hoopyfrood said:
That's not demonstration.
I didn't realize that the solution to double standards is to create more of them.
Stating something creates it now?
What you are complaining about is an absence of perfection, which is common for feminists. As long as there is even one rape per year, or even one society where women can't have a legal abortion, it's proof positive of the fact that women (in Western countries) are horribly oppressed and must fight The Man. If men were to compile a similiar list using the same logic, do you have any idea how long it would be?
And what are you trying to say, anyway? That women should abandon morality because some men have?
Please, do compile this list. I await it. Just like I await your evidence.
I see absence of morality in any kind of inequality. I'm still waiting for a display of where feminism is about that exactly. Do be forthcoming. The repression of women in western culture is very different in manifestation but come down to similar points of sexuality control, bodily control and financial control.
I have encountered so many cases where it turns out that the women aren't actually doing an equal amount of work. They have the same job and position, but they work less.
Where?
Abortion is legal in most Western countries. If you are suggesting that women should have an absolute right to abort, you are advocating rights without responsibilities. If you have drunken, unprotected with someone, you should not have a right to abort, for example. Also, it is a double standard that while women can abort a child if they so choose, a man cannot choose to abort his financial responsibilities towards the child.
Why shouldn't I have the right to abort after drunken sex? If said drunken sex involved a condom which broke would the alcohol negate the right to abort? I think that in the event of a relationship that the choice to abort should be discussed first and if either party considers themself unfit to be a parent then it would be a good option, or adoption for those women willing to carry to term. In the case of men paying child support I believe that the state should provide much more support for children than it does which would relieve men from that duty.
You have that right, just like men have the right to say "no" when someone threatens them with a gun and demands their wallet.
Not socially I don't. There's the presumption that sex is consented to off a checklist or something. Bought dinner for her? Check. Few drinks, check. She refused? What? That fucking *****! I bought dinner you slut! I've seen it happen.
You can keep saying that for as long as you like, but the proof is in the pudding.
So serve up the desert. I'm waiting. Still.
Too bad women don't actually like men who stay at home or get beaten by their wives or girlfriends. Men are expected to be manly.
Which goes against, da-da-DA the principles of feminism, which say that neither men nor women should have gender roles and expectations imposed upon them. Incidentally I wouldn't mind a partner who stayed at home, though that implies there would be children in the relationship, which is as likely as me walking on the moon.