Girl gets poo tattooed on her back
- Thread starter MetaKnight19
- Start date
Recommended Videos
And now she will remember not to fuck around on people. Good for him. I wish I was that creative sometimes, although I don't think I would do that to someone.
I've always been for the idea that people who cheat, men and women, should be marked for life; same thing with incurable transferable diseases (hepatitis, hiv, etc.).
You mean ex? Cause she acted like a shit to him first, (pulled it off BOOSH) and cheated with his BEST friendVirmire said:
I would edit this post. It was proven fake:http://www.thesmokinggun.com/buster/poop-tattoo-story-is-crap-8764319MetaKnight19 said:
Yeah, this whole deal is <url=http://www.thesmokinggun.com/buster/poop-tattoo-story-is-cr
Ah, well then, done and done I suppose.reg42 said:
Ninja'd, but I was going to use Snopes.com [http://www.snopes.com/photos/bodymods/poo.asp]reg42 said:
If it was real: meh, they're both terrible (fake) people. Of course, after a week or two he would have gotten over it, but she'd be stuck with the tattoo permanently, or with a huge removal bill. However, when women retaliate on cheating men with damage against property or body, it's considered "empowering", so there's that.
Good thing this is fake, then, otherwise we'd be opening up a whole can of social worms...
Rossie originally tried to have her ex-lover charged with assault but she had signed a consent form agreeing the tattoo design was "at the artist's discretion".Adeptus Aspartem said:
it will actually be a difficult case if there's a signed document involved.
IMO i wouldn't say she deserved it, but at the same time i cannot feel sympathy for her. shouldn't have been a cheating harlot
Dude....The Last Parade said:
It's fake. By now I might have been ninja'd though, so...*Grins*
But I agree partially with you. Sure, a tattoo THAT big is going too far, but if he had inked one of those shitty penis drawings we all love to draw, and it was maybe at most the size of a hand, and it wasn't big, I'd say "that's good."
Yay, yet again I am sickened by the members of the Escapist (at least it is on a fake story for once!).
Condoning this? Saying the guy was a hero/in the right? That "the *****" deserved it?
I bet most of you were outraged at the story of the bloke getting his penis cut off. I bet most of you would be outraged if this man had thrown acid in the lasses face.
Were this to have actually happened, it is likely to be a permanent disfigurement - even with laser surgery, a tattoo in full colour and of that size is not going to be shifted completely, and is very likely to scar.
Also, were this to have actually happened, the man could still be prosecuted. Even though she signed a waiver that the design of the tattoo was up to the "artist's decision", a lawyer could argue that the contract would be voided by the fact she was drunk. However, and much more importantly (and certainly here in the UK at least, and I imagine the same is true in the US) it is illegal to tattoo a drunk person - the alcohol lowers the rate of blood clotting and lowers blood pressure, creating a real and serious risk. The fact that the article cites that she "passed out" yet he continued with the tattoo is also gross negligence and malpractice. Thus, in this hypothetical case (given it's fake and all) he would likely lose the court case, and probably end up in prison too (aside from the charges mentioned, a good lawyer could also bag assault, arguing that it is similar to how consenting to sleep with someone doesn't mean you cannot file an assault charge if they beat you up/scar you whilst doing so).
But no, everyone must jump on the cool-train bandwagon of laughing at the "stupid whore" and defending this gallant "gentleman" (and I say "gentleman" with as much scorn as possible).
Condoning this? Saying the guy was a hero/in the right? That "the *****" deserved it?
I bet most of you were outraged at the story of the bloke getting his penis cut off. I bet most of you would be outraged if this man had thrown acid in the lasses face.
Were this to have actually happened, it is likely to be a permanent disfigurement - even with laser surgery, a tattoo in full colour and of that size is not going to be shifted completely, and is very likely to scar.
Also, were this to have actually happened, the man could still be prosecuted. Even though she signed a waiver that the design of the tattoo was up to the "artist's decision", a lawyer could argue that the contract would be voided by the fact she was drunk. However, and much more importantly (and certainly here in the UK at least, and I imagine the same is true in the US) it is illegal to tattoo a drunk person - the alcohol lowers the rate of blood clotting and lowers blood pressure, creating a real and serious risk. The fact that the article cites that she "passed out" yet he continued with the tattoo is also gross negligence and malpractice. Thus, in this hypothetical case (given it's fake and all) he would likely lose the court case, and probably end up in prison too (aside from the charges mentioned, a good lawyer could also bag assault, arguing that it is similar to how consenting to sleep with someone doesn't mean you cannot file an assault charge if they beat you up/scar you whilst doing so).
But no, everyone must jump on the cool-train bandwagon of laughing at the "stupid whore" and defending this gallant "gentleman" (and I say "gentleman" with as much scorn as possible).