Sony's office in the US is in California, Hotz lives in NY. SONY wants to use the Californian laws against Hotz, not the New York laws.9_6 said:Okay, what the fuck is it with their fetish for california?
Seriously.
Sony's office in the US is in California, Hotz lives in NY. SONY wants to use the Californian laws against Hotz, not the New York laws.9_6 said:Okay, what the fuck is it with their fetish for california?
Seriously.
It's another tactic meant to increase the financial burden for GeoHotz by forcing him to fly out to California every time they have a court date. There's also probably some kind of California law that's biased towards Sony's side that doesn't exist in New York.9_6 said:Okay, what the fuck is it with their fetish for california?
Seriously.
Legally, there's no such thing as debtor's prison, either. Doesn't mean you can't effectively be placed there....googleback said:personally, I think They're going to bleed down his expenses till he cant fight back regardless. All this extra time Hotz's lawyers have to cut through bureaucracy is costing him money and unlike with sony... this is eventually going to run out.
aren't there laws against doing that though?
I think you mean the court? I read over it a couple of times and thought "Huh...".Logan Westbrook said:Sony petitioned the caught for permission to search Hotz's computers for evidence of the SDK.
So rather than innocent until proven guilty and justice, you'd rather have the courts set a legal precedent that we as consumers own neither the console we play the games on or the games themselves, simply because you don't like George Hotz?Pendragon9 said:Geohot is a disgusting example of a hacker/pirate that I hope loses. I frankly don't care what dangerous legal precedent this sets. I refuse to support such a person.
For one, I doubt that in the grand scheme of things, the Geohot hack as made a huge uptick in piracy, if we look on a large scale. However, if you have some evidence, by all means...AnythingOutstanding said:Well, whatever method that Sony uses, I just hope that they win this one. If they lose, then piracy will skyrocket. That's not good![]()
Welcome to the escapist. Pirates are worse then murders and should be tortured to death and the almight company is always right.Zom-B said:So rather than innocent until proven guilty and justice, you'd rather have the courts set a legal precedent that we as consumers own neither the console we play the games on or the games themselves, simply because you don't like George Hotz?Pendragon9 said:Geohot is a disgusting example of a hacker/pirate that I hope loses. I frankly don't care what dangerous legal precedent this sets. I refuse to support such a person.
I'm really glad you're in the minority on this one.
its ok according to the app gopee the next 6 month's are gonna go back and forth blaming each other about stuff that has nothing to do with the case so i think you can take a popcorn run while that happensreddfawks said:Seriously, people...
...I'm running out of popcorn for this...
Leads to more piracy, tbh. Spore's SecuROM debacle taught us that much, I thought. Then the pirates get to enjoy a DRM-free game while the consumers are screwed over. Awesome.Zom-B said:Second, if Sony wins this case, look forward to more DRM, more instrusive DRM and less rights for consumers. And that still won't stop piracy. Yeah, that's a real victory.
Exactly this, every penny I had saved up to buy a replacement PS3 before this war started? It's going to GeoHotz when he re-opens donations.danpascooch said:Fuck that, he already has tons of donations for his legal fees, and if he starts to run dry I plan to contribute myself, because this is complete bullshit.googleback said:personally, I think They're going to bleed down his expenses till he cant fight back regardless. All this extra time Hotz's lawyers have to cut through bureaucracy is costing him money and unlike with sony... this is eventually going to run out.
aren't there laws against doing that though?
They can't stall the courts decision forever, donations are going to lead Geohotz to the win!
I agree that it leads to more piracy in a way. By including more, and more restrictive, DRM schemes Sony and other companies will definitely drive indignant gamers to pirate a game simply out of spite, while at the same time treating legitimate game purchasers as criminals.Crimsane said:The longer this draws out, the worse Sony looks, regardless of who's actually right. People tend to root for the underdog in cases like this.
Leads to more piracy, tbh. Spore's SecuROM debacle taught us that much, I thought. Then the pirates get to enjoy a DRM-free game while the consumers are screwed over. Awesome.Zom-B said:Second, if Sony wins this case, look forward to more DRM, more instrusive DRM and less rights for consumers. And that still won't stop piracy. Yeah, that's a real victory.
Sorry, but I have to agree with this statement here.Pendragon9 said:Sony is misleading the courts?
Well, I didn't see that through all of Geohot's deceit. What with the whole "encouraging people to ban others from PSN" fiasco and "rapping about how all big corporations are evil" while taking bribes from Microsoft, etc.
Geohot is a disgusting example of a hacker/pirate that I hope loses. I frankly don't care what dangerous legal precedent this sets. I refuse to support such a person.