What about polygynous marriage? Polyandrous marriage? Cultures in which some anatomically male people are considered female for all intents and purposes, including marriage and the subsequent sex?Skullkid4187 said:
Gays and Homophobia
- Thread starter UncertaintyPrinciple
- Start date
Recommended Videos
Where have you derived this belief from? It seems to be very specific, have you based this criteria on Thomas Aquinas' Natural Law theory?Skullkid4187 said:
It is impossible for different things to be equal. Sure. I guess. But it's not impossible for different things to be given equal protection and rights under the law. And, it's not impossible for you to treat different human beings as the sensitive and nuanced creatures they are.Freezy_Breezy said:
Valid point, you believe that gays become their own worst enemy in their fight for equality by pointing out that they are different. But wouldn't they need to do this so people know who needs to be given better rights? How can the world change if we don't know what the problems are?Freezy_Breezy said:
PS: Please be careful not to start ranting, sometimes people may take a rant out of context and conflict can result. Thank you for your cooperation
Ok, what about polygamy? And just so we're on the same page here, serial monogamy, like we have here in the 'States. You're only married to one person at a time, but you divorce and remarry, divorce and remarry, to the point where the marriage bed will have been shared by more partners than in most openly polygamous arrangements?Skullkid4187 said:
I'm straight, and i don't really care if a person is gay/bi/lesbian/straight.
As long as it feel's right too that person, that's all that matters
As long as it feel's right too that person, that's all that matters
I am not against anyone based solely on their sexual prefrence.
I have said it before and I will say it again, I cannot comprehend how a civilization such as these on earth can be considered advanced while they still allow people who see sexual orientation as grounds for critisizm or riticule to reamain as they are. I know its their choice, but it's one of the few sides of an argument where I can't play devil's advocate.
I have said it before and I will say it again, I cannot comprehend how a civilization such as these on earth can be considered advanced while they still allow people who see sexual orientation as grounds for critisizm or riticule to reamain as they are. I know its their choice, but it's one of the few sides of an argument where I can't play devil's advocate.
You shouldnt marry at all if you know youre going to get bored or divorce later on. Polygamy is just so.....wrong, the whole type in general seems more of lust then loveconflictofinterests said: