Sorry to burst your bubble, but I'm a "girl gamer", and I'm fine with playing games where I go around butchering people. In fact, those are my favourite kinds of games. Any Resident Evil game, the Drakengard games, Doom 3... Pretty much, if it's got blood and gore, I'm gonna play it. And I'm pretty sure that Sheva wasn't put in RE5 because of the racism, but because the developers got sick of hearing people complain about how Ashley was completely useless in the fourth game and if you're gonna make someone follow me around make them USEFUL. If she was there to combat the whole racism thing, well, then I apologize. But please don't assume that games where you walk around butchering the hell out of anything that bleeds is a guys only thing, because it's not.Azulito said:I think that it's fair that some games don't include female orientated content because it ruins it for the majority of gamers if its put in there for the sake of it. IE. That woman in RE5 was put there due to the whole racism thing and I dislike that that's happened. Whereas chars such as Louis in L4D I'm ok with because that's the original plan. Plus, I don't really look at women being comfortable on games where they go around butchering people. I'm just rambling now xD all gamers are awesome but you can't please everyone :3
And it's fair not to have any female-oriented content? That is one of the most sexist things I've ever heard. So girls can only play games that are bright pink and sparkly? If I had to play something like that I'd stab my own eyes out with a pair of rusty scissors. I think it's commendable that developers are (albiet slowly) turning gaming around to the point where girls can have a game with content geared to them, not to some guy the developers assume are going to play the game. Abd how do you know the majority of gamers are guys? And if they are, how can you condone obliterating the rights of the minority for the pleasure of the majority?