A faction of the alien alliance has turned over to your side.
You're a power armoured dude everyone loves.
For some reason your melee attack is ridiculously overpowered.
You disappear only to inevitably reappear later (we all know the MC isn't gone for good, makes Microsoft too much money).
Zombie-alien hybrids.
Maybe you saw more in it then I did, hell, I wouldn't doubt you did, as
HL2 never drew my attention much at all, so there probably is a lot I didn't see. But all I really got from it was another
Halo style shooter that went a little heavier on the narrative and a lot heavier on the physics puzzles.